IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v108y2016i2d10.1007_s11192-016-1984-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Academic research in innovation: a country analysis

Author

Listed:
  • José M. Merigó

    () (University of Chile)

  • Christian A. Cancino

    () (University of Chile)

  • Freddy Coronado

    () (University of Chile)

  • David Urbano

    () (Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona)

Abstract

Abstract Many countries are investing a lot in innovation in order to modernize their economies. A key step in this process is the development of academic research in innovation. This article analyzes the leading countries in innovation research between 1989 and 2013 from an academic perspective. The aim of the study is to identify the most relevant countries in this field and the leading trends that are occurring during the last years. The work also introduces a general perspective analyzing the research developed in several supranational regions. The main advantage of this contribution is that it gives a global overview of the current academic state of the art in the area. The analysis focuses on the most productive and influential countries in innovation research classifying the results in periods of 5 years. The leading journals in the field are also studied individually identifying the most productive countries in each of the journals. The results show that the publications of each country are biased by the country origin of the journal. The USA and the UK are the leading countries in this field being the UK the most productive one in per capita terms among the big countries.

Suggested Citation

  • José M. Merigó & Christian A. Cancino & Freddy Coronado & David Urbano, 2016. "Academic research in innovation: a country analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(2), pages 559-593, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:108:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-016-1984-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-016-1984-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-016-1984-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fagerberg, Jan & Verspagen, Bart, 2009. "Innovation studies--The emerging structure of a new scientific field," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 218-233, March.
    2. Bertocchi, Graziella & Gambardella, Alfonso & Jappelli, Tullio & Nappi, Carmela A. & Peracchi, Franco, 2015. "Bibliometric evaluation vs. informed peer review: Evidence from Italy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 451-466.
    3. repec:spr:scient:v:102:y:2015:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1463-8 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Martin, Ben R., 2012. "The evolution of science policy and innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(7), pages 1219-1239.
    5. repec:spr:scient:v:105:y:2015:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-015-1747-7 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Fagerberg, Jan & Fosaas, Morten & Sapprasert, Koson, 2012. "Innovation: Exploring the knowledge base," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(7), pages 1132-1153.
    7. repec:spr:scient:v:88:y:2011:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-011-0390-1 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Philippe Mongeon & Adèle Paul-Hus, 2016. "The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(1), pages 213-228, January.
    9. Landström, Hans & Harirchi, Gouya & Åström, Fredrik, 2012. "Entrepreneurship: Exploring the knowledge base," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(7), pages 1154-1181.
    10. Alonso, S. & Cabrerizo, F.J. & Herrera-Viedma, E. & Herrera, F., 2009. "h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 273-289.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:spr:gjofsm:v:20:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s40171-018-0201-0 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:spr:scient:v:115:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-018-2709-7 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. repec:eee:ejores:v:262:y:2017:i:3:p:803-816 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:eee:jomega:v:73:y:2017:i:c:p:37-48 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. repec:spr:grdene:v:27:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s10726-018-9582-x is not listed on IDEAS
    6. repec:eee:transa:v:120:y:2019:i:c:p:188-223 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. repec:eee:jbrese:v:85:y:2018:i:c:p:281-294 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. repec:spr:nathaz:v:90:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-017-3040-y is not listed on IDEAS

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:108:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-016-1984-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Andrew Huffard) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Andrew Huffard to update the entry or send us the correct email address. General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.