IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sjobre/v66y2014i68d10.1007_bf03373728.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Von Risiko zu Resilienz — Zum Umgang mit Unerwartetem aus Organisationsperspektive

Author

Listed:
  • Gordon Müller-Seitz

    (TU Kaiserslautern)

Abstract

Incalculable uncertainties, as opposed to calculable risks, characterize a large number of unexpected events that globally operating companies face. Against this background, it is surprising that there are hardly any managerial approaches that tackle the phenomenon while venturing beyond ex ante calculable risks. Based upon a literature review, a first step towards a practicing uncertainty framework is called for, arguing that managing unexpected events differs from risk approaches. Towards this end, moving from mere risk calculations to insights from resilience research is advocated.

Suggested Citation

  • Gordon Müller-Seitz, 2014. "Von Risiko zu Resilienz — Zum Umgang mit Unerwartetem aus Organisationsperspektive," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 66(68), pages 102-122, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:66:y:2014:i:68:d:10.1007_bf03373728
    DOI: 10.1007/BF03373728
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03373728
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF03373728?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joseph Lampel & Jamal Shamsie & Zur Shapira, 2009. "Experiencing the Improbable: Rare Events and Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(5), pages 835-845, October.
    2. Marlys K. Christianson & Maria T. Farkas & Kathleen M. Sutcliffe & Karl E. Weick, 2009. "Learning Through Rare Events: Significant Interruptions at the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Museum," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(5), pages 846-860, October.
    3. Power, Michael, 2009. "The risk management of nothing," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(6-7), pages 849-855, August.
    4. Sally Maitlis & Scott Sonenshein, 2010. "Sensemaking in Crisis and Change: Inspiration and Insights From Weick (1988)," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 551-580, May.
    5. Karlene H. Roberts, 1990. "Some Characteristics of One Type of High Reliability Organization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(2), pages 160-176, May.
    6. Brahim Herbane, 2010. "The evolution of business continuity management: A historical review of practices and drivers," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(6), pages 978-1002.
    7. Christmann, Gabriela B. & Ibert, Oliver & Kilper, Heiderose & Moss, Timothy, 2011. "Vulnerabilität und Resilienz in sozio-räumlicher Perspektive: Begriffliche Klärungen und theoretischer Rahmen [Vulnerability and Resilience from a Socio-Spatial Perspective: Towards a Theoretical F," IRS Working Papers 44, Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS).
    8. Dominic Elliott & Denis Smith, 2006. "Cultural Readjustment After Crisis: Regulation and Learning from Crisis Within the UK Soccer Industry," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(2), pages 289-317, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Castán Broto, Vanesa & Glendinning, Stephanie & Dewberry, Emma & Walsh, Claire & Powell, Mark, 2014. "What can we learn about transitions for sustainability from infrastructure shocks?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 186-196.
    2. Gwendolyn K. Lee & Joseph Lampel & Zur Shapira, 2020. "After the Storm Has Passed: Translating Crisis Experience into Useful Knowledge," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 1037-1051, July.
    3. Kristina Vaarst Andersen & Karin Beukel & Beverly B. Tyler, 2021. "Learning to Litigate: the Relationship Between Past Litigation Experience and Litigation Outcomes in the Chinese Intellectual Property System," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 479-500, December.
    4. Linda Argote & Sunkee Lee & Jisoo Park, 2021. "Organizational Learning Processes and Outcomes: Major Findings and Future Research Directions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5399-5429, September.
    5. Lionel Garreau & Serge Perrot, 2012. "Comprendre la dynamique de la socialisation organisationnelle: Une approche par le sensemaking," Post-Print halshs-00949067, HAL.
    6. Kyrdoda, Yuliia & Balzano, Marco & Marzi, Giacomo, 2023. "Learn to survive crises: The role of firm resilience, innovation capabilities and environmental dynamism," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    7. Lionel Garreau & Serge Perrot, 2012. "Comprendre la dynamique de la socialisation organisationnelle : une approche par le sensemaking," Post-Print halshs-01054809, HAL.
    8. Jennifer Oetzel & Chang Hoon Oh, 2021. "A storm is brewing: Antecedents of disaster preparation in risk prone locations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(8), pages 1545-1570, August.
    9. André Luis Silva & Márcia de Freitas Duarte & Flávia Plutarco, 2020. "Organizational Rare Events: Theory and Research Practice," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 72(4), pages 635-659, October.
    10. Irina Surdu & Kamel Mellahi & Keith Glaister, 2017. "Once bitten, not necessarily shy? Organisational learning prior experience effects on foreign market re-entry commitment decisions," John H Dunning Centre for International Business Discussion Papers jhd-dp2017-04, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    11. Manisaligil, Alperen & Gölgeci, İsmail & Bakker, Arnold B. & Faruk Aysan, Ahmet & Babacan, Mehmet & Gür, Nurullah, 2023. "Understanding change in disruptive contexts: The role of the time paradox and locus of control," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    12. Karl E. Weick, 2010. "Reflections on Enacted Sensemaking in the Bhopal Disaster," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 537-550, May.
    13. Azadegan, Arash & Srinivasan, Ravi & Blome, Constantin & Tajeddini, Kayhan, 2019. "Learning from near-miss events: An organizational learning perspective on supply chain disruption response," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 215-226.
    14. Maximilian Weis & Patricia Klarner, 2022. "A CEO’s Future Temporal Depth and Organizational Resilience," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 659-693, December.
    15. Sharma, Amalesh & Borah, Sourav Bikash & Moses, Aditya C., 2021. "Responses to COVID-19: The role of governance, healthcare infrastructure, and learning from past pandemics," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 597-607.
    16. Mary Ann Glynn & Lee Watkiss, 2020. "Of Organizing and Sensemaking: From Action to Meaning and Back Again in a Half‐Century of Weick’s Theorizing," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(7), pages 1331-1354, November.
    17. repec:dau:papers:123456789/9535 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Irina Surdu & Kamel Mellahi & Keith W Glaister, 2019. "Once bitten, not necessarily shy? Determinants of foreign market re-entry commitment strategies," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(3), pages 393-422, April.
    19. Joep P. Cornelissen & Saku Mantere & Eero Vaara, 2014. "The Contraction of Meaning: The Combined Effect of Communication, Emotions, and Materiality on Sensemaking in the Stockwell Shooting," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5), pages 699-736, July.
    20. Jennifer M. Oetzel & Chang Hoon Oh, 2014. "Learning to Carry the Cat by the Tail: Firm Experience, Disasters, and Multinational Subsidiary Entry and Expansion," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 732-756, June.
    21. Stephanie Duchek, 2020. "Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(1), pages 215-246, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    M10;

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:66:y:2014:i:68:d:10.1007_bf03373728. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.