IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/repfms/v27y2019i45p64-71n9.html

Problems of a Utopia Point Setting in Transformation of Individual Objective Functions in Multi-Objective Optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Važan Pavel

    (Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Faculty of Materials Science and Technology in Trnava, Institute of Applied Informatics, Automation and Mechatronics, Ulica Jána Bottu 2781/25, 917 24Trnava Slovak Republic)

  • Červeňanská Zuzana

    (Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Faculty of Materials Science and Technology in Trnava, Institute of Applied Informatics, Automation and Mechatronics, Ulica Jána Bottu 2781/25, 917 24Trnava Slovak Republic)

  • Kotianová Janette

    (Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Faculty of Materials Science and Technology in Trnava, Institute of Applied Informatics, Automation and Mechatronics, Ulica Jána Bottu 2781/25, 917 24Trnava Slovak Republic)

  • Holík Jiří

    (Dynamic Future, S.R.O., Občanská 1117/23, 710 00Ostrava, Czech Republic)

Abstract

In an optimal processes control, where the considered goals are in general observed as concurrently conflicted, a multi-objective approach fits the best. Commonly used scalarization techniques in multi-objective optimization need a transformation of the individual single-objective functions involved into a scalar multi-criteria objective function. There are many parameters which can influence the optimization results solutions, including an unreachable utopia point value. In this study, the authors compare the multi-objective problem solutions found via two ways of the individual objectives transformation with the respect to setting the utopia point. The methods are used in the area of production control in a case study for a batch production system. To find the solutions, The Weighted Sum Method with a priori articulated preferences under specific constraints as the scalar multi-objective optimization method is applied in simulation optimization.

Suggested Citation

  • Važan Pavel & Červeňanská Zuzana & Kotianová Janette & Holík Jiří, 2019. "Problems of a Utopia Point Setting in Transformation of Individual Objective Functions in Multi-Objective Optimization," Research Papers Faculty of Materials Science and Technology Slovak University of Technology, Sciendo, vol. 27(45), pages 64-71, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:repfms:v:27:y:2019:i:45:p:64-71:n:9
    DOI: 10.2478/rput-2019-0027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/rput-2019-0027
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/rput-2019-0027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Satyajith Amaran & Nikolaos V. Sahinidis & Bikram Sharda & Scott J. Bury, 2016. "Simulation optimization: a review of algorithms and applications," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 240(1), pages 351-380, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Noordhoek, Marije & Dullaert, Wout & Lai, David S.W. & de Leeuw, Sander, 2018. "A simulation–optimization approach for a service-constrained multi-echelon distribution network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 292-311.
    2. Huo, Jinbiao & Liu, Chengqi & Chen, Jingxu & Meng, Qiang & Wang, Jian & Liu, Zhiyuan, 2023. "Simulation-based dynamic origin–destination matrix estimation on freeways: A Bayesian optimization approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    3. Shamsi, Mohammad & Zakerinejad, Mohammad, 2025. "Towards mining 4.0: A novel multi-criteria simulation-optimization fuzzy framework for effective slag utilization overcoming green waste management promotion," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    4. Chang, Kuo-Hao & Kuo, Po-Yi, 2018. "An efficient simulation optimization method for the generalized redundancy allocation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(3), pages 1094-1101.
    5. David J. Eckman & Shane G. Henderson & Sara Shashaani, 2023. "Diagnostic Tools for Evaluating and Comparing Simulation-Optimization Algorithms," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 350-367, March.
    6. Lam, Chiou-Peng & Masek, Martin & Kelly, Luke & Papasimeon, Michael & Benke, Lyndon, 2019. "A simheuristic approach for evolving agent behaviour in the exploration for novel combat tactics," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    7. V. Kungurtsev & F. Rinaldi, 2021. "A zeroth order method for stochastic weakly convex optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 80(3), pages 731-753, December.
    8. André Snoeck & Matthias Winkenbach, 2022. "A Discrete Simulation-Based Optimization Algorithm for the Design of Highly Responsive Last-Mile Distribution Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(1), pages 201-222, January.
    9. Baichuan Mo & Zhenliang Ma & Haris N. Koutsopoulos & Jinhua Zhao, 2023. "Ex Post Path Choice Estimation for Urban Rail Systems Using Smart Card Data: An Aggregated Time-Space Hypernetwork Approach," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(2), pages 313-335, March.
    10. Wang, LiGuo & Ringwood, John V., 2021. "Control-informed ballast and geometric optimisation of a three-body hinge-barge wave energy converter using two-layer optimisation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 1159-1170.
    11. Laura Calvet & Rocio de la Torre & Anita Goyal & Mage Marmol & Angel A. Juan, 2020. "Modern Optimization and Simulation Methods in Managerial and Business Economics: A Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-23, July.
    12. Tahir Ekin & Stephen Walker & Paul Damien, 2023. "Augmented simulation methods for discrete stochastic optimization with recourse," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(2), pages 771-793, January.
    13. Romero-Silva, Rodrigo & de Leeuw, Sander, 2021. "Learning from the past to shape the future: A comprehensive text mining analysis of OR/MS reviews," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    14. Santos, Lucas F. & Costa, Caliane B.B. & Caballero, José A. & Ravagnani, Mauro A.S.S., 2022. "Framework for embedding black-box simulation into mathematical programming via kriging surrogate model applied to natural gas liquefaction process optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    15. Krityakierne, Tipaluck & Baowan, Duangkamon, 2020. "Aggregated GP-based Optimization for Contaminant Source Localization," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    16. Fu, Quanlu & Wu, Jiyan & Wu, Xuemian & Sun, Jian & Tian, Ye, 2024. "Managing network congestion with link-based incentives: A surrogate-based optimization approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    17. Gu, Ziyuan & Li, Yifan & Saberi, Meead & Rashidi, Taha H. & Liu, Zhiyuan, 2023. "Macroscopic parking dynamics and equitable pricing: Integrating trip-based modeling with simulation-based robust optimization," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 354-381.
    18. Jia, Shuai & Li, Chung-Lun & Xu, Zhou, 2020. "A simulation optimization method for deep-sea vessel berth planning and feeder arrival scheduling at a container port," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 174-196.
    19. Chia-Yen Lee & Chen-Fu Chien, 2022. "Pitfalls and protocols of data science in manufacturing practice," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(5), pages 1189-1207, June.
    20. Yifan Chen & Ziyuan Gu & Nan Zheng & Hai L. Vu, 2024. "Optimal coordinated congestion pricing for multiple regions: a surrogate-based approach," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 2139-2171, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:repfms:v:27:y:2019:i:45:p:64-71:n:9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.