IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/marpmg/v43y2016i8p945-958.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A simulation model for gate operations in multi-purpose cargo terminals

Author

Listed:
  • Yavuz Keceli

Abstract

A multi-purpose cargo terminal in a seaport contains necessary infrastructure to handle different types of cargo, such as container, dry bulk, general bulk, and Ro-Ro. Since such terminals generally have dedicated areas and equipment for different types of cargo, berth, and yard operations for each type of cargo can be considered separate. On the other hand, trucks that carry all types of cargo use the same gate structure to enter and leave the terminal. Therefore, a method to superimpose the traffic that is caused by different types of cargo is needed for the planning of gate investments and operations. Consequently, this paper has developed a simulation model for a multi-purpose terminal to estimate the gate traffic and determine the necessary gate infrastructure, so that it can be used as a decision support tool for terminal planners and operational managers.

Suggested Citation

  • Yavuz Keceli, 2016. "A simulation model for gate operations in multi-purpose cargo terminals," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 945-958, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:43:y:2016:i:8:p:945-958
    DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2016.1169448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03088839.2016.1169448
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03088839.2016.1169448?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Panagiotis Angeloudis & Michael G. H. Bell, 2011. "A review of container terminal simulation models," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(5), pages 523-540, February.
    2. Juan Díaz-Hernández & Eduardo Martínez-Budría & Sergio Jara-Diaz, 2008. "Parametric estimation of inefficiency in cargo handling in Spanish ports," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 223-232, December.
    3. Genevieve Giuliano & Thomas O’Brien, 2008. "Extended gate operations at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach: a preliminary assessment," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(2), pages 215-235, April.
    4. Yun, Won Young & Choi, Yong Seok, 1999. "A simulation model for container-terminal operation analysis using an object-oriented approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1-3), pages 221-230, March.
    5. Shy Bassan, 2007. "Evaluating seaport operation and capacity analysis—preliminary methodology," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 3-19, February.
    6. Rizzoli, Andrea E. & Fornara, Nicoletta & Gambardella, Luca Maria, 2002. "A simulation tool for combined rail/road transport in intermodal terminals," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 57-71.
    7. Coronado Mondragon, Adrian E. & Lalwani, Chandra S. & Coronado Mondragon, Etienne S. & Coronado Mondragon, Christian E. & Pawar, Kulwant S., 2012. "Intelligent transport systems in multimodal logistics: A case of role and contribution through wireless vehicular networks in a sea port location," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(1), pages 165-175.
    8. Yeo, Gi-Tae & Pak, Ji-Yeong & Yang, Zaili, 2013. "Analysis of dynamic effects on seaports adopting port security policy," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 285-301.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cemalettin Öztürk & F. Zeynep Sargut & M. Arslan Örnek & Deniz Türsel Eliiyi, 2017. "Optimisation and heuristic approaches for assigning inbound containers to outbound carriers," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(7), pages 825-836, October.
    2. Orlando Marco Belcore & Massimo Di Gangi & Antonio Polimeni, 2023. "Connected Vehicles and Digital Infrastructures: A Framework for Assessing the Port Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Davies K. Bett & Islam Ali & Mohamed Gheith & Amr Eltawil, 2024. "Simulation-Based Optimization of Truck Appointment Systems in Container Terminals: A Dual Transactions Approach with Improved Congestion Factor Representation," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-30, August.
    4. Calwin S. Parthibaraj & PL.K. Palaniappan & Angappa Gunasekaran & Nachiappan Subramanian, 2017. "Multi-agent system with iterative auction mechanism for master bay plan problem in marine logistics," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(6), pages 705-726, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Branislav Dragović & Ernestos Tzannatos & Nam Kuy Park, 2017. "Simulation modelling in ports and container terminals: literature overview and analysis by research field, application area and tool," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 4-34, March.
    2. Amir Gharehgozli & Nima Zaerpour & Rene Koster, 2020. "Container terminal layout design: transition and future," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(4), pages 610-639, December.
    3. Cimpeanu, Radu & Devine, Mel T. & O’Brien, Conor, 2017. "A simulation model for the management and expansion of extended port terminal operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 105-131.
    4. Yoon, Junghyun & Lee, Hee Yong & Dinwoodie, John, 2015. "Competitiveness of container terminal operating companies in South Korea and the industry–university–government network," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1-14.
    5. Na, Ung Jin & Shinozuka, Masanobu, 2009. "Simulation-based seismic loss estimation of seaport transportation system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 722-731.
    6. Leonard Heilig & Stefan Voß, 0. "Information systems in seaports: a categorization and overview," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    7. Yang, Zaili & Ng, Adolf K.Y. & Wang, Jin, 2014. "A new risk quantification approach in port facility security assessment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 72-90.
    8. Kastner, Marvin & Kämmerling, Nicolas & Jahn, Carlos & Clausen, Uwe, 2020. "Equipment selection and layout planning - Literature overview and research directions," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Data Science in Maritime and City Logistics: Data-driven Solutions for Logistics and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conferen, volume 30, pages 485-519, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    9. Tierney, Kevin & Voß, Stefan & Stahlbock, Robert, 2014. "A mathematical model of inter-terminal transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 448-460.
    10. Ricardo Martín & Víctor Yepes, 2021. "Bridging the Gap between Landscape and Management within Marinas: A Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, August.
    11. Chang, Víctor & Tovar, Beatriz, 2014. "Drivers explaining the inefficiency of Peruvian and Chilean ports terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 190-203.
    12. Giuliano, Genevieve & Linder, Alison, 2013. "Motivations for self-regulation: The clean air action plan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 513-522.
    13. Xiaoju Zhang & Yue Gu & Yuqing Yang & Baoli Liu, 2023. "Comparing the Efficiency of Two Types of Yard Layout in Container Terminals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    14. Nils Boysen & Malte Fliedner & Florian Jaehn & Erwin Pesch, 2013. "A Survey on Container Processing in Railway Yards," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 312-329, August.
    15. Roanes-Lozano, Eugenio & Laita, Luis M. & Roanes-Macías, Eugenio & Wester, Michael J. & Ruiz-Lozano, José Luis & Roncero, Carlos, 2009. "Evolution of railway network flexibility: The Spanish broad gauge case," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 79(8), pages 2317-2332.
    16. Seo, Young-Joon & Park, Jin Suk, 2016. "The estimation of minimum efficient scale of the port industry," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 168-175.
    17. Zhou, Yonghua & Tao, Xin & Luan, Lei & Ning, Jingjie, 2018. "Revisiting the 7/23 train accident using computer reconstruction simulation for causation and prevention analysis," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1-15.
    18. Lee, Yusin & Chao, Shih-Liang, 2009. "A neighborhood search heuristic for pre-marshalling export containers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 468-475, July.
    19. Legato, Pasquale & Mazza, Rina M., 2001. "Berth planning and resources optimisation at a container terminal via discrete event simulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(3), pages 537-547, September.
    20. Parola, Francesco & Sciomachen, Anna, 2005. "Intermodal container flows in a port system network:: Analysis of possible growths via simulation models," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 75-88, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:43:y:2016:i:8:p:945-958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TMPM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.