IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

A farm-to-fork stochastic simulation model of pork-borne salmonellosis in humans: Lessons for risk ranking

Listed author(s):
  • Paul E. McNamara

    (Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics and Division of Nutrition, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801)

  • Gay Y. Miller

    (Departments of Veterinary Pathobiology and Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61802)

  • Xuanli Liu

    (Agricultural Research Station, Fort Valley State University, Fort Valley, GA 31030)

  • David A. Barber

    (Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Springfield, IL 62704)

A food systems perspective offers many appealing analytic features to food safety researchers with an interest in the design and targeting of effective and efficient policy responses to the risks posed by foodborne pathogens. These features include the ability to examine comparative questions such as whether it is more efficient to target food safety interventions on-farm or in the food processing plant. Using the example of a farm-to-fork stochastic simulation model of Salmonella in the pork production and consumption system, the authors argue the feasibility of such a food systems approach for food-safety risk assessment and policy analysis. They present an overview of the farm-to-fork model and highlight key assumptions and methods employed. Lessons from their experience in constructing a farm-to-fork stochastic simulation model are derived for consideration in other food safety risk assessment efforts and for researchers interested in developing “best practice” benchmarks in the area of food safety risk assessments. [EconLit Citations: Q18, I18, I12]. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Agribusiness 23: 157-172, 2007.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: Link to full text; subscription required
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. in its journal Agribusiness.

Volume (Year): 23 (2007)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
Pages: 157-172

in new window

Handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:23:y:2007:i:2:p:157-172
DOI: 10.1002/agr.20115
Contact details of provider: Web page:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Buzby, Jean C. & Roberts, Tanya & Lin, Chung-Tung Jordan & MacDonald, James M., 1996. "Bacterial Foodborne Disease: Medical Costs and Productivity Losses," Agricultural Economics Reports 33991, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  2. McNamara, Paul E. & Liu, Xuanli & Miller, Gay Y., 2003. "The Costs of Human Salmonellosis Attributable to Pork: A Stochastic Farm-to-Fork Analysis," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22023, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:23:y:2007:i:2:p:157-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing)

or (Christopher F. Baum)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.