IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/quantf/v15y2015i5p761-772.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Least Squares Monte Carlo with diffusion bridges: an application to energy facilities

Author

Listed:
  • T. Pellegrino
  • P. Sabino

Abstract

The aim of this study is to present an efficient and easy framework for the application of the Least Squares Monte Carlo methodology to the pricing of gas or power facilities as detailed in Boogert and de Jong [ J. Derivatives , 2008, 15 , 81-91]. As mentioned in the seminal paper by Longstaff and Schwartz [ Rev. Financ. Stud. 2001, 113-147], the convergence of the Least Squares Monte Carlo algorithm depends on the convergence of the optimization combined with the convergence of the pure Monte Carlo method. In the context of the energy facilities, the optimization is more complex and its convergence is of fundamental importance in particular for the computation of sensitivities and optimal dispatched quantities. To our knowledge, an extensive study of the convergence, and hence of the reliability of the algorithm, has not been performed yet, in our opinion this is because the apparent infeasibility and complexity uses a very high number of simulations. We present then an easy way to simulate random trajectories by means of diffusion bridges in contrast to Dutt and Welke [ J. Derivatives , 2008, 15 (4), 29-47] that considers time-reversal Itô diffusions and subordinated processes. In particular, we show that in the case of Cox-Ingersoll-Ross and Heston models, the bridge approach has the advantage to produce exact simulations even for non-Gaussian processes, in contrast to the time-reversal approach. Our methodology permits performing a backward dynamic programming strategy based on a huge number of simulations without storing the whole simulated trajectory. Generally, in the valuation of energy facilities, one is also interested in the forward recursion. We then design backward and forward recursion algorithms such that one can produce the same random trajectories by the use of multiple independent random streams without storing data at intermediate time steps. Finally, we show the advantages of our methodology for the valuation of virtual hydro power plants and gas storages.

Suggested Citation

  • T. Pellegrino & P. Sabino, 2015. "Enhancing Least Squares Monte Carlo with diffusion bridges: an application to energy facilities," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(5), pages 761-772, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:15:y:2015:i:5:p:761-772
    DOI: 10.1080/14697688.2014.941913
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14697688.2014.941913
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14697688.2014.941913?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Devroye, Luc, 2002. "Simulating Bessel random variables," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(3), pages 249-257, April.
    2. Nicola Cufaro Petroni & Piergiacomo Sabino, 2011. "Multidimensional Quasi-Monte Carlo Malliavin Greeks," Papers 1103.5722, arXiv.org.
    3. Eduardo Schwartz & James E. Smith, 2000. "Short-Term Variations and Long-Term Dynamics in Commodity Prices," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(7), pages 893-911, July.
    4. Anderson, Brian D.O., 1982. "Reverse-time diffusion equation models," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 313-326, May.
    5. Jan Baldeaux & Dale Roberts, 2012. "Quasi-Monte Carol Methods for the Heston Model," Research Paper Series 307, Quantitative Finance Research Centre, University of Technology, Sydney.
    6. Longstaff, Francis A & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 2001. "Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach," University of California at Los Angeles, Anderson Graduate School of Management qt43n1k4jb, Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA.
    7. Longstaff, Francis A & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 2001. "Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 14(1), pages 113-147.
    8. Mark Broadie & Özgür Kaya, 2006. "Exact Simulation of Stochastic Volatility and Other Affine Jump Diffusion Processes," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(2), pages 217-231, April.
    9. Lin Yuan & John Kalbfleisch, 2000. "On the Bessel Distribution and Related Problems," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 52(3), pages 438-447, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Piergiacomo Sabino & Nicola Cufaro Petroni, 2022. "Fast simulation of tempered stable Ornstein–Uhlenbeck processes," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(5), pages 2517-2551, November.
    2. Nicola Cufaro Petroni & Piergiacomo Sabino, 2020. "Tempered stable distributions and finite variation Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes," Papers 2011.09147, arXiv.org.
    3. Matteo Gardini & Piergiacomo Sabino & Emanuela Sasso, 2020. "A bivariate Normal Inverse Gaussian process with stochastic delay: efficient simulations and applications to energy markets," Papers 2011.04256, arXiv.org.
    4. Piergiacomo Sabino, 2021. "Pricing Energy Derivatives in Markets Driven by Tempered Stable and CGMY Processes of Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Type," Papers 2103.13252, arXiv.org.
    5. M. Gardini & P. Sabino & E. Sasso, 2021. "The Variance Gamma++ Process and Applications to Energy Markets," Papers 2106.15452, arXiv.org.
    6. Piergiacomo Sabino, 2021. "Normal Tempered Stable Processes and the Pricing of Energy Derivatives," Papers 2105.03071, arXiv.org.
    7. Matteo Gardini & Piergiacomo Sabino & Emanuela Sasso, 2020. "Correlating L\'evy processes with Self-Decomposability: Applications to Energy Markets," Papers 2004.04048, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2020.
    8. Nicola Cufaro Petroni & Piergiacomo Sabino, 2019. "Fast Pricing of Energy Derivatives with Mean-reverting Jump-diffusion Processes," Papers 1908.03137, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2020.
    9. Matteo Gardini & Piergiacomo Sabino & Emanuela Sasso, 2021. "Correlating Lévy processes with self-decomposability: applications to energy markets," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 44(2), pages 1253-1280, December.
    10. Nicola Cufaro Petroni & Piergiacomo Sabino, 2020. "Gamma Related Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Processes and their Simulation," Papers 2003.08810, arXiv.org.
    11. Piergiacomo Sabino, 2020. "Exact Simulation of Variance Gamma related OU processes: Application to the Pricing of Energy Derivatives," Papers 2004.06786, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Glasserman & Kyoung-Kuk Kim, 2011. "Gamma expansion of the Heston stochastic volatility model," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 267-296, June.
    2. Wenbin Hu & Junzi Zhou, 2017. "Backward simulation methods for pricing American options under the CIR process," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(11), pages 1683-1695, November.
    3. Mo, Jian-Lei & Schleich, Joachim & Zhu, Lei & Fan, Ying, 2015. "Delaying the introduction of emissions trading systems—Implications for power plant investment and operation from a multi-stage decision model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(PB), pages 255-264.
    4. Song-Ping Zhu & Xin-Jiang He, 2018. "A hybrid computational approach for option pricing," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(03), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Marcelo G. Figueroa, 2006. "Pricing Multiple Interruptible-Swing Contracts," Birkbeck Working Papers in Economics and Finance 0606, Birkbeck, Department of Economics, Mathematics & Statistics.
    6. Abdullah Almansour & Margaret Insley, 2016. "The Impact of Stochastic Extraction Cost on the Value of an Exhaustible Resource: An Application to the Alberta Oil Sands," The Energy Journal, , vol. 37(2), pages 61-88, April.
    7. Chi H. Truong, 2014. "A Two Factor Model for Water Prices and Its Implications for Evaluating Real Options and Other Water Price Derivatives," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 62(1), pages 23-45, March.
    8. Luis M. Abadie & José M. Chamorro, 2009. "Monte Carlo valuation of natural gas investments," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), pages 10-22, January.
    9. Mo, Jian-Lei & Agnolucci, Paolo & Jiang, Mao-Rong & Fan, Ying, 2016. "The impact of Chinese carbon emission trading scheme (ETS) on low carbon energy (LCE) investment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 271-283.
    10. Max F. Schöne & Stefan Spinler, 2017. "A four-factor stochastic volatility model of commodity prices," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 135-165, July.
    11. Fedorov, Semyon & Lavrutich, Maria & Hagspiel, Verena & Lerdahl, Thomas, 2022. "Risk and benefit sharing schemes in oil exploration and production," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    12. Hanfeld, Marc & Schlüter, Stephan, 2016. "Operating a swing option on today's gas markets: How least squares Monte Carlo works and why it is beneficial," FAU Discussion Papers in Economics 10/2016, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Institute for Economics.
    13. Michael A. Kouritzin & Anne Mackay, 2020. "Branching Particle Pricers With Heston Examples," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(01), pages 1-29, February.
    14. Jafarizadeh, Babak, 2012. "Information acquisition as an American option," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 807-816.
    15. Didier Nibbering & Coos van Buuren & Wei Wei, 2021. "Real Options Valuation of Wind Energy Based on the Empirical Production Uncertainty," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 19/21, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    16. Alexander Boogert & Cyriel de Jong, 2007. "Gas Storage Valuation Using a Monte Carlo Method," Birkbeck Working Papers in Economics and Finance 0704, Birkbeck, Department of Economics, Mathematics & Statistics.
    17. Fedorov, Semyon & Hagspiel, Verena & Rogstad, Richard W.H. & Haseldonckx, Sophie & Haugsgjerd, Johannes H. & Rønning, Anders, 2024. "Evaluation of tieback developments for marginal oil fields with timing flexibility," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    18. Michael A. Kouritzin, 2018. "Explicit Heston Solutions And Stochastic Approximation For Path-Dependent Option Pricing," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(01), pages 1-45, February.
    19. Andrianos E. Tsekrekos & Mark B. Shackleton & Rafał Wojakowski, 2012. "Evaluating Natural Resource Investments under Different Model Dynamics: Managerial Insights," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 18(4), pages 543-575, September.
    20. Chung-Li Tseng & Daniel Wei-Chung Miao & San-Lin Chung & Pai-Ta Shih, 2021. "How Much Do Negative Probabilities Matter in Option Pricing?: A Case of a Lattice-Based Approach for Stochastic Volatility Models," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-32, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:15:y:2015:i:5:p:761-772. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RQUF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.