IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sjobre/v55y2003i1d10.1007_bf03372697.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unternehmenskultur und Innovationserfolg — Eine empirische Analyse

Author

Listed:
  • Holger Ernst

    (Wissenschaftliche Hochschule für Unternehmensführung (WHU))

Abstract

Summary A review of the literature on success factors for innovations reveals that a profound empirical study analyzing the relationship between corporate culture and innovative performance on the firm level is lacking to date. Based on a typology suggested in the literature for measuring corporate culture a contingency and efficiency model is derived to test the relationship between contingent factors, types of corporate culture and innovative performance. In order to test the validity of the suggested typology to measure corporate culture, a multiple informant approach is used. Assessments from respondents with different hierarchical and functional positions in 43 organizations are examined by means of Multi-Trait Multi-Method (MTMM) analyses. MTMM analysis leads to the identification of those respondents who make a valid assessment of corporate culture in their companies. The empirical results show that the type of corporate culture to be found in companies is dependent on environmental factors and that innovation-enhancing cultures have a positive impact on innovation success, whereas hierarchical cultures have a negative effect on innovation success.

Suggested Citation

  • Holger Ernst, 2003. "Unternehmenskultur und Innovationserfolg — Eine empirische Analyse," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 23-44, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:55:y:2003:i:1:d:10.1007_bf03372697
    DOI: 10.1007/BF03372697
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03372697
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF03372697?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven Tadelis & Oliver E.Williamson, 2012. "Transaction Cost Economics [The Handbook of Organizational Economics]," Introductory Chapters,, Princeton University Press.
    2. Robert E. Quinn & John Rohrbaugh, 1983. "A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: Towards a Competing Values Approach to Organizational Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 363-377, March.
    3. Pascale, Richard Tanner & Athos, Anthony G., 1981. "The art of Japanese management," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 83-85.
    4. Geert Hofstede, 1986. "Editorial: The Usefulness Of The ‘Organizational Culture’ Concept," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 253-257, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wolfgang H. Güttel, 2007. "Wissenstransfer in Organisationen: Koordinationsmechanismen und Anreizsysteme als Gestaltungsparameter," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 465-486, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rutaichanok Jingjit & Marianna Fotaki, 2010. "Confucian Ethics and the Limited Impact of the New Public Management Reform in Thailand," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 97(1), pages 61-73, December.
    2. Krickx, Guido A., 1995. "Vertical integration in the computer mainframe industry: A transaction cost interpretation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 75-91, January.
    3. Schmid, Andreas, 2007. "Incentive Compatibility and Efficiency in the contractual Insurer-Provider Relationship: Economic Theory and practical Implications: The Case of North Carolina," MPRA Paper 23311, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2008.
    4. Gunasekaran, Angappa & Irani, Zahir & Choy, King-Lun & Filippi, Lionel & Papadopoulos, Thanos, 2015. "Performance measures and metrics in outsourcing decisions: A review for research and applications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 153-166.
    5. Susan Velasco Portillo, 2015. "El agotamiento del régimen fordista boliviano y la financiarización de YPFB," Revista Lebret, Universidad Santo Tomás - Bucaramanga, vol. 7, pages 308-325, December.
    6. Andersson, Thomas, 1991. "Approaches to Partnerships Causing Asymmetries Between Japan and the West," Working Paper Series 320, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised Feb 1992.
    7. Paskalev, Zdravko & Yildirim, Huseyin, 2017. "A theory of outsourced fundraising: Why dollars turn into “Pennies for Charity”," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1-18.
    8. Simanchala Das & Biswajit Acharjya, 2021. "Understanding Organisational Effectiveness Through Sustainable Human Relations Approach: The Role of Empowerment Climate in Selected Industrial Establishments," International Journal of System Dynamics Applications (IJSDA), IGI Global, vol. 10(2), pages 33-52, April.
    9. Schneider, Christian O. & Bremen, Philipp & Schönsleben, Paul & Alard, Robert, 2013. "Transaction cost economics in global sourcing: Assessing regional differences and implications for performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 243-254.
    10. Steven F. Koch, 2005. "Love and Addiction: The Importance of Commitment," Working Papers 200516, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    11. K. Jin & Ronald Drozdenko, 2010. "Relationships among Perceived Organizational Core Values, Corporate Social Responsibility, Ethics, and Organizational Performance Outcomes: An Empirical Study of Information Technology Professionals," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 92(3), pages 341-359, March.
    12. Treur, Kim A.D. & Van Der Sluis, Lidewey E.C., 2005. "The Benefits of Coaching for Employees and their Organisations," Serie Research Memoranda 0013, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    13. A. Emre Demirci, 2013. "Strategic Representation of an Abstract Reality: Spiraling Relations between Organizational Culture and Innovativeness," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(3), pages 39-55, August.
    14. David E. Cantor & Tingting Yan & Mark Pagell & Wendy L. Tate, 2022. "From the editors: Introduction to the emerging discourse incubator on the topic of leveraging multiple types of resources within the supply network for competitive advantage," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 58(2), pages 3-7, April.
    15. Kshetri, Nir, 2016. "Big data’s role in expanding access to financial services in China," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 297-308.
    16. Yi-Ju Lo & Tung Hung, 2015. "Structure offshoring and returns on offshoring," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 443-479, June.
    17. Stephan Gundel & Achim Hecker, 2006. "Funding and operation of stadiums and arenas beside high-class leagues," Working Papers 0604, International Association of Sports Economists;North American Association of Sports Economists.
    18. T. Gries & R. Grundmann & I. Palnau & M. Redlin, 2017. "Innovations, growth and participation in advanced economies - a review of major concepts and findings," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 293-351, April.
    19. Jackie Krafft, 2006. "Business history and the organization of industry," Post-Print hal-00211780, HAL.
    20. Lydia Bals & Jon F. Kirchoff & Kai Foerstl, 2016. "Exploring the reshoring and insourcing decision making process: toward an agenda for future research," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 102-116, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    M14; O32;

    JEL classification:

    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:55:y:2003:i:1:d:10.1007_bf03372697. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.