IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jocebs/v10y2012i2p147-168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Anglo-Saxon paradox: corporate governance best-practices and the reform deficit in China's banking sector

Author

Listed:
  • Damian Tobin

Abstract

Corporate governance is now a key concern in China's banking sector. Its importance is related to the important policy questions of how to foster economic growth without increasing inflation in an environment where monetary guidance does not function in a conventional manner and there exist few constraints on bank lending. Under such an environment top-down best practice models offer considerable appeal, but their implementation in China's banking sector suffers from a reform deficit. In this context, this study argues that innovative reforms that draw on existing institutions and expertise such as the reform of the China Postal and Savings Bank and the relaxation of restrictions on foreign banks in the rural sector indicate a unique and policy-driven response to this conundrum. Their advantage is that they provide the state with a ready-made platform to influence economic activity in the rural economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Damian Tobin, 2012. "The Anglo-Saxon paradox: corporate governance best-practices and the reform deficit in China's banking sector," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 147-168, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jocebs:v:10:y:2012:i:2:p:147-168
    DOI: 10.1080/14765284.2012.673780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14765284.2012.673780
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jocebs:v:10:y:2012:i:2:p:147-168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCEA20 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.