IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v310y2022ics0306261922000241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Framework for embedding black-box simulation into mathematical programming via kriging surrogate model applied to natural gas liquefaction process optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Santos, Lucas F.
  • Costa, Caliane B.B.
  • Caballero, José A.
  • Ravagnani, Mauro A.S.S.

Abstract

This paper presents a framework to solve the constrained black-box simulation optimization problem that arises from the optimal energy-efficient design of single-mixed refrigerant natural gas liquefaction process using reliable process simulator. Kriging surrogate model is used to introduce simple, computationally inexpensive, and effective algebraic formulations with reliable derivatives to the black-box objective and constraints functions. The algebraic surrogate optimization problem is embedded into a nonlinear programming (NLP) model in General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS). The NLP problem is solved using efficient multi-start gradient-based optimization with CONOPT local solver to determine a candidate of decision variables for which the true functions are calculated in the rigorous simulation. The single-mixed refrigerant process is analyzed considering one-to-three-stage expansion and phase separation to assess potential energy savings. The present approach results show that more expansion stages can provide energy savings from 12.02 to 14.70 % comparing two-stage and three-stage expansion system with single-stage. This optimization framework is more effective and consistent than Particle Swarm Optimization and Genetic Algorithm given the same budget of simulation evaluations for the considered simulation optimization problems, resulting in 13.57 to 53.26 % of energy savings.

Suggested Citation

  • Santos, Lucas F. & Costa, Caliane B.B. & Caballero, José A. & Ravagnani, Mauro A.S.S., 2022. "Framework for embedding black-box simulation into mathematical programming via kriging surrogate model applied to natural gas liquefaction process optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:310:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922000241
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261922000241
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118537?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arne Stolbjerg Drud, 1994. "CONOPT—A Large-Scale GRG Code," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 207-216, May.
    2. Khan, Mohd Shariq & Lee, Moonyong, 2013. "Design optimization of single mixed refrigerant natural gas liquefaction process using the particle swarm paradigm with nonlinear constraints," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 146-155.
    3. Khan, Mohd Shariq & I.A. Karimi, & Bahadori, Alireza & Lee, Moonyong, 2015. "Sequential coordinate random search for optimal operation of LNG (liquefied natural gas) plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 757-767.
    4. Satyajith Amaran & Nikolaos V. Sahinidis & Bikram Sharda & Scott J. Bury, 2016. "Simulation optimization: a review of algorithms and applications," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 240(1), pages 351-380, May.
    5. Na, Jonggeol & Lim, Youngsub & Han, Chonghun, 2017. "A modified DIRECT algorithm for hidden constraints in an LNG process optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 488-500.
    6. Santos, Lucas F. & Costa, Caliane B.B. & Caballero, José A. & Ravagnani, Mauro A.S.S., 2020. "Synthesis and optimization of work and heat exchange networks using an MINLP model with a reduced number of decision variables," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tak, Kyungjae & Park, Jaedeuk & Moon, Il & Lee, Ung, 2023. "Comparison of mixed refrigerant cycles for natural gas liquefaction: From single mixed refrigerant to mixed fluid cascade processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    2. Yin, Xiong & Wen, Kai & Huang, Weihe & Luo, Yinwei & Ding, Yi & Gong, Jing & Gao, Jianfeng & Hong, Bingyuan, 2023. "A high-accuracy online transient simulation framework of natural gas pipeline network by integrating physics-based and data-driven methods," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    3. Santos, Lucas F. & Costa, Caliane B.B. & Caballero, José A. & Ravagnani, Mauro A.S.S., 2023. "Multi-objective simulation–optimization via kriging surrogate models applied to natural gas liquefaction process design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    4. Zhou, Jianzhao & Chu, Yin Ting & Ren, Jingzheng & Shen, Weifeng & He, Chang, 2023. "Integrating machine learning and mathematical programming for efficient optimization of operating conditions in organic Rankine cycle (ORC) based combined systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Watson, Harry A.J. & Vikse, Matias & Gundersen, Truls & Barton, Paul I., 2018. "Optimization of single mixed-refrigerant natural gas liquefaction processes described by nondifferentiable models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 860-876.
    2. Klaus Mittenzwei & Wolfgang Britz, 2018. "Analysing Farm‐specific Payments for Norway using the Agrispace Model," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(3), pages 777-793, September.
    3. Ni, Yuanming & Steinshamn, Stein I. & Kvamsdal, Sturla F., 2022. "Negative shocks in an age-structured bioeconomic model and how to deal with them," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 15-30.
    4. Yu, Taejong & Kim, Donghoi & Gundersen, Truls & Lim, Youngsub, 2023. "A feasibility study of HFO refrigerants for onboard BOG liquefaction processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    5. Huiyi Cao & Kamil A. Khan, 2023. "General convex relaxations of implicit functions and inverse functions," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 86(3), pages 545-572, July.
    6. Duarte, Belmiro P.M. & Sagnol, Guillaume & Wong, Weng Kee, 2018. "An algorithm based on semidefinite programming for finding minimax optimal designs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 99-117.
    7. Artur M. Schweidtmann & Alexander Mitsos, 2019. "Deterministic Global Optimization with Artificial Neural Networks Embedded," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 180(3), pages 925-948, March.
    8. Conrado Borraz-Sánchez & Russell Bent & Scott Backhaus & Hassan Hijazi & Pascal Van Hentenryck, 2016. "Convex Relaxations for Gas Expansion Planning," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 645-656, November.
    9. Andreas Lundell & Jan Kronqvist & Tapio Westerlund, 2022. "The supporting hyperplane optimization toolkit for convex MINLP," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 84(1), pages 1-41, September.
    10. Tosoni, E. & Salo, A. & Govaerts, J. & Zio, E., 2019. "Comprehensiveness of scenarios in the safety assessment of nuclear waste repositories," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 561-573.
    11. Durand-Lasserve, Olivier & Almutairi, Hossa & Aljarboua, Abdullah & Pierru, Axel & Pradhan, Shreekar & Murphy, Frederic, 2023. "Hard-linking a top-down economic model with a bottom-up energy system for an oil-exporting country with price controls," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    12. Masaki Kimizuka & Sunyoung Kim & Makoto Yamashita, 2019. "Solving pooling problems with time discretization by LP and SOCP relaxations and rescheduling methods," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 75(3), pages 631-654, November.
    13. Michael D. Teter & Johannes O. Royset & Alexandra M. Newman, 2019. "Modeling uncertainty of expert elicitation for use in risk-based optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 280(1), pages 189-210, September.
    14. Rastinejad, Justin & Putnam, Sloane & Stuber, Matthew D., 2023. "Technoeconomic assessment of solar technologies for the hybridization of industrial process heat systems using deterministic global dynamic optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    15. Muhammad Abdul Qyyum & Muhammad Yasin & Alam Nawaz & Tianbiao He & Wahid Ali & Junaid Haider & Kinza Qadeer & Abdul-Sattar Nizami & Konstantinos Moustakas & Moonyong Lee, 2020. "Single-Solution-Based Vortex Search Strategy for Optimal Design of Offshore and Onshore Natural Gas Liquefaction Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, April.
    16. Ali Rehman & Muhammad Abdul Qyyum & Ashfaq Ahmad & Saad Nawaz & Moonyong Lee & Li Wang, 2020. "Performance Enhancement of Nitrogen Dual Expander and Single Mixed Refrigerant LNG Processes Using Jaya Optimization Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-27, June.
    17. Emmanuel Ogbe & Xiang Li, 2019. "A joint decomposition method for global optimization of multiscenario nonconvex mixed-integer nonlinear programs," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 75(3), pages 595-629, November.
    18. Leon Lasdon & Judith S. Liebman, 1998. "The Teachers' Forum: Teaching Nonlinear Programming Using Cooperative Active Learning," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 119-132, August.
    19. Marian Leimbach & Anselm Schultes & Lavinia Baumstark & Anastasis Giannousakis & Gunnar Luderer, 2017. "Solution algorithms for regional interactions in large-scale integrated assessment models of climate change," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 255(1), pages 29-45, August.
    20. Ximing Cai & Daene C. McKinney & Leon S. Lasdon & David W. Watkins, 2001. "Solving Large Nonconvex Water Resources Management Models Using Generalized Benders Decomposition," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(2), pages 235-245, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:310:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922000241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.