The Law and Positive Political Theory of Panel Effects
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1086/682693
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
- Christina L. Boyd & Lee Epstein & Andrew D. Martin, 2010. "Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(2), pages 389-411, April.
- Tiller, Emerson H & Spiller, Pablo T, 1999. "Strategic Instruments: Legal Structure and Political Games in Administrative Law," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 15(2), pages 349-377, July.
- Álvaro Bustos & Tonja Jacobi, 2014.
"Strategic Judicial Preference Revelation,"
Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 57(1), pages 113-137.
- Álvaro Bustos & Tonja Jacobi, 2010. "Strategic Judicial Preference Revelation," Documentos de Trabajo 380, Instituto de Economia. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile..
- Smith, Joseph L & Tiller, Emerson H, 2002. "The Strategy of Judging: Evidence from Administrative Law," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(1), pages 61-82, January.
- Max M. Schanzenbach & Emerson H. Tiller, 2007. "Strategic Judging Under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines: Positive Political Theory and Evidence," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 24-56, April.
- Jonathan P. Kastellec, 2007. "Panel Composition and Judicial Compliance on the US Courts of Appeals," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(2), pages 421-441, June.
- Emerson H. Tiller, 2007. "Legal Doctrine and Political Control," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(2), pages 326-345, June.
- Lax, Jeffrey R., 2007. "Constructing Legal Rules on Appellate Courts," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 101(3), pages 591-604, August.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Sun, Sunny Li & Choi, Yoona & Guo, Feng & Guo, Jinyu & Zou, Bo & Cui, Lin, 2023. "Winning intellectual property rights lawsuits in China," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 58(3).
- Christoph Engel, 2021. "Lucky You: Your Case is Heard by a Seasoned Panel – Panel Effects in the German Constitutional Court," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2021_05, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, revised 01 Jun 2022.
- Keren Weinshall & Udi Sommer & Ya'acov Ritov, 2018. "Ideological influences on governance and regulation: The comparative case of supreme courts," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(3), pages 334-352, September.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Michael Abramowicz & Emerson H. Tiller, 2009. "Citation to Legislative History: Empirical Evidence on Positive Political and Contextual Theories of Judicial Decision Making," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 38(2), pages 419-443, June.
- Xiaohong Yu & Zhaoyang Sun, 2022. "The company they keep: When and why Chinese judges engage in collegiality," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 936-1002, December.
- Shawn D. Bushway & Emily G. Owens & Anne Morrison Piehl, 2012.
"Sentencing Guidelines and Judicial Discretion: Quasi‐Experimental Evidence from Human Calculation Errors,"
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(2), pages 291-319, June.
- Shawn D. Bushway & Emily G. Owens & Anne Morrison Piehl, 2011. "Sentencing Guidelines and Judicial Discretion: Quasi-experimental Evidence from Human Calculation Errors," NBER Working Papers 16961, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Thomas J. Miles, 2012. "Racial Disparities in Wiretap Applications before Federal Judges," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 41(2), pages 419-458.
- Crow, Matthew S. & Goulette, Natalie, 2022. "Judicial diversity and sentencing disparity across U.S. District Courts," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
- Tom S Clark, 2016. "Scope and precedent: judicial rule-making under uncertainty," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 28(3), pages 353-384, July.
- Joshua B. Fischman & Max M. Schanzenbach, 2011. "Do Standards of Review Matter? The Case of Federal Criminal Sentencing," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 40(2), pages 405-437.
- Charles M. Cameron & Lewis A. Kornhauser, 2017. "Rational choice attitudinalism?," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 535-554, June.
- Jacobi, Tonja & Kontorovich, Eugene, 2015. "Why judges always vote," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 190-199.
- Joshua A Strayhorn, 2019. "Competing signals in the judicial hierarchy," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 31(3), pages 308-329, July.
- Christoph Engel, 2021. "Lucky You: Your Case is Heard by a Seasoned Panel – Panel Effects in the German Constitutional Court," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2021_05, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, revised 01 Jun 2022.
- Sean Farhang & Jonathan P. Kastellec & Gregory J. Wawro, 2015. "The Politics of Opinion Assignment and Authorship on the US Court of Appeals: Evidence from Sexual Harassment Cases," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 44(S1), pages 59-85.
- Chen, Daniel L. & Levonyan, Vardges & Yeh, Susan, 2016.
"Policies Affect Preferences: Evidence from Random Variation in Abortion Jurisprudence,"
IAST Working Papers
16-58, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST).
- Chen, Daniel L. & Levonyan, Vardges & Yeh, Susan, 2016. "Policies Affect Preferences: Evidence from Random Variation in Abortion Jurisprudence," TSE Working Papers 16-723, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
- Shamena Anwar & Patrick Bayer & Randi Hjalmarsson, 2019.
"Politics in the Courtroom: Political Ideology and Jury Decision Making,"
Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 17(3), pages 834-875.
- Hjalmarsson, Randi & Anwar, Shamena & Bayer, Patrick, 2015. "Politics in the Courtroom: Political Ideology and Jury Decision Making," CEPR Discussion Papers 10589, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Anwar, Shamena Anwar & Bayer, Patrick & Hjalmarsson, Randi, 2015. "Politics in the Courtroom: Political Ideology and Jury Decision Making," Working Papers in Economics 622, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
- Shamena Anwar & Patrick Bayer & Randi Hjalmarsson, 2015. "Politics in the Courtroom: Political Ideology and Jury Decision Making," NBER Working Papers 21145, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- George Tridimas, 2010. "Constitutional judicial review and political insurance," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 81-101, February.
- Richard Holden & Michael Keane & Matthew Lilley, 2021.
"Peer effects on the United States Supreme Court,"
Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(3), pages 981-1019, July.
- Richard Holden & Michael Keane & Matthew Lilley, 2017. "Peer Effects on the United States Supreme Court," Economics Papers 2017-W02, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
- Richard Holden & Michael Keane & Matthew Lilley, 2019. "Peer Effects on the United States Supreme Court," Discussion Papers 2019-01, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
- Richard Holden & Michael Keane & Matthew Lilley, 2020. "Peer Effects on the United States Supreme Court," Discussion Papers 2019-01b, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
- repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/4jcok93a4m9d1qtc3vnp4bdefk is not listed on IDEAS
- Moulin Xiong & Yiwei Xia & Xiaohong Yu, 2025. "Sentencing equilibrium in rape cases: a legal and political explanation of jurisdictional uniformity in China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
- Chen, Daniel L., 2016.
"Priming Ideology: Why Presidential Elections Affect U.S. Judges,"
TSE Working Papers
16-681, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised Aug 2016.
- Chen, Daniel L., 2016. "Priming Ideology: Why Presidential Elections Affect U.S. Judges," IAST Working Papers 16-39, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST), revised Aug 2016.
- Xiaoyu Cui & Jianlei Han & Jeong Bon Kim & Baolei Qi, 2024. "Federal judge ideology, securities class action litigation, and stock price crash risk," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 64(4), pages 4131-4155, December.
- Pierre Bentata & Romain Espinosa & Yolande Hiriart, 2019.
"Correction Activities by France’s Supreme Courts and Control over their Dockets,"
Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 129(2), pages 169-204.
- Pierre Bentata & Romain Espinosa & Yolande Hiriart, 2019. "Correction Activities by France’s Supreme Courts and Control over their Dockets," Post-Print halshs-02167246, HAL.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/682693. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLS .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.