IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/url/izvest/v20y2019i3p23-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advanced development territories: Institutional and regional contradictions

Author

Listed:
  • B. L. Kuznetsov

    (Naberezhnye Chelny Institute of Kazan Federal University)

  • S. B. Kuznetsova

    (Naberezhnye Chelny Institute of Kazan Federal University)

  • G. F. Galiullina

    (Naberezhnye Chelny Institute of Kazan Federal University)

Abstract

To reach national goals, Russia’s strategic planning documents heavily count on the territories of advanced socioeconomic development as a tool for attracting investments, stimulating faster economic growth, and improving standards of living. The paper discusses the functioning experience of the first territories of advanced socioeconomic development and contradictions between the federal center, regions, investors, and corporations present in the regions. The authors pay attention to, first and foremost, the revealed discrepancies in the quality of the innovation infrastructure, budgetary funding of the territories, and benefits received by the residents. The methodological basis of the study includes a system-synergetic and an institutional-synergetic approaches, investment and innovation theories, and theory of intergovernmental relations with statistical analysis as the main metod. To improve the process of creating territories of advanced development and expand their role, the authors propose a set of measures based on a system-synergetic approach, which consolidates rather than strengthers the inter-corporate competitive atmosphere in regions with limited economic capabilities. The research substantiates the claim that territories of advanced development have not discredited themselves as an institution, but such territories are unable to induce radical changes in regions lacking a modern base for development of high technologies. The research findings show that to increase the efficiency of the territories of advanced socioeconomic development, their creation should be accompanied by establishment of a scientific and technical base for high technologies that is adequate to the level of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. The results of the research may be useful to organisers, designers, technologists and investors involved in the development of this new institutional platform.

Suggested Citation

  • B. L. Kuznetsov & S. B. Kuznetsova & G. F. Galiullina, 2019. "Advanced development territories: Institutional and regional contradictions," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 20(3), pages 23-37, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:url:izvest:v:20:y:2019:i:3:p:23-37
    DOI: 10.29141/2073-1019-2019-20-3-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jne.usue.ru/images/download/83/2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://jne.usue.ru/en/issues-2019/808
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.29141/2073-1019-2019-20-3-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodrik, Dani, 2004. "Industrial Policy for the Twenty-First Century," CEPR Discussion Papers 4767, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dennis, Allen & Shepherd, Ben, 2007. "Trade costs, barriers to entry, and export diversification in developing countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4368, The World Bank.
    2. Shafaeddin, Mehdi, 2010. "Trade liberalization, industrialization and development; experience of recent decades," MPRA Paper 26355, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Inayat U. Mangla & Muslehud Din, 2015. "The Impact of the Macroeconomic Environment on Pakistan’s Manufacturing Sector," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 20(Special E), pages 241-260, September.
    4. Lütkenhorst, Wilfried, 2018. "Creating wealth without labour? Emerging contours of a new techno-economic landscape," IDOS Discussion Papers 11/2018, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    5. Ufuk Akcigit & Harun Alp & André Diegmann & Nicolas Serrano-Velarde, 2023. "Committing to Grow: Privatizations and Firm Dynamics in East Germany," Working Papers 685, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
    6. Nathan, Max & Rosso, Anna, 2014. "Mapping information economy businesses with big data: findings from the UK," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 60615, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Vu, Khuong & Hartley, Kris, 2018. "Promoting smart cities in developing countries: Policy insights from Vietnam," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 845-859.
    8. Ufuk Akcigit & Sina T. Ates & Giammario Impullitti, 2018. "Innovation and Trade Policy in a Globalized World," NBER Working Papers 24543, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Diogo Ferraz & Fernanda P. S. Falguera & Enzo B. Mariano & Dominik Hartmann, 2021. "Linking Economic Complexity, Diversification, and Industrial Policy with Sustainable Development: A Structured Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-29, January.
    10. Naved Hamid & Maha Khan, 2015. "Pakistan: A Case of Premature Deindustrialization?," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 20(Special E), pages 107-141, September.
    11. Hardik A. Marfatia, 2016. "The Role of Push and Pull Factors in Driving Global Capital Flows," Applied Economics Quarterly (formerly: Konjunkturpolitik), Duncker & Humblot GmbH, Berlin, vol. 62(2), pages 117-146.
    12. Frederick van der Ploeg & Steven Poelhekke, 2008. "Globalization and the rise of mega-cities in the developing world," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 1(3), pages 477-501.
    13. Ron Boschma, 2021. "Designing Smart Specialization Policy: relatedness, unrelatedness, or what?," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2128, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Sep 2021.
    14. Elvira Uyarra & Jens Sörvik & Inger Midtkandal, 2014. "Inter-regional Collaboration in Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisation (RIS3). S3 Working Paper Series no 6/2014," JRC Research Reports JRC91963, Joint Research Centre.
    15. Alfons Palangkaraya, 2013. "On the Relationship between Innovation and Export: The Case of Australian SMEs," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2013n04, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    16. Ricardo Hausmann & Jason Hwang & Dani Rodrik, 2007. "What you export matters," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, March.
    17. Tim Kelsall, 2012. "Neo-Patrimonialism, Rent-Seeking and Development: Going with the Grain?," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 677-682, November.
    18. Tom Broekel & Lars Mewes, 2017. "Analyzing the impact of R&D policy on regional diversification," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1726, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Sep 2017.
    19. Krzysztof Mieszkowski & Marcin Kardas, 2015. "Facilitating an Entrepreneurial Discovery Process for Smart Specialisation. The Case of Poland," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 6(2), pages 357-384, June.
    20. Dani Rodrik, 2006. "What's So Special about China's Exports?," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    development institutions; territories of advanced socioeconomic development; advanced development; breakthrough strategy; synergetic approach to design;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R10 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:url:izvest:v:20:y:2019:i:3:p:23-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Blaginin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/usueeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.