IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/foeste/v25y2025i1p337-353n1017.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Socio-Economic Perspective for the Guns Vs. Butter Trade-Off in the European Union Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Waszkiewicz Grzegorz

    (Military University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland)

  • Kutasi Gábor

    (Ludovika University of Public Service, Budapest, Hungary)

  • Marton Ádám

    (Ludovika University of Public Service, Budapest, Hungary)

Abstract

Research background At the NATO Wales Summit in 2014, European allies agreed to spend at least 2% of GDP on defence.1 However, the break-out of the Russo-Ukrainian war increased EU countries efforts to spend more on military capability not only because of solidarity in the alliance, but also as an effect of the support for Ukraine, let alone a rising security threat to their communities. Economic theory provides evidence that all-kind resources are limited, including public ones, therefore, many EU countries are facing or will face a fiscal challenges concerning the trade-off between military and non-military expenditure in the coming years. Purpose Our paper aims to identify which European countries may be vulnerable (resilient) to the guns versus butter trade-off in the near future. Research methodology We evaluated the national perspectives for reducing welfare expenditure to invest more in the army. Using an explanatory data analysis and a cluster analysis, we compared the socio-economic similarities and dissimilarities among 21 economies from the European Union. Results We conclude that national vulnerability (resilience) to the guns-butter trade-off is dependent on the current scale of defence financing and budgetary space for placing public debt on the financial markets. Novelty Our paper takes an ex-ante approach to the problem, whereas most literature offers an ex-post verification. We focused on the analysis of the preconditions for a trade-off, not the consequences.

Suggested Citation

  • Waszkiewicz Grzegorz & Kutasi Gábor & Marton Ádám, 2025. "The Socio-Economic Perspective for the Guns Vs. Butter Trade-Off in the European Union Countries," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 25(1), pages 337-353.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:foeste:v:25:y:2025:i:1:p:337-353:n:1017
    DOI: 10.2478/foli-2025-0017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/foli-2025-0017
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/foli-2025-0017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Russett, Bruce M., 1969. "Who Pays for Defense? 1," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 63(2), pages 412-426, June.
    2. Christos Kollias & Susana-Maria Paleologou, 2011. "Budgetary trade-offs between defence, education and social spending in Greece," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(11), pages 1071-1075.
    3. Iana Paliova & Robert McNown & Grant Nülle, 2019. "Multiple Dimensions of Human Development Index and Public Social Spending for Sustainable Development," IMF Working Papers 2019/204, International Monetary Fund.
    4. Eman Elish & Hossam Eldien Ahmed & Mostafa E. AboElsoud, 2023. "Military spending crowding out health and education spending: which views are valid in Egypt?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    5. Arbolino, Roberta & Boffardi, Raffaele & Ioppolo, Giuseppe, 2019. "The effectiveness of European energy policy on the Italian system: Regional evidences from a hierarchical cluster analysis approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 47-61.
    6. Russett, Bruce, 1982. "Defense Expenditures and National Well-being," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 76(4), pages 767-777, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ying Zhang & Xiaoxing Liu & Jiaxin Xu & Rui Wang, 2017. "Does military spending promote social welfare? A comparative analysis of the BRICS and G7 countries," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(6), pages 686-702, November.
    2. Eric S. Lin & Hamid E. Ali & Yu-Lung Lu, 2015. "Does Military Spending Crowd Out Social Welfare Expenditures? Evidence from a Panel of OECD Countries," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 33-48, February.
    3. Ying Zhang & Xiaoxing Liu & Rui Wang & Ruobing Tang, 2016. "Revisiting the “Guns versus Butter” Argument in China (1950–2014): New Evidence from the Continuous Wavelet Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-13, July.
    4. María Concepción Pérez-Cárceles, 2025. "Is defence expenditure a guarantee of human development? A panel data approach in the group of twenty," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(20), pages 2569-2580, April.
    5. Masako Ikegami & Zijian Wang, 2023. "Does military expenditure crowd out health-care spending? Cross-country empirics," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1657-1672, April.
    6. Seemab Gillani & Muhammad Nouman Shafiq & Tusawar Iftikhar Ahmad, 2019. "Military Expenditures and Health Outcomes: A Global Perspective," iRASD Journal of Economics, International Research Alliance for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 1(1), pages 1-20, June.
    7. Seemab Gillani & Muhammad Nouman Shafiq & Tusawar Iftikhar Ahmad, 2019. "Military Expenditures and Health Outcomes: A Global Perspective," iRASD Journal of Energy and Environment, International Research Association for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 1(1), pages 1-20, June.
    8. Won-June Hwang, 2024. "Forging Reconciliation Despite Antagonism: Examining the Normalisation of Ties Between Saudi Arabia and Iran in 2023," Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, , vol. 11(3), pages 376-399, September.
    9. Chiung-Ju Huang & Yuan-Hong Ho, 2018. "Does Taiwan's Defense Spending Crowd out Education and Social Welfare Expenditures?," Journal of Economics and Management, College of Business, Feng Chia University, Taiwan, vol. 14(1), pages 67-82, February.
    10. Adam Coutts & Adel Daoud & Ali Fakih & Walid Marrouch & Bernhard Reinsberg, 2019. "Guns and butter? Military expenditure and health spending on the eve of the Arab Spring," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 227-237, February.
    11. José Jurado Sánchez & Juan Ángel Jiménez Martín, 2014. "Guns, Economic Growth and Education during the second half of the Twentieth Century: Was Spain different?," Documentos de Trabajo del ICAE 2014-14, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico.
    12. Uk Heo & John Bohte, 2012. "Who Pays for National Defense? Financing Defense Programs in the United States, 1947–2007," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 56(3), pages 413-438, June.
    13. Klomp, Jeroen, 2023. "Political budget cycles in military expenditures: A meta-analysis," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1083-1102.
    14. Dimitrios Karamanis, 2022. "Defence partnerships, military expenditure, investment, and economic growth: an analysis in PESCO countries," GreeSE – Hellenic Observatory Papers on Greece and Southeast Europe 173, Hellenic Observatory, LSE.
    15. MAÏ ASSAN CHEDI, Maman, 2022. "Does Defence Expenditure Affect Education and Health expenditures in Saharan Africa?," African Journal of Economic Review, African Journal of Economic Review, vol. 10(4), September.
    16. Sajjad F. Dizaji & Mohammad Reza Farzanegan & Alireza Naghavi, 2016. "Political institutions and government spending behavior: theory and evidence from Iran," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 23(3), pages 522-549, June.
    17. Wen-Min Lu & Qian Long Kweh & Kang-Fu Chen, 2021. "How do peace dividends bring about human development and productivity?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 306(1), pages 435-452, November.
    18. Vincenzo Bove & Jennifer Brauner, 2016. "The demand for military expenditure in authoritarian regimes," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 609-625, September.
    19. James H. Lebovic, 2001. "Spending Priorities and Democratic Rule in Latin America," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 45(4), pages 427-452, August.
    20. Klomp, Jeroen, 2023. "Defending election victory by attacking company revenues: The impact of elections on the international defense industry," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C38 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Classification Methdos; Cluster Analysis; Principal Components; Factor Analysis
    • H56 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - National Security and War
    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:foeste:v:25:y:2025:i:1:p:337-353:n:1017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.