IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Geographical Dynamics: A Sectoral Comparison Between the Economic Landscapes of the United States and Europe

  • Joaquin Andaluz
  • Luis Fernando Lanaspa
  • Fernando Sanz

There is a certain degree of consensus that economic activity is more concentrated in the US than in Europe. In this paper we aim to test the empirical validity of such a proposition, identifying the sectors for which this assertion is more appropriate and determining their predictable future evolution. There are three main results. First, that the US economic area is not clearly more concentrated than that of Europe; second, that the economic landscape of the European regions is changing more rapidly than that of the US states; third, that the future evolution of both economic areas will lead to an increase in the European concentrating forces and a decrease in those of the US. Jusqu'aun certain point on est d'accord sur l'affirmation que l'activite economique est plus concentree aux Etats-Unis qu'elle ne l'est en Europe. Cet article cherche a mettre a l'epreuve la validite empirique d'une telle assertion, en identifiant les secteurs pour lesquels cette assertion s'avere appropriee et en determinant leur developpement futur previsible. Il en resulte trois constats principaux. Primo, la zone economique americaine ne s'avere pas nettement plus concentree que celle de l'Europe; secundo, le paysage economique des regions europeennes se developpe plus rapidement que ne le fait celui aux Etats-Unis; tertio, le developpement futur des deux zones economiques entrainera une croissance des forces ala concentration en Europe et une decroissance de celles aux Etats-Unis. Es besteht in gewisser Weise Ubereinstimmung in der Ansicht, dass wirtschaftliche Aktivitat in den Vereinigten Staaten konzentrierter auftritt als in Europa. In diesem Aufsatz wird versucht, die emipirische Gultigkeit dieser These zu prufen, indem die Sektoren, fur die diese Behauptung zutreffender ist, herausgestellt, und ihre voraussichtliche zukunftige Entwicklung bestimmt wird. Dies fuhrt zu drei Hauptergebnissen. Erstens, dass das amerikanische Wirtschaftsgebiet nicht deutlich starker konzentriert ist als das europaische; zweitens, dass die wirtschaftliche Landschaft der europaischen Regionen sich schneller verandert als die der Staaten der USA; und drittens, dass die zukunftige Entwicklung beider Wirtschaftsgebiete zur Zunahme der europaischen Krafte der Konzentration und Abnahme derjenigen in den USA fuhren wird.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Regional Studies.

Volume (Year): 36 (2002)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
Pages: 321-332

in new window

Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:36:y:2002:i:4:p:321-332
Contact details of provider: Web page:

Order Information: Web:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

as in new window
  1. Krugman, Paul R & Venables, Anthony J, 1995. "Globalization and the Inequality of Nations," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 110(4), pages 857-80, November.
  2. Krugman, Paul, 1991. "Increasing Returns and Economic Geography," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(3), pages 483-99, June.
  3. Masahisa Fujita & Paul Krugman & Anthony J. Venables, 2001. "The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262561476, June.
  4. Danny Quah, 1992. "Empirical Cross-Section Dynamics in Economic Growth," FMG Discussion Papers dp154, Financial Markets Group.
  5. Quah, Danny, 1996. "Regional Convergence Clusters Across Europe," CEPR Discussion Papers 1286, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  6. Quah, Danny T., 1996. "Regional convergence clusters across Europe," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(3-5), pages 951-958, April.
  7. Glenn Ellison & Edward L. Glaeser, 1994. "Geographic Concentration in U.S. Manufacturing Industries: A Dartboard Approach," NBER Working Papers 4840, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  8. Shorrocks, A F, 1978. "The Measurement of Mobility," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(5), pages 1013-24, September.
  9. K.H. Midelfart & H.G. Overman & S.J. Redding & A.J. Venables, 2000. "The location of European industry," European Economy - Economic Papers 142, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
  10. Quah, Danny T., 1996. "Empirics for economic growth and convergence," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 1353-1375, June.
  11. Proudman, James & Redding, Stephen J., 1998. "Persistence and Mobility in International Trade," CEPR Discussion Papers 1802, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  12. Venables, Anthony J, 1995. "Economic Integration and the Location of Firms," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 85(2), pages 296-300, May.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:36:y:2002:i:4:p:321-332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.