IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sjobre/v60y2008i7d10.1007_bf03372809.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gestaltung und Erfolgsauswirkungen der Absatzplanung: Eine branchenübergreifende empirische Analyse

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Homburg

    (Universität Mannheim)

  • Martin Artz

    (Universität Mannheim)

  • Jan Wieseke

    (Ruhr-Universität Bochum)

  • Bernhard Schenkel

Abstract

Zusammenfassung Die bisherige Forschung hat die Erfolgsauswirkungen operativer Planung in Marketing und Vertrieb weitgehend vernachlässigt. Im vorliegenden Beitrag wird im Rahmen einer großzahligen, branchenübergreifenden empirischen Studie kausalanalytisch untersucht, inwiefern und unter welchen Umständen eine erfolgreiche Absatzplanung zu höherem Unternehmenserfolg führt und welche Gestaltungsempfehlungen für die Planung gegeben werden können. Es zeigt sich, dass eine erfolgreiche Absatzplanung durch sechs zentrale Faktoren fast vollständig determiniert wird. Unsere Analyse moderierender Effekte zeigt zudem, dass die Absatzplanung auch für Unternehmen in dynamischen Märkten ein wirkungsvolles Instrument der Marktbearbeitung ist und widerspricht damit einer zentralen Annahme des Beyond Budgeting Konzeptes. Zudem zeigen die Ergebnisse, dass eine erfolgreiche Absatzplanung bei zunehmender Dezentralisierung effizienzsteigernd wirkt.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Homburg & Martin Artz & Jan Wieseke & Bernhard Schenkel, 2008. "Gestaltung und Erfolgsauswirkungen der Absatzplanung: Eine branchenübergreifende empirische Analyse," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 60(7), pages 634-670, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:60:y:2008:i:7:d:10.1007_bf03372809
    DOI: 10.1007/BF03372809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03372809
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF03372809?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jehoshua Eliashberg & Richard Steinberg, 1987. "Marketing-Production Decisions in an Industrial Channel of Distribution," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(8), pages 981-1000, August.
    2. Merchant, Kenneth A., 1985. "Budgeting and the propensity to create budgetary slack," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 201-210, April.
    3. Otley, David & Fakiolas, Alexander, 2000. "Reliance on accounting performance measures: dead end or new beginning?," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 25(4-5), pages 497-510, May.
    4. Rapert, Molly Inhofe & Velliquette, Anne & Garretson, Judith A., 2002. "The strategic implementation process: evoking strategic consensus through communication," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 301-310, April.
    5. Homburg, Christian & Rudolph, Bettina, 2001. "Customer satisfaction in industrial markets: dimensional and multiple role issues," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 15-33, April.
    6. Otley, Dt, 1978. "Budget Use And Managerial Performance," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(1), pages 122-149.
    7. Maximilian Jung & Christian Riegler, 1999. "Accounting information, salesforce compensation and acquisition of new customers," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 421-441.
    8. Armstrong, J. Scott & Overton, Terry S., 1977. "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys," MPRA Paper 81694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Noble, Charles H., 1999. "The Eclectic Roots of Strategy Implementation Research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 119-134, June.
    10. Parker, Robert J. & Kyj, Larissa, 2006. "Vertical information sharing in the budgeting process," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 27-45, January.
    11. Emsley, David, 2000. "Variance analysis and performance: two empirical studies," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 1-12, January.
    12. Chapman, Christopher S., 1998. "Accountants in organisational networks," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(8), pages 737-766, November.
    13. Chenhall, Robert H., 2003. "Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 127-168.
    14. Lawrence C. Rhyne, 1987. "Contrasting Planning Systems In High, Medium And Low Performance Companies," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(4), pages 363-385, July.
    15. Marginson, David & Ogden, Stuart, 2005. "Coping with ambiguity through the budget: the positive effects of budgetary targets on managers' budgeting behaviours," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 435-456, July.
    16. Hartmann, Frank G. H. & Moers, Frank, 1999. "Testing contingency hypotheses in budgetary research: an evaluation of the use of moderated regression analysis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 291-315, May.
    17. Barwise, Patrick & Farley, John U., 2004. "Marketing Metrics:: Status of Six Metrics in Five Countries," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 257-262, June.
    18. Piercy, Nigel F. & Morgan, Neil A., 1994. "The marketing planning process: Behavioral problems compared to analytical techniques in explaining marketing plan credibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 167-178, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adam Maiga & Anders Nilsson & Fred Jacobs, 2014. "Assessing the impact of budgetary participation on budgetary outcomes: the role of information technology for enhanced communication and activity-based costing," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 5-32, September.
    2. Klaus Derfuss, 2015. "Relating Context Variables to Participative Budgeting and Evaluative Use of Performance Measures: A Meta-analysis," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 51(2), pages 238-278, June.
    3. Christian Daumoser & Bernhard Hirsch & Matthias Sohn, 2018. "Honesty in budgeting: a review of morality and control aspects in the budgetary slack literature," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 115-159, August.
    4. Hall, Matthew, 2011. "Do comprehensive performance measurement systems help or hinder managers' mental model development?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 36703, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Noeverman, J. & Koene, B.A.S., 2010. "Contextual Influences on Evaluative Style and its Effectiveness: Three Avenues for Future Research," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2010-047-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    6. Staci A. Kenno & Michelle C. Lau & Barbara J. Sainty, 2018. "In Search of a Theory of Budgeting: A Literature Review," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 507-553, December.
    7. Utz Schäffer & Michael Zyder, 2007. "Eine Analyse des moderierenden Einflusses der Faktoren Wettbewerbsintensität, Marktdynamik und dezentrale Autonomie auf die erfolgreiche Gestaltung der Budgetierung," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 7-33, April.
    8. Luft, Joan & Shields, Michael D., 2003. "Mapping management accounting: graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 169-249.
    9. Per Ståle Knardal & Trond Bjørnenak, 2020. "Managerial characteristics and budget use in festival organizations," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 379-402, December.
    10. Chandana Rathnasiri Hewege, 2012. "A Critique of the Mainstream Management Control Theory and the Way Forward," SAGE Open, , vol. 2(4), pages 21582440124, December.
    11. Bisbe, Josep & Batista-Foguet, Joan-Manuel & Chenhall, Robert, 2007. "Defining management accounting constructs: A methodological note on the risks of conceptual misspecification," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(7-8), pages 789-820.
    12. Stefan Hofmann & Andreas Wald & Ronald Gleich, 2012. "Determinants and effects of the diagnostic and interactive use of control systems: an empirical analysis on the use of budgets," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 153-182, December.
    13. Nikolaos Theriou & Vassilis Aggelidis, 2014. "Management Accounting Systems, Top Management Team’s Risk Characteristics and Their Effect on Strategic Change," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(2), pages 3-38.
    14. Jan Noeverman & Bas A.S. Koene & Roger Williams, 2005. "Construct measurement of evaluative style: a review and proposal," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 2(1), pages 77-107, April.
    15. Thomas Schaefer & Thomas Guenther, 2016. "Exploring strategic planning outcomes: the influential role of top versus middle management participation," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 205-249, May.
    16. Hall, Matthew, 2008. "The effect of comprehensive performance measurement systems on role clarity, psychological empowerment and managerial performance," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(2-3), pages 141-163.
    17. Sebastian Goebel & Barbara Weißenberger, 2016. "The Dark Side of Tight Financial Control: Causes and Remedies of Dysfunctional Employee Behaviors," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 17(1), pages 69-101, April.
    18. Bhimani, Alnoor & Sivabalan, Prabhu & Soonawalla, Kazbi, 2018. "A study of the linkages between rolling budget forms, uncertainty and strategy," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 306-323.
    19. Arnold, Markus & Artz, Martin, 2019. "The use of a single budget or separate budgets for planning and performance evaluation," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 50-67.
    20. Ewelina ZARZYCKA & Justyna DOBROSZEK & Cristina CIRCA & Alina ALMASAN, 2017. "The perceived suitability of management accounting information: a contingency based investigation," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 15(147), pages 395-395.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    M10; M31; M41;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:60:y:2008:i:7:d:10.1007_bf03372809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.