IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/operea/v17y2017i2d10.1007_s12351-016-0232-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Train timetabling at rapid rail transit lines: a robust multi-objective stochastic programming approach

Author

Listed:
  • Erfan Hassannayebi

    (Tarbiat Modares University)

  • Seyed Hessameddin Zegordi

    (Tarbiat Modares University)

  • Mohammad Reza Amin-Naseri

    (Tarbiat Modares University)

  • Masoud Yaghini

    (Iran University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

In the setting of public transportation system, improving the service quality as well as robustness against uncertainty through minimizing the total waiting times of passengers is a real issue. This study proposed robust multi-objective stochastic programming models for train timetabling problem in urban rail transit lines. The objective is to minimize the expected value of the passenger waiting times, its variance and the penalty cost function including the capacity violation due to overcrowding. In the proposed formulations, the dynamic and uncertain travel demand is represented by the scenario-based time-varying arrival rates and alighting ratio at stops. Two versions of the robust stochastic programming models are developed and a comparative analysis is conducted to testify the tractability of the models. The effectiveness of the proposed stochastic programming model is demonstrated through the application to line 5 of Tehran underground railway. The outcomes validate the benefits of implementing robust timetables for rail industry. The computational experiments shows significant reductions in expected passenger waiting time of 21.27 %, and cost variance drop of 59.98 % for the passengers, through the proposed robust mathematical modeling approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Erfan Hassannayebi & Seyed Hessameddin Zegordi & Mohammad Reza Amin-Naseri & Masoud Yaghini, 2017. "Train timetabling at rapid rail transit lines: a robust multi-objective stochastic programming approach," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 435-477, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:17:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s12351-016-0232-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s12351-016-0232-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12351-016-0232-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12351-016-0232-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Avriel & A. C. Williams, 1970. "The Value of Information and Stochastic Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(5), pages 947-954, October.
    2. Yan, Shangyao & Lin, Jenn-Rong & Lai, Chun-Wei, 2013. "The planning and real-time adjustment of courier routing and scheduling under stochastic travel times and demands," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 34-48.
    3. Yan, Shangyao & Chi, Chin-Jen & Tang, Ching-Hui, 2006. "Inter-city bus routing and timetable setting under stochastic demands," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(7), pages 572-586, August.
    4. Trozzi, Valentina & Gentile, Guido & Bell, Michael G.H. & Kaparias, Ioannis, 2013. "Dynamic user equilibrium in public transport networks with passenger congestion and hyperpaths," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 266-285.
    5. Eberlein, Xu Jun & Wilson, Nigel H. M. & Barnhart, Cynthia & Bernstein, David, 1998. "The real-time deadheading problem in transit operations control," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 77-100, February.
    6. List, George F. & Wood, Bryan & Nozick, Linda K. & Turnquist, Mark A. & Jones, Dean A. & Kjeldgaard, Edwin A. & Lawton, Craig R., 2003. "Robust optimization for fleet planning under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 209-227, May.
    7. Yu, Chian-Son & Li, Han-Lin, 2000. "A robust optimization model for stochastic logistic problems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1-3), pages 385-397, March.
    8. D'Ariano, Andrea & Pacciarelli, Dario & Pranzo, Marco, 2007. "A branch and bound algorithm for scheduling trains in a railway network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(2), pages 643-657, December.
    9. Huimin Niu & Minghui Zhang, 2012. "An Optimization to Schedule Train Operations with Phase-Regular Framework for Intercity Rail Lines," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2012, pages 1-13, November.
    10. Meng, Lingyun & Zhou, Xuesong, 2011. "Robust single-track train dispatching model under a dynamic and stochastic environment: A scenario-based rolling horizon solution approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 1080-1102, August.
    11. Lai, K.K. & Wang, Ming & Liang, L., 2007. "A stochastic approach to professional services firms' revenue optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(3), pages 971-982, November.
    12. John M. Mulvey & Robert J. Vanderbei & Stavros A. Zenios, 1995. "Robust Optimization of Large-Scale Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 264-281, April.
    13. Laguna, Manuel & Lino, Pilar & Perez, Angeles & Quintanilla, Sacramento & Valls, Vicente, 2000. "Minimizing weighted tardiness of jobs with stochastic interruptions in parallel machines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(2), pages 444-457, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pu, Song & Zhan, Shuguang, 2021. "Two-stage robust railway line-planning approach with passenger demand uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    2. Javid Jouzdani & Mohammad Fathian & Ahmad Makui & Mehdi Heydari, 2020. "Robust design and planning for a multi-mode multi-product supply network: a dairy industry case study," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1811-1840, September.
    3. Xue, Hongjiao & Jia, Limin & Li, Jian & Guo, Jianyuan, 2022. "Jointly optimized demand-oriented train timetable and passenger flow control strategy for a congested subway line under a short-turning operation pattern," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 593(C).
    4. Meloni, Carlo & Pranzo, Marco & Samà, Marcella, 2021. "Risk of delay evaluation in real-time train scheduling with uncertain dwell times," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shangyao Yan & Ching-Hui Tang, 2008. "An Integrated Framework for Intercity Bus Scheduling Under Stochastic Bus Travel Times," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(3), pages 318-335, August.
    2. Yan, Shangyao & Tang, Ching-Hui, 2009. "Inter-city bus scheduling under variable market share and uncertain market demands," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 178-192, February.
    3. Yan, Shangyao & Tang, Ching-Hui, 2007. "A heuristic approach for airport gate assignments for stochastic flight delays," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(2), pages 547-567, July.
    4. Yelin Fu & Jianshan Sun & K. Lai & John Leung, 2015. "A robust optimization solution to bottleneck generalized assignment problem under uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 233(1), pages 123-133, October.
    5. Gao, Yuan & Kroon, Leo & Schmidt, Marie & Yang, Lixing, 2016. "Rescheduling a metro line in an over-crowded situation after disruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 425-449.
    6. Yelin Fu & Kin Keung Lai & Liang Liang, 2016. "A robust optimisation approach to the problem of supplier selection and allocation in outsourcing," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 913-918, March.
    7. M. Shakibayifar & A. Sheikholeslami & F. Corman & E. Hassannayebi, 2020. "An integrated rescheduling model for minimizing train delays in the case of line blockage," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 59-87, March.
    8. Tsai, Jung-Fa, 2007. "An optimization approach for supply chain management models with quantity discount policy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 982-994, March.
    9. Antonio G. Martín & Manuel Díaz-Madroñero & Josefa Mula, 2020. "Master production schedule using robust optimization approaches in an automobile second-tier supplier," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(1), pages 143-166, March.
    10. König, Eva & Schön, Cornelia, 2021. "Railway delay management with passenger rerouting considering train capacity constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(2), pages 450-465.
    11. Ulrich Dorndorf & Florian Jaehn & Erwin Pesch, 2017. "Flight gate assignment and recovery strategies with stochastic arrival and departure times," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(1), pages 65-93, January.
    12. Golpîra, Hêriş & Khan, Syed Abdul Rehman, 2019. "A multi-objective risk-based robust optimization approach to energy management in smart residential buildings under combined demand and supply uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1113-1129.
    13. Xu, Y. & Huang, G.H. & Qin, X.S. & Cao, M.F., 2009. "SRCCP: A stochastic robust chance-constrained programming model for municipal solid waste management under uncertainty," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(6), pages 352-363.
    14. Meloni, Carlo & Pranzo, Marco & Samà, Marcella, 2021. "Risk of delay evaluation in real-time train scheduling with uncertain dwell times," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    15. Azaron, A. & Brown, K.N. & Tarim, S.A. & Modarres, M., 2008. "A multi-objective stochastic programming approach for supply chain design considering risk," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 129-138, November.
    16. Xie, Y.L. & Huang, G.H. & Li, W. & Ji, L., 2014. "Carbon and air pollutants constrained energy planning for clean power generation with a robust optimization model—A case study of Jining City, China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 150-167.
    17. Aalaei, Amin & Davoudpour, Hamid, 2017. "A robust optimization model for cellular manufacturing system into supply chain management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PC), pages 667-679.
    18. Masoud Hekmatfar & M. R. M. Aliha & Mir Saman Pishvaee & Tomasz Sadowski, 2023. "A Robust Flexible Optimization Model for 3D-Layout of Interior Equipment in a Multi-Floor Satellite," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-41, December.
    19. Chen, Zebin & Li, Shukai & D’Ariano, Andrea & Yang, Lixing, 2022. "Real-time optimization for train regulation and stop-skipping adjustment strategy of urban rail transit lines," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    20. Javid Jouzdani & Mohammad Fathian & Ahmad Makui & Mehdi Heydari, 2020. "Robust design and planning for a multi-mode multi-product supply network: a dairy industry case study," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1811-1840, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:17:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s12351-016-0232-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.