IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jobuve/v14y2020ics2352673420300585.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The practice of “we”: A framework for balancing rigour and relevance in entrepreneurship scholarship

Author

Listed:
  • Kapasi, Isla
  • Rosli, Ainurul

Abstract

The rigour-relevance divide remains a longstanding concern for the entrepreneurship field. In this article we elucidate the practice of “we” in entrepreneurship scholarship and propose a means to encourage and realise it. Our contribution is in the combination of reflection (content reflection, process reflection, and premise reflection) and design science phases; thus, we develop and outline the concept and communal practice of entrepreneurial scholarship informed by a structured reflection framework. Our original model and related framework detail a series of overlapping phases of inquiry and questioning, demonstrating how can we work together with non-academics to collectively strengthen the relevance of entrepreneurship scholarship and, ultimately, be more accountable and relevant to those whom we research.

Suggested Citation

  • Kapasi, Isla & Rosli, Ainurul, 2020. "The practice of “we”: A framework for balancing rigour and relevance in entrepreneurship scholarship," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 14(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jobuve:v:14:y:2020:i:c:s2352673420300585
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352673420300585
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00202?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Herbert A. Simon, 1967. "The BUSINESS SCHOOL A PROBLEM IN ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(1), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Arnaldo Camuffo & Alessandro Cordova & Alfonso Gambardella & Chiara Spina, 2020. "A Scientific Approach to Entrepreneurial Decision Making: Evidence from a Randomized Control Trial," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(2), pages 564-586, February.
    3. Zahra, Shaker A., 2007. "Contextualizing theory building in entrepreneurship research," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 443-452, May.
    4. Romme, A. Georges L. & Reymen, Isabelle M.M.J., 2018. "Entrepreneurship at the interface of design and science: Toward an inclusive framework," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 10(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Van Looy, Bart & Ranga, Marina & Callaert, Julie & Debackere, Koenraad & Zimmermann, Edwin, 2004. "Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 425-441, April.
    6. Gaylen N. Chandler & Douglas W. Lyon, 2001. "Issues of Research Design and Construct Measurement in Entrepreneurship Research: The past Decade," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 25(4), pages 101-113, July.
    7. Kati Tikkamäki & Päivi Heikkilä & Mari Ainasoja, 2016. "Positive Stress and Reflective Practice Among Entrepreneurs," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 12(1), pages 35-55.
    8. Selden, Paul D. & Fletcher, Denise E., 2019. "The tacit knowledge of entrepreneurial design: Interrelating theory, practice and prescription in entrepreneurship research," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 11(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Teppo Felin & Todd R. Zenger, 2017. "The Theory-Based View: Economic Actors as Theorists," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(4), pages 258-271, December.
    10. Tim Kastelle & Sarah King & Martie-Louise Verreynne & Peter Kambouris, 2018. "Experiences using a science-based Lean LaunchPad program and its impact on national innovation system evolution," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 35(3), pages 356-370.
    11. Sarasvathy, Saras D., 2004. "The questions we ask and the questions we care about: reformulating some problems in entrepreneurship research," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 707-717, September.
    12. Ding, Thomas, 2019. "Understanding the design of opportunities: Re-evaluating the agent-opportunity nexus through a design lens," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 11(C), pages 1-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hyytinen, Ari, 2021. "Shared problem solving and design thinking in entrepreneurship research," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 16(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hyytinen, Ari, 2021. "Shared problem solving and design thinking in entrepreneurship research," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 16(C).
    2. Ari Hyytinen & Petri Rouvinen & Mika Pajarinen & Joosua Virtanen, 2023. "Ex Ante Predictability of Rapid Growth: A Design Science Approach," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(6), pages 2465-2493, November.
    3. Chan Timothy Hor, Shoon, 2023. "Why we need design science in entrepreneurship research an idiosyncratic perspective based on the experiences and learnings of an ex-practitioner in training to be an entrepreneurship scholar," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    4. Tan, Justin & Yang, Jun & Veliyath, Rajaram, 2009. "Particularistic and system trust among small and medium enterprises: A comparative study in China's transition economy," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 544-557, November.
    5. Gambardella, Alfonso & Camuffo, Arnaldo & Spina, Chiara, 2020. "Small Changes with Big Impact: Experimental Evidence of a Scientific Approach to the Decision-Making of Entrepreneurial Firms," CEPR Discussion Papers 14909, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. Sara Carter, 2011. "The Rewards of Entrepreneurship: Exploring the Incomes, Wealth, and Economic Well–Being of Entrepreneurial Households," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(1), pages 39-55, January.
    7. Mirela Octavia Sîrbu & Constantin Bob & Andreea Simona Saseanu, 2015. "Entrepreneurs’ Perception of Their Skills and the Influence of Education on the Romanian Entrepreneurial System," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(Special 9), pages 1213-1213, November.
    8. Zellmer-Bruhn, Mary E. & Forbes, Daniel P. & Sapienza, Harry J. & Borchert, Patricia S., 2021. "Lab, Gig or Enterprise? How scientist-inventors form nascent startup teams," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(1).
    9. Forsström-Tuominen, Heidi & Jussila, Iiro & Kolhinen, Johanna, 2015. "Business school students’ social construction of entrepreneurship: Claiming space for collective entrepreneurship discourses," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 102-120.
    10. Brian L. Connelly & R.D. Ireland & Christopher R. Reutzel & Joseph E. Coombs, 2010. "The Power and Effects of Entrepreneurship Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(1), pages 131-149, January.
    11. Sarooghi, Hessam & AdelRastkhiz, Seyedeh Elahe & Hornsby, Jeffrey, 2021. "Heterogeneity of entrepreneurial opportunities as design artifacts: A business model perspective," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 16(C).
    12. Antonio Dottore & Suleiman Kassicieh, 2014. "University Patent Holders as Entrepreneurs: Factors that Influence Spinout Activity," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 5(4), pages 863-891, December.
    13. Thomas Kenworthy & W. Edward McMullan, 2013. "Finding Practical Knowledge in Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 37(5), pages 983-997, September.
    14. Woolley Jennifer L., 2011. "Studying the Emergence of New Organizations: Entrepreneurship Research Design," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-28, January.
    15. Timo Ehrig & Jens Schmidt, 2022. "Theory‐based learning and experimentation: How strategists can systematically generate knowledge at the edge between the known and the unknown," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(7), pages 1287-1318, July.
    16. Golshan Javadian & Crystal Dobratz & Alka Gupta & Vishal K. Gupta & Jeffrey A. Martin, 2020. "Qualitative Research in Entrepreneurship Studies: A State-of-Science," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 29(2), pages 223-258, September.
    17. Zellweger, Thomas & Zenger, Todd, 2022. "Entrepreneurs as scientists, Bayesian inference, and belief revision," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 18(C).
    18. Peter W. Moroz & Kevin Hindle, 2012. "Entrepreneurship as a Process: Toward Harmonizing Multiple Perspectives," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 36(4), pages 781-818, July.
    19. Ehrig, Timo & Foss, Nicolai J., 2022. "Why we need normative theories of entrepreneurial learning that go beyond Bayesianism," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 18(C).
    20. Silvia Sanasi, 2023. "Entrepreneurial experimentation in business model dynamics: Current understanding and future opportunities," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 805-836, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jobuve:v:14:y:2020:i:c:s2352673420300585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-business-venturing-insights .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.