IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opmare/v17y2024i2d10.1007_s12063-023-00407-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A framework to evaluate the temporary hospital locations in wake of COVID-19 pandemic: implications to healthcare operations

Author

Listed:
  • Anchal Patil

    (International Management Institute New Delhi)

  • Vipulesh Shardeo

    (FORE School of Management)

  • Ashish Dwivedi

    (O.P. Jindal Global University)

  • Noor Ulain Rizvi

    (Curtin University Dubai)

  • Sanjoy Kumar Paul

    (University of Technology Sydney)

Abstract

The pandemic caused by coronavirus disease (COVID-19) endangered individuals and led to global disruptions. The pandemic strained the already overburdened Indian healthcare systems, resulting in a severe resource deficit. In response to the crisis, administrations nationwide started exploring locations to open temporary hospitals dedicated exclusively to COVID-19 patients. While previous literature has addressed the problem of hospital locations, the temporary hospital location problem (THLP) has yet to be addressed. Further, THLP is more complex in developing and populated countries such as India due to the magnified infection risk burden and limited resources. The selection of inappropriate locations has several disadvantages, including resource waste and critical delay, often resulting in the loss of human lives. Therefore, THLP becomes a significant decision-making problem that requires critical consideration of various factors to select temporary hospital locations. The present study proposes a framework and explores the factors affecting temporary hospital locations. This study employs the Best–Worst Method (BWM) to evaluate and rank the identified factors for choosing temporary hospital locations. The study's findings indicate that operational, social, and economic factors are the most influential. The most influential sub-factors are population density, staff availability, and support establishments. Finally, a case study is conducted to highlight the applications of the proposed framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Anchal Patil & Vipulesh Shardeo & Ashish Dwivedi & Noor Ulain Rizvi & Sanjoy Kumar Paul, 2024. "A framework to evaluate the temporary hospital locations in wake of COVID-19 pandemic: implications to healthcare operations," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 438-452, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:opmare:v:17:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s12063-023-00407-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s12063-023-00407-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12063-023-00407-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12063-023-00407-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amin Vafadarnikjoo & Madjid Tavana & Tiago Botelho & Konstantinos Chalvatzis, 2020. "A neutrosophic enhanced best–worst method for considering decision-makers’ confidence in the best and worst criteria," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 289(2), pages 391-418, June.
    2. Yunjia Ma & Wei Xu & Lianjie Qin & Xiujuan Zhao, 2019. "Site Selection Models in Natural Disaster Shelters: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-24, January.
    3. Chin-Tsai Lin & Meng-Chuan Tsai, 2010. "Location choice for direct foreign investment in new hospitals in China by using ANP and TOPSIS," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 375-390, February.
    4. Soheyl Khalilpourazari & Alireza Arshadi Khamseh, 2019. "Bi-objective emergency blood supply chain network design in earthquake considering earthquake magnitude: a comprehensive study with real world application," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 355-393, December.
    5. Noor Ulain Rizvi & Smita Kashiramka & Shveta Singh & Sushil, 2019. "A hierarchical model of the determinants of non-performing assets in banks: an ISM and MICMAC approach," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(35), pages 3834-3854, July.
    6. Vipulesh Shardeo & Anchal Patil & Jitender Madaan, 2020. "Critical Success Factors for Blockchain Technology Adoption in Freight Transportation Using Fuzzy ANP–Modified TISM Approach," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(06), pages 1549-1580, November.
    7. Sabbaghtorkan, Monir & Batta, Rajan & He, Qing, 2020. "Prepositioning of assets and supplies in disaster operations management: Review and research gap identification," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 1-19.
    8. Kılcı, Fırat & Kara, Bahar Yetiş & Bozkaya, Burçin, 2015. "Locating temporary shelter areas after an earthquake: A case for Turkey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(1), pages 323-332.
    9. Lin, Yen-Hung & Batta, Rajan & Rogerson, Peter A. & Blatt, Alan & Flanigan, Marie, 2012. "Location of temporary depots to facilitate relief operations after an earthquake," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 112-123.
    10. Rezaei, Jafar, 2016. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 126-130.
    11. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erkan Celik, 2024. "Analyzing the Shelter Site Selection Criteria for Disaster Preparedness Using Best–Worst Method under Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Ridvan Ertugrul Yildirim & Aziz Sisman, 2025. "Spatial Decision Support for Determining Suitable Emergency Assembly Places Using GIS and MCDM Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-28, March.
    3. Shu, Jia & Lv, Wenya & Na, Qing, 2021. "Humanitarian relief supply network design: Expander graph based approach and a case study of 2013 Flood in Northeast China," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    4. Afshin Kamyabniya & Antoine Sauré & F. Sibel Salman & Noureddine Bénichou & Jonathan Patrick, 2024. "Optimization models for disaster response operations: a literature review," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 46(3), pages 737-783, September.
    5. Ibarra-Rojas, O.J. & Ozuna, L. & López-Piñón, D., 2020. "The maximal covering location problem with accessibility indicators," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    6. James J. H. Liou & Perry C. Y. Liu & Huai-Wei Lo, 2020. "A Failure Mode Assessment Model Based on Neutrosophic Logic for Switched-Mode Power Supply Risk Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Liang, Fuqi & Brunelli, Matteo & Rezaei, Jafar, 2020. "Consistency issues in the best worst method: Measurements and thresholds," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    8. Salimi, Negin & Rezaei, Jafar, 2018. "Evaluating firms’ R&D performance using best worst method," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 147-155.
    9. Ravindra Singh Saluja & Varinder Singh, 2023. "Attribute-based characterization, coding, and selection of joining processes using a novel MADM approach," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 60(2), pages 616-655, June.
    10. Junli Zhang & Guoteng Wang & Zheng Xu & Zheren Zhang, 2022. "A Comprehensive Evaluation Method and Strengthening Measures for AC/DC Hybrid Power Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    11. Hamzeh Soltanali & Mehdi Khojastehpour & Siamak Kheybari, 2023. "Evaluating the critical success factors for maintenance management in agro-industries using multi-criteria decision-making techniques," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 949-968, June.
    12. Yossi Hadad & Baruch Keren & Dima Alberg, 2023. "An Expert System for Ranking and Matching Electric Vehicles to Customer Specifications and Requirements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-18, May.
    13. Ebrahim Sharifi & Saman Hassanzadeh Amin & Liping Fang, 2025. "Assessing sustainability of food supply chains by using a novel method integrating group multi-criteria decision-making and interval Type-2 fuzzy set," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 3665-3705, February.
    14. Vieira, Fabiana C. & Ferreira, Fernando A.F. & Govindan, Kannan & Ferreira, Neuza C.M.Q.F. & Banaitis, Audrius, 2022. "Measuring urban digitalization using cognitive mapping and the best worst method (BWM)," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    15. Besharati Fard, Moein & Moradian, Parisa & Emarati, Mohammadreza & Ebadi, Mehdi & Gholamzadeh Chofreh, Abdoulmohammad & Klemeŝ, Jiří Jaromír, 2022. "Ground-mounted photovoltaic power station site selection and economic analysis based on a hybrid fuzzy best-worst method and geographic information system: A case study Guilan province," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    16. Abderahman Rejeb & Karim Rejeb & John G. Keogh & Suhaiza Zailani, 2022. "Barriers to Blockchain Adoption in the Circular Economy: A Fuzzy Delphi and Best-Worst Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-23, March.
    17. Negin Salimi & Jafar Rezaei, 2016. "Measuring efficiency of university-industry Ph.D. projects using best worst method," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(3), pages 1911-1938, December.
    18. Chun-Chieh Tseng & Jun-Yi Zeng & Min-Liang Hsieh & Chih-Hung Hsu, 2022. "Analysis of Innovation Drivers of New and Old Kinetic Energy Conversion Using a Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Model in the Post-COVID-19 Era: A Chinese Case," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(20), pages 1-25, October.
    19. Tavana, Madjid & Khalili Nasr, Arash & Mina, Hassan & Michnik, Jerzy, 2022. "A private sustainable partner selection model for green public-private partnerships and regional economic development," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    20. Jairo Ortega & Sarbast Moslem & János Tóth & Tamás Péter & Juan Palaguachi & Mario Paguay, 2020. "Using Best Worst Method for Sustainable Park and Ride Facility Location," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opmare:v:17:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s12063-023-00407-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.