IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/joinma/v17y2025i3p31-50n1002.html

The Role of Mystification in Organizational Identity and Digital Narratives

Author

Listed:
  • Dziedzic Justyna

    (SAN University, Lodz, Poland)

Abstract

Objective This study investigates the role of mystification in contemporary organizational management, focusing on how digital tools such as deepfakes and hashtags shape organizational identities and public perceptions. It aims to understand how organizations utilize mystification to enhance their image, foster trust, and shape public narratives in a digitally driven world. Methodology The research adopts a qualitative approach, analyzing case studies of organizations that have utilized deepfake technology and hashtag -driven campaigns to craft their identities. Examples include corporate brand campaigns leveraging social media trends such as #Sustainability and deepfake videos to reshape public understanding of leadership transitions. The study examines public communications, marketing materials, and media coverage to assess mystification’s effectiveness and ethical considerations. Findings The study finds that mystification through digital tools operates on two primary levels: reinforcing the desired narrative and maintaining an aura of mystery that conceals organizational complexities. Hashtags are particularly effective in constructing and consolidating organizational identities by aligning with broader societal movements. At the same time, deepfakes, though controversial, offer a powerful tool for presenting idealized yet potentially misleading corporate images. The study highlights the risks of trust erosion when digital mystification practices are exposed as false or manipulative. Value This research contributes to understanding the strategic use of mystification in organizational management. It provides insights into how organizations can effectively craft and manage their identities through digital tools while navigating the potential ethical pitfalls. The study underscores the importance of transparency and authenticity in maintaining organizational credibility. Recommendations Organizations are advised to use mystification strategically, ensuring that digital tools like deepfakes and hashtags align with core organizational values and contribute to long -term trust -building. Maintaining transparency and engaging stakeholders proactively to mitigate the risks of manipulating public perceptions is crucial. Clear ethical guidelines should be established to govern the use of digital mystification to avoid damaging reputational risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Dziedzic Justyna, 2025. "The Role of Mystification in Organizational Identity and Digital Narratives," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 17(3), pages 31-50.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:joinma:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:31-50:n:1002
    DOI: 10.2478/joim-2025-0010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/joim-2025-0010
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/joim-2025-0010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alvesson, Mats, 1994. "Critical theory and consumer marketing," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 291-313, September.
    2. M. Warner & C. Rowley, 2013. "Demystifying Chinese management: introduction," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 435-443, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fanny Reniou & Fabrice Larceneux & Béatrice Parguel & Florence Benoît-Moreau & Elisa Monnot, 2014. "Recherche et implications en marketing : l’intégration du développement durable," Post-Print hal-01330690, HAL.
    2. Szmigin, Isabelle & Gee, Veronica, 2017. "Mystification and obfuscation in portion sizes in UK food products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 176-184.
    3. Prasad, Ajnesh & Holzinger, Ingo, 2013. "Seeing through smoke and mirrors: A critical analysis of marketing CSR," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 1915-1921.
    4. O'Malley, Lisa & Prothero, Andrea, 2004. "Beyond the frills of relationship marketing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(11), pages 1286-1294, November.
    5. Wu Wei & Xuan Zhao & Mei Li & Malcolm Warner, 2016. "Integrating nonmarket and market resources, strategy and performance in Chinese enterprises: a review of the field and a resource-based empirical study," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 220-237, April.
    6. Shuang Ren & Yuhua Xie & Ying Zhu & Malcolm Warner, 2018. "New generation employees’ preferences towards leadership style in China," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 437-458, August.
    7. Shaw, Michael & Nowicki, Andrew, 2018. "Zebra crossings," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 310-314.
    8. Ming Chen & Jiao Wu, 2023. "State ownership may not be bad: Based on bibliometric research (2002–2021)," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(2), pages 1285-1304, March.
    9. Lowe, Sid & Rod, Michel, 2018. "Academic spin doctoring: The incommensurability debate as a scholarly war fantasy," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 307-309.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:joinma:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:31-50:n:1002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.