IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ssi/jouesi/v12y2025i4p232-250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information technology / artificial intelligence use and labor productivity in firms

Author

Listed:
  • Edmunds Čižo

    (Daugavpils University, Latvia)

  • Vera Komarova

    (Daugavpils University, Latvia)

  • Anita Kokarēviča

    (Riga Stradins University, Latvia)

  • Jānis Kudiņš

    (Daugavpils University, Latvia)

  • Oksana Ruža

    (Daugavpils University, Latvia)

  • Elena Fedorova

    (Daugavpils University, Latvia)

Abstract

This study aims to develop conceptual frameworks and propose an appropriate research methodology for analyzing the relationship between information technology (IT) and artificial intelligence (AI) use and labor productivity in firms, particularly within the context of Latvian ones. Drawing from a comprehensive literature review, it identifies key theoretical models, including the Technology Acceptance Model, Diffusion of Innovations, Resource-Based View, and Socio-Technical Systems Theory, as foundational for understanding IT/AI use in firms and its effects on productivity. The study also proposes a hybrid research methodology combining quantitative causal inference techniques (such as panel data regressions, difference-in-differences, instrumental variable regressions, and Stochastic Frontier Analysis) with qualitative approaches (including case studies, expert interviews, and content analysis) to capture both the measurable impacts and organizational dynamics of IT/AI use. Furthermore, it outlines how advanced tools like machine learning models and Bayesian networks can model complex interdependencies. The conceptual framework integrates theoretical insights with empirical indicators from Latvian official statistics, illustrating how IT/AI contributes to productivity via automation, augmentation, and labor reallocation. The study concludes by identifying limitations (such as its conceptual focus and country-specific scope) and recommends future empirical studies that apply the proposed framework across sectors and regions using firm-level data to validate and expand upon its findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Edmunds Čižo & Vera Komarova & Anita Kokarēviča & Jānis Kudiņš & Oksana Ruža & Elena Fedorova, 2025. "Information technology / artificial intelligence use and labor productivity in firms," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 12(4), pages 232-250, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:12:y:2025:i:4:p:232-250
    DOI: 10.9770/x3348726554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/uploads/articles/48/Cizo_Information_technology__artificial_intelligence_use_and_labor_productivity_in_firms.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/1311
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.9770/x3348726554?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evgeniy Korshenkov & Sergey Ignatyev, 2020. "Empirical interpretation and measurement of the productivity and efficiency of regions: the case of Latvia," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 2(2), pages 549-561, June.
    2. Daron Acemoglu & Ufuk Akcigit & Harun Alp & Nicholas Bloom & William Kerr, 2018. "Innovation, Reallocation, and Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(11), pages 3450-3491, November.
    3. Krugman, Paul, 1991. "Increasing Returns and Economic Geography," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(3), pages 483-499, June.
    4. Evgeniy Korshenkov & Sergey Ignatyev, 2020. "Empirical interpretation and measurement of the productivity and efficiency of regions: the case of Latvia," Post-Print hal-02919627, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peng, Kai & Yu, Fang & Kong, Dongmin & Li, Yang & Geng, Ruihang, 2024. "Do government-guided funds "guide" the transregional mobility of capital? Evidence from cross-city equity investments," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    2. Wenyue Cui & Jie Tang, 2023. "Does the Construction of Transportation Infrastructure Enhance Regional Innovation Capabilities: Evidence from China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(4), pages 3598-3615, December.
    3. Beata Gavurova & Silvia Megyesiova & Matej Hudak, 2021. "Green Growth in the OECD Countries: A Multivariate Analytical Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Nikolay I. Dorogov & Ivan A. Kapitonov & Ivan A. Kapitonov & Nazygul T. Batyrova, 2020. "The role of national plans in developing the competitiveness of the state economy," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(1), pages 672-686, September.
    5. Meri Davlasheridze & Pinar C. Geylani, 2017. "Small Business vulnerability to floods and the effects of disaster loans," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 865-888, December.
    6. Davenport, Sally, 2005. "Exploring the role of proximity in SME knowledge-acquisition," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 683-701, June.
    7. Mark Partridge & M. Rose Olfert & Alessandro Alasia, 2007. "Canadian cities as regional engines of growth: agglomeration and amenities," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 40(1), pages 39-68, February.
    8. João Juchem Neto & Julio Claeyssen, 2015. "Capital-induced labor migration in a spatial Solow model," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 115(1), pages 25-47, May.
    9. Arcalean, Calin & Glomm, Gerhard & Schiopu, Ioana, 2012. "Growth effects of spatial redistribution policies," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 988-1008.
    10. Marcel Bednarz & Tom Broekel, 2020. "Pulled or pushed? The spatial diffusion of wind energy between local demand and supply," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 29(4), pages 893-916.
    11. Joan R Rosés & Nikolaus Wolf, 2021. "Regional growth and inequality in the long-run: Europe, 1900–2015," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 37(1), pages 17-48.
    12. Emma Howard, 2017. "Social networks, geographic proximity, and firm performance in Vietnam," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2017-69, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    13. Ingrid Ott & Susanne Soretz, 2006. "Governmental activity, integration, and agglomeration," Working Paper Series in Economics 57, University of Lüneburg, Institute of Economics.
    14. Gao, Ting, 2004. "Regional industrial growth: evidence from Chinese industries," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 101-124, January.
    15. María Ayuda & Fernando Collantes & Vicente Pinilla, 2010. "From locational fundamentals to increasing returns: the spatial concentration of population in Spain, 1787–2000," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 25-50, March.
    16. Vasco Leite & Sofia Castro & João Correia-da-Silva, 2009. "The core periphery model with asymmetric inter-regional and intra-regional trade costs," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 8(1), pages 37-44, April.
    17. Sidney Turner & Richard Turner, 2011. "Capital cities: a special case in urban development," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 46(1), pages 19-35, February.
    18. Agarwalla, Astha, 2011. "Agglomeration Economies and Productivity Growth in India," IIMA Working Papers WP2011-01-08, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    19. Masashige Hamano & Pierre M. Picard, 2017. "Extensive and intensive margins and exchange rate regimes," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 50(3), pages 804-837, August.
    20. Michael Beenstock & Daniel Felsenstein, 2003. "Decomposing the Dynamics of Regional Earnings Disparities in Israel," ERSA conference papers ersa03p90, European Regional Science Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    information technology (IT); Artificial Intelligence (AI); enterprises; labor productivity; conceptual framework; correlation vs. causality; research methodology;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
    • L23 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Organization of Production
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • C81 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data; Data Access

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:12:y:2025:i:4:p:232-250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Tvaronaviciene (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.