IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/econom/v13y2025i1p267-287n1019.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Firm’s Market Performance: How Does Sustainability Practice Influence It?

Author

Listed:
  • Babu Md. Asaduzzaman

    (Department of Marketing, Faculty of Business Studies, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur-5200, Bangladesh)

  • Ejaz Faisal

    (Department of Economics, UTAR, Kampar, 31900, Malaysia)

  • Lina Fatiha Tajnin

    (Department of Marketing, Faculty of Business Studies, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur-5200, Bangladesh)

  • Ejaz Sarmad

    (Department of Management Sciences, University of Okara, Okara, Pakistan)

  • Islam Md Rohibul

    (Department of Marketing, Faculty of Business Studies, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur-5200, Bangladesh)

  • Hassan Md. Khalid

    (Department of Business Administration, International Islami University of Science and Technology Bangladesh)

  • Hossain Md Billal

    (Sustainability Competence Centre, Széchenyi Istvàn University, 9026, Győr, Hungary)

Abstract

The study’s central theme is sustainability practice. It aims to measure the impact of sustainability practices on market performance. The study is quantitative, and data was obtained through a structured questionnaire using a five-point Likert scale. Different firms, such as manufacturing, non-manufacturing, and service support, run the survey by sharing the data (n=200). Data were analysed through Smart PLS version 4.1.0.0, employing a structural equation model (SEM) technique to measure the impact of exogenous variables. All three variables (Employee engagement in sustainability, corporate social responsibility, and environmental concern) positively and significantly impact sustainability practice. Thus, the study’s central finding is that sustainability practice positively influences the market performance of the firms, and the association is also significant. Companies that adopt sustainable practices can differentiate themselves in the market, potentially improving their competitiveness. Companies can exploit the notion that sustainability is a highly efficient technique for stimulating growth. Integrating sustainable principles can lead to long-lasting economic advantages. The novelty of this work is that it considers sustainability practices to determine the impact on market performance. Future work can be conducted on the specification of market performance, such as sales growth, return on investment (ROI), return on assets (ROA), and earnings per share (EPS).

Suggested Citation

  • Babu Md. Asaduzzaman & Ejaz Faisal & Lina Fatiha Tajnin & Ejaz Sarmad & Islam Md Rohibul & Hassan Md. Khalid & Hossain Md Billal, 2025. "A Firm’s Market Performance: How Does Sustainability Practice Influence It?," Economics, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 267-287.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:econom:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:267-287:n:1019
    DOI: 10.2478/eoik-2025-0020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2025-0020
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/eoik-2025-0020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Acquaye, Adolf & Ibn-Mohammed, Taofeeq & Genovese, Andrea & Afrifa, Godfred A & Yamoah, Fred A & Oppon, Eunice, 2018. "A quantitative model for environmentally sustainable supply chain performance measurement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 188-205.
    2. Massimiliano Cerciello & Francesco Busato & Simone Taddeo, 2023. "The effect of sustainable business practices on profitability. Accounting for strategic disclosure," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 802-819, March.
    3. Degnet, Mohammed B. & Hansson, Helena & Hoogstra-Klein, Marjanke A. & Roos, Anders, 2022. "The role of personal values and personality traits in environmental concern of non-industrial private forest owners in Sweden," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Josset, Clement & Shanafelt, David W. & Abildtrup, Jens & Stenger, Anne, 2023. "Probabilistic typology of private forest owners: A tool to target the development of new market for ecosystem services," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    2. Long, Tengju & Wu, Ge & Miao, Zhuang & Chen, Xiaodong, 2024. "Quantifying consumption-based environmental productivity from “Energy-Environment Footprints”," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    3. Ekström, Hanna & Danley, Brian & Clough, Yann & Droste, Nils, 2024. "Barking up the wrong tree? - A guide to forest owner typology methods," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    4. Chen, Xiaodong & Guo, Anda & Miao, Zhuang & Zhu, Pengyu, 2024. "Assessing the performance of the transport sector within the global supply chain context: Decomposition of energy and environmental productivity," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    5. Smith, Lucy & Ibn-Mohammed, Taofeeq & Yang, Fan & Reaney, Ian M. & Sinclair, Derek C. & Koh, S.C. Lenny, 2019. "Comparative environmental profile assessments of commercial and novel material structures for solid oxide fuel cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1300-1313.
    6. Shib Sankar Sana, 2022. "A structural mathematical model on two echelon supply chain system," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 1997-2025, August.
    7. Madushan Madhava Jayalath & H. Niles Perera & Stefan Seuring & Amila Thibbotuwawa, 2024. "Social drivers affecting job design in apparel supply chains: Inferences from a discrete choice experiment," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 3395-3413, July.
    8. Wang, Yizhong & Jeong, Sujong & Hang, Ye & Wang, Qunwei, 2024. "Multi-sector environmental efficiency and productivity: A general Leontief optimization method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    9. Tan, Yang & Ying, Xiaoyu & Ge, Jian & Gao, Weijun & Zhang, Li & Wang, Shuai, 2024. "Driving role of perceived psychological factors in households’ low-carbon behaviors: A study based on the Chinese household carbon generalized system of preferences," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    10. Changiz Valmohammadi & Javad Sofiyabadi & Bahare Kolahi, 2019. "How do Knowledge Management Practices Affect Sustainable Balanced Performance? Mediating Role of Innovation Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-23, September.
    11. Agnese, Paolo & Cerciello, Massimiliano & Oriani, Raffaele & Taddeo, Simone, 2024. "ESG controversies and profitability in the European banking sector," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    12. Mansour Alyahya & Meqbel Aliedan & Gomaa Agag & Ziad H. Abdelmoety, 2022. "Exploring the Link between Sustainable Development Practices, Institutional Pressures, and Green Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, November.
    13. Imadeddine Oubrahim & Naoufal Sefiani & Ari Happonen, 2023. "The Influence of Digital Transformation and Supply Chain Integration on Overall Sustainable Supply Chain Performance: An Empirical Analysis from Manufacturing Companies in Morocco," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-24, January.
    14. Bayne, Karen M. & Grant, Andrea, 2024. "Who cares what happens with planted forests? A public typology to assist community engagement and communication," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    15. Wu Ning & Ummar Faruk Saeed & Angelina Kissiwaa Twum & Abednego Osei, 2024. "Can ESG disclosures promote firms going concern? Evidence from BRICS countries," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 3792-3803, September.
    16. Halkos, George & Gkargkavouzi, Anastasia, 2024. "Personality traits and associations with pro-environmental and economically-relevant behaviors: A brief overview of research evidence," MPRA Paper 119775, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Fengyi Lin & Sheng-Wei Lin & Wen-Min Lu, 2018. "Sustainability Assessment of Taiwan’s Semiconductor Industry: A New Hybrid Model Using Combined Analytic Hierarchy Process and Two-Stage Additive Network Data Envelopment Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
    18. Yiğit Kazançoğlu & Muhittin Sağnak & Çisem Lafcı & Sunil Luthra & Anil Kumar & Caner Taçoğlu, 2021. "Big Data-Enabled Solutions Framework to Overcoming the Barriers to Circular Economy Initiatives in Healthcare Sector," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-21, July.
    19. Reddy, K. Nageswara & Kumar, Akhilesh & Choudhary, Alok & Cheng, T. C. Edwin, 2022. "Multi-period green reverse logistics network design: An improved Benders-decomposition-based heuristic approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 735-752.
    20. Tanja Dergan & Aneta Ivanovska & Tina Kocjančič & Pietro P. M. Iannetta & Marko Debeljak, 2022. "‘Multi-SWOT’ Multi-Stakeholder-Based Sustainability Assessment Methodology: Applied to Improve Slovenian Legume-Based Agri-Food Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-26, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Employee Engagement; CSR; Environmental Concern; Sustainability Practice; Market Performance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M11 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Production Management
    • L1 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance
    • L25 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Performance
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:econom:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:267-287:n:1019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.