IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v120y2024i5d10.1007_s11069-023-06363-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Landslide susceptibility mapping and risk assessment using total estimated susceptibility values along NH44 in Jammu and Kashmir, Western Himalaya

Author

Listed:
  • Riyaz Ahmad Mir

    (Naional Institute of Hydrology, Western Himalayan Regional Centre
    Geological Survey of India, UTs: Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh)

  • Zahid Habib

    (Geological Survey of India, UTs: Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh)

  • Ajay Kumar

    (Geological Survey of India, UTs: Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh)

  • Nadeem Ahmad Bhat

    (Geological Survey of India, UTs: Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh)

Abstract

Domain-specific mesoscale landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) and risk assessment was carried out along National Highway (NH44) of Jammu and Kashmir, Western Himalaya. The methodology proposed in this study broadly consist three stages including the (1) pre-field component for preliminary thematic map preparation, (2) field component for ground data collection and validation, and (3) post-field component for data updating, processing, and integration. High-resolution Earth Observation (EO) images (Cartosat-DEM-10 m, Cartosat-1 PAN image-2.5 m, Google Earth image-4 m) and other ancillary datasets (SoI topographic, and geological maps) supplemented with extensive field survey were used to generate main causative geo-factor maps for analysis. Slope facet used as a basic unit of mapping preliminarily classified the area into rocky (65.7%) and overburden covered (34.2%) slopes, respectively. An updated inventory of 117 landslide incidence zones comprising 50 debris slides, 34 rockfalls, 20 rock slides, 5 rock topples, 2 debris flows and 6 old slide zones was generated. Depending upon the type and nature of material involved in the slope failure, facets were further classified into debris slide domain, rock slide domain, cut-slope domain and no slide domain for detailed analysis and treatment. The geo-factor maps were weighted using knowledge driven ratings for each factor class as per domain-specific facet using Landslide Susceptibility Estimated Rating (LSER) scheme. The sum up of LSER values for individual causative factors calculated the Total Estimated Susceptibility Values (TESV) that classified the entire area into low, moderate and high susceptibility classes covering an area of 39.8%, 40.0% and 20.1%, respectively. The validation of LSM against high-resolution landslide inventory indicated a higher level of performance of the adopted methodology for the study area. About 80.0% and 10.4% of slope failure incidences coincided perfectly well with high and moderate susceptibility classes. Moreover, the human settlements, agriculture land, roads and bridges, stone crushers and other strategic civil structures (i.e., tunnels, electric line poles and towers, etc.) are the main elements at high risk in the area.

Suggested Citation

  • Riyaz Ahmad Mir & Zahid Habib & Ajay Kumar & Nadeem Ahmad Bhat, 2024. "Landslide susceptibility mapping and risk assessment using total estimated susceptibility values along NH44 in Jammu and Kashmir, Western Himalaya," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(5), pages 4257-4296, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s11069-023-06363-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-023-06363-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-023-06363-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-023-06363-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s11069-023-06363-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.