IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opmare/v17y2024i1d10.1007_s12063-023-00431-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mechanisms as boundary objects for connecting design with science in operations management research

Author

Listed:
  • Leandro Gauss

    (Unisinos)

  • Daniel P. Lacerda

    (Unisinos)

  • A. Georges L. Romme

    (Eindhoven University of Technology)

Abstract

Substantial progress has been made toward connecting design with science in operations management (OM) studies. However, this connection appears to be lopsided, with much more emphasis on theory-to-practice than practice-to-theory in applications of design science (DS). This imbalance tends to impede theoretical progress. To mitigate this imbalance, this paper explores the notion of mechanisms as boundary objects between design and science. First, we outline the problem-solving cycle of DS and the research products it generates. Subsequently, we elaborate on mechanisms, mechanism-based explanations, and law-statements, and how these concepts inform the products of DS research. The argument then turns to how causal mechanisms can be inferred in the DS problem-solving cycle. Finally, we propose a framework for closing the self-reinforcing loop between science and design, which allows OM scholars to more effectively produce practical outputs as well as theoretical breakthroughs.

Suggested Citation

  • Leandro Gauss & Daniel P. Lacerda & A. Georges L. Romme, 2024. "Mechanisms as boundary objects for connecting design with science in operations management research," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 291-306, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:opmare:v:17:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s12063-023-00431-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s12063-023-00431-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12063-023-00431-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12063-023-00431-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Georges L. Romme & Gerard Endenburg, 2006. "Construction Principles and Design Rules in the Case of Circular Design," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 287-297, April.
    2. Herbert A. Simon, 1967. "The BUSINESS SCHOOL A PROBLEM IN ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(1), pages 1-16, February.
    3. John Antonakis & Samuel Bendahan & Philippe Jacquart & Rafael Lalive, 2010. "On making causal claims : A review and recommendations," Post-Print hal-02313119, HAL.
    4. Joan E. van Aken, 2004. "Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field‐Tested and Grounded Technological Rules," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 219-246, March.
    5. Gauss, Leandro & Lacerda, Daniel P. & Cauchick Miguel, Paulo A., 2022. "Market-Driven Modularity: Design method developed under a Design Science paradigm," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    6. Romme, A. Georges L. & Reymen, Isabelle M.M.J., 2018. "Entrepreneurship at the interface of design and science: Toward an inclusive framework," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 10(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Herbert A. Simon, 1996. "The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd Edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262691914, December.
    8. Yearworth, Mike & White, Leroy, 2013. "The uses of qualitative data in multimethodology: Developing causal loop diagrams during the coding process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(1), pages 151-161.
    9. Telles, Eduardo Santos & Lacerda, Daniel Pacheco & Morandi, Maria Isabel Wolf Motta & Piran, Fabio Antonio Sartori, 2020. "Drum-buffer-rope in an engineering-to-order system: An analysis of an aerospace manufacturer using data envelopment analysis (DEA)," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    10. Russell L. Ackoff, 1981. "The Art and Science of Mess Management," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 11(1), pages 20-26, February.
    11. Ramzi Mabsout, 2015. "Abduction and economics: the contributions of Charles Peirce and Herbert Simon," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 491-516, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ali Marjovi & Behrouz Zarei, 2023. "Design-oriented policy interventions: The case of technology-based international entrepreneurship in emerging context," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 111-142, March.
    2. Madhavan, Ravi & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2011. "Evidence-Based Management in "Macro" Areas: The Case of Strategic Management," Working Papers 11-0105, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    3. Dalila Cisco Collatto & Aline Dresch & Daniel Pacheco Lacerda & Ione Ghislene Bentz, 2018. "Is Action Design Research Indeed Necessary? Analysis and Synergies Between Action Research and Design Science Research," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 239-267, June.
    4. van Burg, E. & Gilsing, V.A. & Reymen, I.M.M.J. & Romme, A.G.L., 2008. "Creating university spin-offs : A science-based design perspective," Other publications TiSEM ed13609d-fde4-43dc-ba8a-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Stefan Heusinkveld & Armand Smits, 2025. "Where do maverick organization design ideas come from? Approaches to studying the development of organizational design knowledge," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 14(1), pages 51-60, March.
    6. A. Georges L. Romme & John Bell & Guus Frericks, 2023. "Designing a deep-tech venture builder to address grand challenges and overcome the valley of death," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 12(4), pages 217-237, December.
    7. Paul C. Fenema & A. Georges L. Romme, 2020. "Latent organizing for responding to emergencies: foundations for research," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Xinya You, 2025. "Management as a design practice: a multi-case study on designing value co-creation mechanisms," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-30, December.
    9. Bullinger, Bernadette & Kieser, Alfred & Schiller-Merkens, Simone, 2015. "Coping with institutional complexity: Responses of management scholars to competing logics in the field of management studies," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 437-450.
    10. Richard Baskerville & Jan Pries-Heje, 2010. "Explanatory Design Theory," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 2(5), pages 271-282, October.
    11. Kapasi, Isla & Rosli, Ainurul, 2020. "The practice of “we”: A framework for balancing rigour and relevance in entrepreneurship scholarship," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 14(C).
    12. Du, Yunzhou & Liu, Qiuchen & Kim, Phillip H. & Meuer, Johannes, 2024. "Studying complex causal processes in technological innovation and entrepreneurship with set-theoretic mediation models," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    13. Spender, J. C., 2024. "Simon and Knight," MPRA Paper 120891, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Andreas Drechsler & Stefan Weißschädel, 2018. "An IT strategy development framework for small and medium enterprises," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 93-124, February.
    15. Ari Hyytinen & Petri Rouvinen & Mika Pajarinen & Joosua Virtanen, 2023. "Ex Ante Predictability of Rapid Growth: A Design Science Approach," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(6), pages 2465-2493, November.
    16. Sarooghi, Hessam & AdelRastkhiz, Seyedeh Elahe & Hornsby, Jeffrey, 2021. "Heterogeneity of entrepreneurial opportunities as design artifacts: A business model perspective," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 16(C).
    17. Gerard P. Hodgkinson & Denise M. Rousseau, 2009. "Bridging the Rigour–Relevance Gap in Management Research: It's Already Happening!," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 534-546, May.
    18. Thinley Tharchen & Raghu Garud & Rebecca L. Henn, 2020. "Design as an interactive boundary object," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 9(1), pages 1-34, December.
    19. Blanka, Christine & Krumay, Barbara & Rueckel, David, 2022. "The interplay of digital transformation and employee competency: A design science approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    20. Orlando Durán & Paulo Afonso & Vinicius Minatogawa, 2020. "Analysis of Long-Term Impact of Maintenance Policy on Maintenance Capacity Using a Time-Driven Activity-Based Life-Cycle Costing," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-24, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opmare:v:17:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s12063-023-00431-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.