IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sjecst/v158y2022i1d10.1186_s41937-022-00086-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The association between pharmaceutical innovation and both premature mortality and hospital utilization in Switzerland, 1996–2019

Author

Listed:
  • Frank R. Lichtenberg

    (Columbia University
    National Bureau of Economic Research
    CESifo)

Abstract

We analyze the association that pharmaceutical innovation had with premature mortality from all diseases in Switzerland during the period 1996–2018, and its association with hospital utilization for all diseases in Switzerland during the period 2002–2019. The analysis is performed by investigating whether the diseases that experienced more pharmaceutical innovation had larger subsequent declines in premature mortality and hospitalization. Pharmaceutical innovation is measured by the growth in the number of drugs used to treat a disease ever registered in Switzerland. Utilization of a chemical substance reaches a peak 9–12 years after it was first launched, and then declines. Our estimates indicate that the number of years of potential life lost before ages 85, 75, and 65 is significantly inversely related to the number of chemical substances ever registered 6–9, 3–9, and 0–9 years earlier, respectively. The new chemical substances that were registered during the period 1990–2011 are associated with reductions in the number of years of potential life lost before ages 85, 75, and 65 in 2018 of 257 thousand, 163 thousand, and 102 thousand, respectively. The number of hospital days is significantly inversely related to the number of chemical substances ever registered 8–10 years earlier. The new chemical substances that were registered during the period 1994–2010 are associated with reductions in the number of hospital days in 2019 of 2.07 million. Average length of inpatient hospital stays is significantly inversely related to the number of chemical substances ever registered 2–10 years earlier. The new chemical substances that were registered during the period 1999–2015 are associated with reductions in the average length of stays in 2019 of 0.4 days. Under the assumption that pharmaceutical innovation is exogenous with respect to premature mortality and hospitalization, and that it is uncorrelated with other potential determinants of health outcomes, if we ignore the reduction in hospital utilization associated with previous pharmaceutical innovation, a rough estimate of the cost per life-year before age 85 gained in 2018 is € 14,310. However, about 85% of the 2018 expenditure on drugs registered during the period 1990–2011 may have been offset by the reduction in expenditure on inpatient curative and rehabilitative care. The net cost per life-year before age 85 gained in 2018 may therefore have been € 2201.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank R. Lichtenberg, 2022. "The association between pharmaceutical innovation and both premature mortality and hospital utilization in Switzerland, 1996–2019," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, Springer;Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics, vol. 158(1), pages 1-24, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sjecst:v:158:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1186_s41937-022-00086-4
    DOI: 10.1186/s41937-022-00086-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s41937-022-00086-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s41937-022-00086-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frank R. Lichtenberg, 2014. "Has Medical Innovation Reduced Cancer Mortality?," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 60(1), pages 135-177.
    2. Valérie Paris & Elizabeth Docteur, 2007. "Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Policies in Switzerland," OECD Health Working Papers 27, OECD Publishing.
    3. Mark Bils, 2004. "Measuring the Growth from Better and Better Goods," NBER Working Papers 10606, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Charles I. Jones, 2019. "Paul Romer: Ideas, Nonrivalry, and Endogenous Growth," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 121(3), pages 859-883, July.
    5. Timothy F. Bresnahan & Robert J. Gordon, 1996. "Introduction to "The Economics of New Goods"," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of New Goods, pages 1-26, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Pierre Moïse & Elizabeth Docteur, 2007. "Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Policies in Sweden," OECD Health Working Papers 28, OECD Publishing.
    7. Timothy F. Bresnahan & Robert J. Gordon, 1996. "The Economics of New Goods," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number bres96-1.
    8. Jovanovic, Boyan & Yatsenko, Yuri, 2012. "Investment in vintage capital," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 147(2), pages 551-569.
    9. Pierre Moïse & Elizabeth Docteur, 2007. "Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Policies in Mexico," OECD Health Working Papers 25, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frank R. Lichtenberg, 2019. "How Many Life-Years Have New Drugs Saved? A 3-Way Fixed-Effects Analysis of 66 Diseases in 27 Countries, 2000-2013," NBER Working Papers 25483, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Nazila Yousefi & Mahyar Polroudi Moghaddam & Gita Afsharmanesh & Farzad Peiravian, 2020. "Evaluation of efficiency enhancement in Iran Health Insurance Organization: a policy brief for pharmaceutical cost containment," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(6), pages 1503-1511, November.
    3. Lichtenberg Frank R., 2018. "The Impact of New Drug Launches on Hospitalization in 2015 for 67 Medical Conditions in 15 OECD Countries: A Two-Way Fixed-Effects Analysis," Forum for Health Economics & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 21(2), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Kanavos, Panos, 2014. "Measuring performance in off-patent drug markets: A methodological framework and empirical evidence from twelve EU Member States," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(2), pages 229-241.
    5. Thomas D. Szucs & Martina Weiss & Guido Klaus, 2017. "The enigma of value: in search of affordable and accessible health care," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 18(6), pages 667-670, July.
    6. Charalabos-Markos Dintsios & Nadja Chernyak, 2022. "How Far is Germany From Value-Based Pricing 10 Years After the Introduction of AMNOG?," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 287-290, May.
    7. Melanie Levy, 2022. "The rise of the Swiss regulatory healthcare state: On preserving the just in the quest for the better (or less expensive?)," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 427-447, April.
    8. Lichtenberg, Frank R. & Tatar, Mehtap & Çalışkan, Zafer, 2014. "The effect of pharmaceutical innovation on longevity, hospitalization and medical expenditure in Turkey, 1999–2010," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(3), pages 361-373.
    9. Lianne Barnieh & Fiona Clement & Anthony Harris & Marja Blom & Cam Donaldson & Scott Klarenbach & Don Husereau & Diane Lorenzetti & Braden Manns, 2014. "A Systematic Review of Cost-Sharing Strategies Used within Publicly-Funded Drug Plans in Member Countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-10, March.
    10. Frank Lichtenberg, 2010. "The Contribution of Pharmaceutical Innovation to Longevity Growth in Germany and France," CESifo Working Paper Series 3095, CESifo.
    11. Frank Lichtenberg, 2012. "Contribution of Pharmaceutical Innovation to Longevity Growth in Germany and France, 2001–7," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 197-211, March.
    12. Frank R. Lichtenberg & Gautier Duflos, 2008. "Pharmaceutical innovation and the longevity of Australians: A first look," Advances in Health Economics and Health Services Research, in: Beyond Health Insurance: Public Policy to Improve Health, pages 95-117, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    13. Frank R. LICHTENBERG, 2018. "The Impact of New Drug Launch on Life-Years Lost in 2015 from 19 Types of Cancer in 36 Countries," JODE - Journal of Demographic Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 84(3), pages 309-354, September.
    14. Redding, Stephen & Weinstein, David, 2016. "A Unified Approach to Estimating Demand and Welfare," CEPR Discussion Papers 11421, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    15. Stephen J Redding & David E Weinstein, 2020. "Measuring Aggregate Price Indices with Taste Shocks: Theory and Evidence for CES Preferences," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 135(1), pages 503-560.
    16. Abe Dunn & Anne Hall & Seidu Dauda, 2022. "Are Medical Care Prices Still Declining? A Re‐Examination Based on Cost‐Effectiveness Studies," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(2), pages 859-886, March.
    17. Constantin Mang, 2016. "Market Consequences of ICT Innovations," ifo Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsforschung, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 70.
    18. Frank Lichtenberg, 2011. "The quality of medical care, behavioral risk factors, and longevity growth," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-34, March.
    19. Lichtenberg, Frank R., 2022. "The effect of pharmaceutical innovation on longevity: Evidence from the U.S. and 26 high-income countries," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    20. Frank R. Lichtenberg, 2006. "The Impact of New Laboratory Procedures and Other Medical Innovations on the Health of Americans, 1990-2003: Evidence from Longitudinal, Disease-Level Data," NBER Working Papers 12120, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sjecst:v:158:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1186_s41937-022-00086-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.