IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jecmet/v1y1994i1p1-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why is there so much disagreement among economists?

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Mayer

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Mayer, 1994. "Why is there so much disagreement among economists?," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 1-14.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jecmet:v:1:y:1994:i:1:p:1-14
    DOI: 10.1080/13501789400000001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13501789400000001
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13501789400000001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Machlup, Fritz, 1978. "Methodology of Economics and Other Social Sciences," Elsevier Monographs, Elsevier, edition 1, number 9780124645509 edited by Shell, Karl.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thomas Mayer, 2001. "The role of ideology in disagreements among economists: a quantitative analysis," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 253-273.
    2. Thomas Mayer, "undated". "Monetarists And Keynesians On Central Banking: A Study Of A Failed Debate," Department of Economics 96-06, California Davis - Department of Economics.
    3. Dagenais, Denyse L., 1995. "L’économiste et les confitures," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 71(3), pages 277-290, septembre.
    4. Thomas Mayer, 2001. "The role of ideology in disagreements among economists: a quantitative analysis," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 253-273.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goran Runeson, 1997. "The role of theory in construction management research: comment," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 299-302.
    2. Dunk, Alan S., 2003. "Moderated regression, constructs and measurement in management accounting: a reflection," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(7-8), pages 793-802.
    3. Klaus Mohn, 2010. "Autism in Economics? A Second Opinion," Forum for Social Economics, Springer;The Association for Social Economics, vol. 39(2), pages 191-208, July.
    4. Priddat, Birger P., 2012. "Rationality, hermeneutics, and communicational processes: On L. Lachmann's approach of hermeneutical economics," Wittener Diskussionspapiere zu alten und neuen Fragen der Wirtschaftswissenschaft 18/2012, Witten/Herdecke University, Faculty of Management and Economics.
    5. Philippe Mongin, 2007. "L'a priori et l'a posteriori en économie," Recherches économiques de Louvain, De Boeck Université, vol. 73(1), pages 5-53.
    6. Werker, C. & Brenner, T., 2004. "Empirical calibration of simulation models," Working Papers 04.13, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies.
    7. P. C. Afxentiou*, 1985. "Opportunity Costs and Collective Bargaining," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 53(4), pages 244-250, December.
    8. Speklé, R.F., 2003. "Configurations of Control: A Transaction Cost Approach," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2003-071-F&A, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    9. Jan Toporowski, 2007. "On rhetoric and being realistic about the monetary policy of developing countries," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 47-55.
    10. Philip A. Klein, 1988. "Of Paradigms and Politics," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 435-441, June.
    11. Thomas Brenner & Claudia Werker, 2009. "Policy Advice Derived from Simulation Models," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 12(4), pages 1-2.
    12. Philippe Mongin, 2006. "Value Judgments and Value Neutrality in Economics," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 73(290), pages 257-286, May.
    13. Alejandro Diaz-Bautista, 2005. "La metodología de la investigación en la Economía Aplicada; The Research Methodology in Applied Economics," Method and Hist of Econ Thought 0509008, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Christian Knudsen, 2004. "Alfred schutz, Austrian Economists and the Knowledge Problem," Rationality and Society, , vol. 16(1), pages 45-89, February.
    15. Lall Ramrattan & Michael Szenberg, 2005. "A Review of Robert Heilbroner's Contributions, in Memoriam 1919–2005," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 49(2), pages 16-32, October.
    16. Ross, Bruce W., 1996. "Towards an observational economics of business behaviour: the horizontal supply curve, 'fuzzy' demand and other anomalies for conventional theory," MPRA Paper 26783, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Daniel Dufourt, 1993. "L'économie politique," Post-Print halshs-01273102, HAL.
    18. Arkadiusz Sieron, 2020. "Some Problems of Behavioral Economics," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 336-362.
    19. Norgaard, Richard, 1982. "Resource Economics and Development Economics: Synthesis of Reformation?," CUDARE Working Papers 198224, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    20. Wagner-Tsukamoto Sigmund, 2013. "The Adam Smith Problem Revisited: A Methodological Resolution," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 19(1), pages 63-99, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jecmet:v:1:y:1994:i:1:p:1-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.