IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spt/admaec/v11y2021i5f11_5_5.html

How to Improve the Effect of Live Streaming? From the Perspective of Content Type

Author

Listed:
  • Wen-Chin Tsao
  • Pei-Ching Liao
  • Hao-Fan Chumg

Abstract

With the rapid development of online social media, live streaming has become a global trend and a new direction for strategic marketing in all walks of life. Therefore, this study mainly discusses how to improve audience’s attitude toward watching live streaming, and promotes purchase intention and positive word-of-mouth based on the four success factors of live streaming. The results show that: 1) among the four success factors, only playfulness and interactivity can positively and significantly affect attitude toward watching live streaming; 2) the attitude toward watching has positive and significant impact on the follow-up behavioural intentions (purchase intention and positive word-of-mouth); 3) the results of moderating analysis show that the positive impact of attitude toward watching on the intention of follow-up behaviour is not significantly different according to different types of live content. The findings of this study can provide different strategic views on the operation of live streaming platforms for live streaming hosts or those who use the platforms, by which to improve their business performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Wen-Chin Tsao & Pei-Ching Liao & Hao-Fan Chumg, 2021. "How to Improve the Effect of Live Streaming? From the Perspective of Content Type," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 11(5), pages 1-5.
    • Handle: RePEc:spt:admaec:v:11:y:2021:i:5:f:11_5_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.scienpress.com/Upload/AMAE%2fVol%2011_5_5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shirley Taylor & Peter A. Todd, 1995. "Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 144-176, June.
    2. Park, Hyun Jung & Lin, Li Min, 2020. "The effects of match-ups on the consumer attitudes toward internet celebrities and their live streaming contents in the context of product endorsement," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    3. Bruner, Gordon II & Kumar, Anand, 2005. "Explaining consumer acceptance of handheld Internet devices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(5), pages 553-558, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tsourela Maria & Roumeliotis Manos, 2017. "Technology-Based Services Adoption: A Comparison of the Major Applications," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(03), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Adams, Peter & Farrell, Mark & Dalgarno, Barney & Oczkowski, Edward, 2017. "Household Adoption of Technology: The Case of High-Speed Broadband Adoption in Australia," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 37-47.
    3. Zhou, Min & Huang, Jinlong & Wu, Kexin & Huang, Xin & Kong, Nan & Campy, Kathryn S., 2021. "Characterizing Chinese consumers’ intention to use live e-commerce shopping," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    4. Z Irani & Y K Dwivedi & M D Williams, 2009. "Understanding consumer adoption of broadband: an extension of the technology acceptance model," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(10), pages 1322-1334, October.
    5. Chang, Tai-Wei, 2023. "An indispensable role in promoting the electric vehicle Industry: An empirical test to explore the integration framework of electric vehicle charger and electric vehicle purchase behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    6. Hsiao, Chun Hua & Yang, Chyan, 2011. "The intellectual development of the technology acceptance model: A co-citation analysis," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 128-136.
    7. Yang, Kiseol, 2012. "Consumer technology traits in determining mobile shopping adoption: An application of the extended theory of planned behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 484-491.
    8. Gérard Cliquet & Christine Gonzalez & Élodie Huré & Karine Picot-Coupey, 2013. "Validation d’un modèle d’intention de magasiner avec le smartphone : implications pour les concepteurs de services mobiles," Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes & University of Caen) 201342, Center for Research in Economics and Management (CREM), University of Rennes, University of Caen and CNRS.
    9. Porter, Constance Elise & Donthu, Naveen, 2006. "Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine Internet usage: The role of perceived access barriers and demographics," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(9), pages 999-1007, September.
    10. Yuan Li & Jiaqi Liang & Jingxiong Huang & Mengsheng Yang & Runyan Li & Huanxia Bai, 2022. "Would You Accept Virtual Tourism? The Impact of COVID-19 Risk Perception on Technology Acceptance from a Comparative Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, October.
    11. Mohammad Hasan Galib & Khalid Ait Hammou & Jennifer Steiger, 2018. "Predicting Consumer Behavior: An Extension of Technology Acceptance Model," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(3), pages 1-73, August.
    12. Nastjuk, Ilja & Herrenkind, Bernd & Marrone, Mauricio & Brendel, Alfred Benedikt & Kolbe, Lutz M., 2020. "What drives the acceptance of autonomous driving? An investigation of acceptance factors from an end-user's perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    13. Nedra, Bahri-Ammari & Hadhri, Walid & Mezrani, Mariem, 2019. "Determinants of customers' intentions to use hedonic networks: The case of Instagram," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 21-32.
    14. Se-Joon Hong & James Y. L. Thong & Jae-Yun Moon & Kar-Yan Tam, 2008. "Understanding the behavior of mobile data services consumers," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 431-445, September.
    15. Agozie, Divine Q. & Afful-Dadzie, Anthony & Gyamfi, Bright Akwasi & Bekun, Festus Victor, 2023. "Does psychological empowerment improve renewable energy technology acceptance and recommendation? Evidence from 17 rural communities," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P1).
    16. Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas & Nidhi Singh & Zoran Kalinic & Elena Carvajal-Trujillo, 2021. "Examining the determinants of continuance intention to use and the moderating effect of the gender and age of users of NFC mobile payments: a multi-analytical approach," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 133-161, June.
    17. Pan, Jing Yu & Liu, Dahai, 2022. "Mask-wearing intentions on airplanes during COVID-19 – Application of theory of planned behavior model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 32-44.
    18. Mohammed Akhmaaj, Asmaeil Ali & Sharif, Mohamed Omar, 2024. "The effects of planned behavior model constructs and technology acceptance model constructs on online purchasing behavior: An empirical study on internet users in the Libya city of Tripoli," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    19. Yang, Jialiang & Li, Yaokuang & Calic, Goran & Shevchenko, Anton, 2020. "How multimedia shape crowdfunding outcomes: The overshadowing effect of images and videos on text in campaign information," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 6-18.
    20. Hasan, Rajibul & Lowe, Ben & Petrovici, Dan, 2020. "Consumer adoption of pro-poor service innovations in subsistence marketplaces," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 461-475.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spt:admaec:v:11:y:2021:i:5:f:11_5_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eleftherios Spyromitros-Xioufis (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.scienpress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.