IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opmare/v18y2025i1d10.1007_s12063-024-00534-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A behavioral perspective on visualization in manufacturing and operations management: a review, framework, and research agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Fabian Lindner

    (Zittau/Görlitz University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Business Administration and Engineering)

  • Gerald Reiner

    (Vienna University of Economics and Business, Department of Information Systems and Operations Management)

  • Sophia Keil

    (Zittau/Görlitz University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Business Administration and Engineering)

Abstract

Visualizations are ubiquitous in today's manufacturing operations, whether in the form of time series, scatter plots, flow charts, or dashboards. Managers, engineers, and shop-floor workers use visualizations to understand and act on production data for monitoring, problem solving, decision making, and strategy development. How we present the information we need influences our actions and behaviors. Therefore, we systematically review and analyze the current literature in manufacturing and operations management on visualizations and their relationship to behavioral operations in terms of social, cognitive, and emotional benefits as well as resulting performance improvements of production systems. Through content analysis of 64 papers from 1997 to 2023 across eight operational contexts and types of visualizations, we find typical purposes, benefits, and pitfalls where behavioral mechanisms are prevalent. Visualizations are used to facilitate knowledge explanation and sharing for improved communication and collaboration, or to reduce cognitive load and mental cost for increased quality and resource efficiency in task execution. The results are synthesized in an integrative framework that explains the links between visualizations and operations through their common behavioral mechanisms. We propose eight directions and map concrete hypotheses for future research in this area to promote the targeted development, deployment, and evaluation of visualizations in manufacturing considering behavioral and operational performance factors. Our study contributes to the emerging literature on visualizations in operations management, provides an overview and guidance for further efforts in this area, and helps practitioners reflect on and improve their design and use of visualizations, thereby advancing their management toolbox.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabian Lindner & Gerald Reiner & Sophia Keil, 2025. "A behavioral perspective on visualization in manufacturing and operations management: a review, framework, and research agenda," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 317-352, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:opmare:v:18:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12063-024-00534-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s12063-024-00534-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12063-024-00534-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12063-024-00534-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jihwan Lee & Yoo S. Hong, 2016. "Extraction and visualization of industrial service portfolios by text mining of 10-K annual reports," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 551-574, December.
    2. Snyder, Hannah, 2019. "Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 333-339.
    3. Martin Krajčovič & Gabriela Gabajová & Marián Matys & Beáta Furmannová & Ľuboslav Dulina, 2022. "Virtual Reality as an Immersive Teaching Aid to Enhance the Connection between Education and Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Stefan Kurpjuweit & Dagmar Reinerth & Christoph G. Schmidt & Stephan M. Wagner, 2019. "Implementing visual management for continuous improvement: barriers, success factors and best practices," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(17), pages 5574-5588, September.
    5. F R Førsund & S A C Kittelsen & V E Krivonozhko, 2009. "Farrell revisited–Visualizing properties of DEA production frontiers," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(11), pages 1535-1545, November.
    6. Emi Tanaka & Jessica Wai Yin Leung & Dianne Cook, 2022. "Commentary on “Visualization in Operations Management Research”: Incorporating Statistical Thinking into Visualization Practices for Decision Making in Operational Management," INFORMS Joural on Data Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(2), pages 188-191, October.
    7. Ambrogio Zanzi & Federico Andreotti & Valentina Vaglia & Sumer Alali & Francesca Orlando & Stefano Bocchi, 2021. "Forecasting Agroforestry Ecosystem Services Provision in Urban Regeneration Projects: Experiences and Perspectives from Milan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, February.
    8. Dorota Stadnicka & R.M. Chandima Ratnayake, 2017. "A VSM and VSA methodology for performance assessment of complex product manufacturing processes: an industrial case study," International Journal of Product Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 22(2), pages 104-134.
    9. Alexander P. Afanasiev & Vladimir E. Krivonozhko & Andrey V. Lychev & Oleg V. Sukhoroslov, 2020. "Multidimensional frontier visualization based on optimization methods using parallel computations," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 76(3), pages 563-574, March.
    10. Aurea Grané & Giancarlo Manzi & Silvia Salini, 2021. "Smart Visualization of Mixed Data," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-14, June.
    11. Maurice E. Schweitzer & Gérard P. Cachon, 2000. "Decision Bias in the Newsvendor Problem with a Known Demand Distribution: Experimental Evidence," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 404-420, March.
    12. Abderahman Rejeb & John G. Keogh & G. Keong Leong & Horst Treiblmaier, 2021. "Potentials and challenges of augmented reality smart glasses in logistics and supply chain management: a systematic literature review," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(12), pages 3747-3776, June.
    13. John Conlisk, 1996. "Why Bounded Rationality?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 34(2), pages 669-700, June.
    14. Yongwen Huang & Zuhua Jiang & Chengneng He & Jianfeng Liu & Bo Song & Lijun Liu, 2015. "A semantic-based visualised wiki system (SVWkS) for lesson-learned knowledge reuse situated in product design," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(8), pages 2524-2541, April.
    15. Christian Wankmüller & Gerald Reiner, 2020. "Coordination, cooperation and collaboration in relief supply chain management," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(2), pages 239-276, March.
    16. Scott Latham & Steven F. Tello, 2016. "Examining Entrepreneurs' Presentation Effectiveness in Generating Stakeholder Interest: Observations From the Medical Device Industry," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(1), pages 85-101, January.
    17. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    18. Sabrina Bresciani & Martin J. Eppler, 2015. "The Pitfalls of Visual Representations," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(4), pages 21582440156, October.
    19. Erik Lindskog & Johan Vallhagen & Björn Johansson, 2017. "Production system redesign using realistic visualisation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(3), pages 858-869, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maryono, Maryono & Killoes, Aditya Marendra & Adhikari, Rajendra & Abdul Aziz, Ammar, 2024. "Agriculture development through multi-stakeholder partnerships in developing countries: A systematic literature review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    2. Pomerlyan, Evgeniya & Belitski, Maksim, 2023. "Integration - Growth relationship: A literature review and future research agenda using a TCCM approach," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 1106-1118.
    3. Tim Rademaker & Ingo Klingenberg & Stefan Süß, 2025. "Leadership and technostress: a systematic literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 75(1), pages 429-494, February.
    4. Ubøe, Jan & Andersson, Jonas & Jörnsten, Kurt & Lillestøl, Jostein & Sandal, Leif K., 2014. "Probabilistic cost efficiency and bounded rationality in the newsvendor model," Discussion Papers 2014/41, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    5. Ubøe, Jan & Andersson, Jonas & Jörnsten, Kurt & Lillestøl, Jostein & Sandal, Leif, 2017. "Statistical testing of bounded rationality with applications to the newsvendor model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(1), pages 251-261.
    6. Xuanming Su, 2008. "Bounded Rationality in Newsvendor Models," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 566-589, May.
    7. Kusha Sharma & Dr. Madhuri Hooda, 2023. "The New Elective of National Cadet Corps (NCC): A Review of Literature," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(7), pages 384-396, July.
    8. Shuchi Pahuja & Anita Agrawal, 2023. "Board Attributes and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Perspectives," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 16(1), pages 108-138, June.
    9. Uchendu Eugene Chigbu & Sulaiman Olusegun Atiku & Cherley C. Du Plessis, 2023. "The Science of Literature Reviews: Searching, Identifying, Selecting, and Synthesising," Publications, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Appiah, Emmanuel Kusi & Gabrielsson, Peter & Rialp Criado, Alex, 2025. "The role of digitalization in early internationalization Research: A systematic literature review and future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    11. Hosany, A. R. Shaheen & Hosany, Sameer & He, Hongwei, 2022. "Children sustainable behaviour: A review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 236-257.
    12. Lenart-Gansiniec Regina, 2022. "The dilemmas of systematic literature review: the context of crowdsourcing in science," International Journal of Contemporary Management, Sciendo, vol. 58(1), pages 11-21, March.
    13. Chen, Jianxin & Zhang, Tonghua & Zhou, Yongwu, 2020. "Dynamics of a risk-averse newsvendor model with continuous-time delay in supply chain financing," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 133-148.
    14. Lydia Novoszel & Tina Wakolbinger, 2022. "Meta-analysis of Supply Chain Disruption Research," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-25, March.
    15. Lars Fuglsang & Anne Vorre Hansen & Ines Mergel & Maria Taivalsaari Røhnebæk, 2021. "Living Labs for Public Sector Innovation: An Integrative Literature Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, June.
    16. Jianbo Han & Edwin H. W. Chan & Esther H. K. Yung & Queena K. Qian & Patrick T. I. Lam, 2022. "A Policy Framework for Producing Age-Friendly Communities from the Perspective of Production of Space," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-23, February.
    17. Agnieszka A. Tubis & Honorata Poturaj & Anna Smok, 2024. "Interaction between a Human and an AGV System in a Shared Workspace—A Literature Review Identifying Research Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, January.
    18. Hetemäki, L. & D'Amato, D. & Giurca, A. & Hurmekoski, E., 2024. "Synergies and trade-offs in the European forest bioeconomy research: State of the art and the way forward," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    19. Vespestad, May Kristin & Clancy, Anne, 2021. "Exploring the use of content analysis methodology in consumer research," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    20. Biniam Getnet Agazu & Chalchissa Amentie Kero & Kenenisa Lemi Debela, 2025. "Transformational leadership and firm performance: a systematic literature review," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-28, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opmare:v:18:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12063-024-00534-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.