IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/scaman/v10y1994i3p291-313.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical theory and consumer marketing

Author

Listed:
  • Alvesson, Mats

Abstract

This paper draws upon Critical Theory, especially the Frankfurt School, and advocates a critically oriented marketing theory which breaks away from the technicist preoccupations dominating much of traditional marketing science. The conventional assumption of marketing as being in the business of need satisfaction is rejected, and a case is made for research which draws attention to the way marketing processes and techniques create biases towards consumption and distort the individual's chances of sorting out what needs and wishes are important. Two new metaphors for marketing theory are suggested: marketing as mystification and marketing as cultural doping.

Suggested Citation

  • Alvesson, Mats, 1994. "Critical theory and consumer marketing," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 291-313, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:10:y:1994:i:3:p:291-313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0956522194900051
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Prasad, Ajnesh & Holzinger, Ingo, 2013. "Seeing through smoke and mirrors: A critical analysis of marketing CSR," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 1915-1921.
    2. Fanny Reniou & Fabrice Larceneux & Béatrice Parguel & Florence Benoît-Moreau & Elisa Monnot, 2014. "Recherche et implications en marketing : l’intégration du développement durable," Post-Print hal-01330690, HAL.
    3. Szmigin, Isabelle & Gee, Veronica, 2017. "Mystification and obfuscation in portion sizes in UK food products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 176-184.
    4. Shaw, Michael & Nowicki, Andrew, 2018. "Zebra crossings," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 310-314.
    5. Lowe, Sid & Rod, Michel, 2018. "Academic spin doctoring: The incommensurability debate as a scholarly war fantasy," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 307-309.
    6. O'Malley, Lisa & Prothero, Andrea, 2004. "Beyond the frills of relationship marketing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(11), pages 1286-1294, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:10:y:1994:i:3:p:291-313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/872/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.