IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/agribz/v15y1999i4p525-537.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measurement of advertising effectiveness using alternative measures of advertising exposure

Author

Listed:
  • Chanjin Chung

    (Department of Agricultural, Resource, and Managerial Economics, Cornell University, Warren Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-7801)

  • Harry M. Kaiser

    (Department of Agricultural, Resource, and Managerial Economics, Cornell University, Warren Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-7801)

Abstract

The objective of this study is to examine the impacts of alternative measures of advertising exposure on the evaluation of advertising effectiveness. This study used quarterly data of post-buy actual GRPs and corresponding advertising expenditures for the New York City fluid milk market. First, the correlation was tested between GRP and expenditure series. Then, advertising effectiveness was evaluated using these two series. Correlation tests suggested no correlation between GRP and expenditure variables was highly unlikely. The econometric analysis, however, found that the two alternatives produced quite different advertising elasticities and rates of return. The results indicate that the choice of advertising exposure measure may provide researchers with different evaluation results. [Econ-Lit citations: Q130, M300, M370] © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • Chanjin Chung & Harry M. Kaiser, 1999. "Measurement of advertising effectiveness using alternative measures of advertising exposure," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(4), pages 525-537.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:15:y:1999:i:4:p:525-537
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6297(199923)15:4<525::AID-AGR8>3.0.CO;2-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Lenz & Harry M. Kaiser & Chanjin Chung, 1998. "Economic analysis of generic milk advertising impacts on markets in New York State," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(1), pages 73-83.
    2. Hui-Shung Chang & Henry W. Kinnucan, 1992. "Measuring exposure to advertising: A look at gross rating points," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 8(5), pages 413-423.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John M. Crespi, 2003. "The Generic Advertising Controversy: How Did We Get Here and Where Are We Going?," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 25(2), pages 294-315.
    2. Roucan-Kane, Maud & Peake, Whitney O., 2007. "Milking The Most From Your Promotional Dollars: An Analysis Of Agribusiness Firms Serving U.S.Agricultural Producers," Working papers 7331, Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shew, Aaron M. & Nalley, Lawton L. & Durand-Morat, Alvaro & Meredith, Kylie & Parajuli, Ranjan & Thoma, Greg & Henry, Christopher G., 2021. "Holistically valuing public investments in agricultural water conservation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    2. Kaiser, Harry M., 1999. "Impact of Generic Fluid Milk and Cheese Advertising on Dairy Markets, 1984-1998," Research Bulletins 122684, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    3. John M. Crespi, 2003. "The Generic Advertising Controversy: How Did We Get Here and Where Are We Going?," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 25(2), pages 294-315.
    4. Lisa A. House & Yuan Jiang & Matthew Salois, 2015. "Measures of Online Advertising Effectiveness for Market Penetration: The Case of Orange Juice Consumers," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 63(4), pages 435-448, December.
    5. Julian M. Alston & John M. Crespi & Harry M. Kaiser & Richard J. Sexton, 2007. "An Evaluation of California's Mandated Commodity Promotion Programs," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 29(1), pages 40-63.
    6. Schmit, Todd M. & Dong, Diansheng & Chung, Chanjin & Kaiser, Harry M. & Gould, Brian W., 2002. "Identifying The Effects Of Generic Advertising On The Household Demand For Fluid Milk And Cheese: A Two-Step Panel Data Approach," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(1), pages 1-22, July.
    7. House, Lisa A. & Jiang, Yuan & Salois, Matthew, 2014. "Measures of Online Advertising Effectiveness: The Case of Orange Juice," 2014 AAEA/EAAE/CAES Joint Symposium: Social Networks, Social Media and the Economics of Food, May 29-30, 2014, Montreal, Canada 169776, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Todd M. Schmit & Brian W. Gould & Diansheng Dong & Harry M. Kaiser & Chanjin Chung, 2003. "The Impact of Generic Advertising on U.S. Household Cheese Purchases: A Censored Autocorrelated Regression Approach," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 51(1), pages 15-37, March.
    9. Xuqi Chen & Yan Heng & Zhifeng Gao & Yuan Jiang, 2022. "Impacts of duo‐regional generic advertising of social media on consumer preference," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(1), pages 21-44, January.
    10. Yu Wang & Zongshuan Duan & Sherry L. Emery & Yoonsang Kim & Frank J. Chaloupka & Jidong Huang, 2021. "The Association between E-Cigarette Price and TV Advertising and the Sales of Smokeless Tobacco Products in the USA," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-14, June.
    11. Dong, Diansheng & Schmit, Todd M. & Kaiser, Harry M., 2007. "Optimal Media Allocation of Generic Fluid Milk Advertising Expenditures: The Case of New York State," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(2), pages 253-266, October.
    12. Capps, O., . "Targeted Advertising and Promotion Campaigns_A Case Study of the National Pork Board," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 38(1).
    13. Chung, Chanjin & Kaiser, Harry M., 1998. "Determinants of Temporal Variations in Advertising Effectiveness," Research Bulletins 122689, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    14. Beach, Robert H. & Murray, Brian C. & Piggott, Nicholas E. & Wohlgenant, Michael K., 2002. "Interaction Effects Of Promotion, Research, And Price Support Programs For U.S. Cotton," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19803, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    15. Schmit, Todd M. & Chung, Chanjin & Dong, Diansheng & Kaiser, Harry M. & Gould, Brian W., 2001. "Identifying the Extensive and Intensive Effects of Generic Advertising on the Household Demand for Fluid Milk and Cheese," Research Bulletins 122642, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    16. Kaiser, Harry M., 2000. "Impact of Generic Fluid Milk and Cheese Advertising on Dairy Markets," Research Bulletins 122670, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    17. Schmit, Todd M. & Chung, Chanjin & Dong, Diansheng & Kaiser, Harry M. & Gould, Brian W., 2000. "The Effect Of Generic Dairy Advertising On The Household Demand For Milk And Cheese," 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL 21775, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:15:y:1999:i:4:p:525-537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6297 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.