IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metrik/v17y2006i2p155-176.html

Perspektiven der Balanced Scorecard: Eine theoretisch-konzeptionelle Analyse zur Auswahl geeigneter Balanced Scorecard-Perspektiven für Kreditinstitute

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Körnert

Abstract

The four perspectives of Kaplan/Norton's balanced scorecard often prevent an individualized adaptation of the balanced scorecard. While empirical findings indicate problems of adaptation in several industries, the literature misses theoretical concepts in order to identify relevant perspectives in the balanced scorecard. The shareholder value approach, the stakeholder approach and the general system theory are helpful instruments to identify relevant balanced scorecard perspectives. Moreover, with the help of Deppe's approved management approach for banks one can develop balanced scorecard perspectives for the banking industry in general. Balanced scorecard perspectives for industries are an essential intermediate stage in the process of establishing balanced scorecard perspectives unique to the company involved. Copyright Springer-Verlag 2006

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Körnert, 2006. "Perspektiven der Balanced Scorecard: Eine theoretisch-konzeptionelle Analyse zur Auswahl geeigneter Balanced Scorecard-Perspektiven für Kreditinstitute," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 155-176, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:metrik:v:17:y:2006:i:2:p:155-176
    DOI: 10.1007/s00187-006-0164-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00187-006-0164-8
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00187-006-0164-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael C. Jensen, 2010. "Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 22(1), pages 32-42, January.
    2. Myers, Stewart C, 1974. "Interactions of Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions-Implications for Capital Budgeting," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 29(1), pages 1-25, March.
    3. Kring, Thorn, 2003. "Erfolgreiche Strategieumsetzung: Leitfaden zur Implementierung der Balanced Scorecard in Genossenschaftsbanken," Arbeitspapiere 35, University of Münster, Institute for Cooperatives.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chilosi, Alberto & Damiani, Mirella, 2007. "Stakeholders vs. shareholders in corporate governance," MPRA Paper 2334, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Fabrizio Rossi & Maretno Agus Harjoto, 2020. "Corporate non-financial disclosure, firm value, risk, and agency costs: evidence from Italian listed companies," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 1149-1181, October.
    3. Alfred C. Korir & Prof. Thomas Cheruiyot, PhD & Prof. Philip Bii, 2025. "The Effect of Board Tenure and CEO Duality on Firm Performance of Companies Listed in Nairobi’s Stock Exchange," European Journal of Business and Strategic Management, International Peer Review Journals and Books, vol. 10(5), pages 31-43.
    4. Schauten Marc B. J., 2013. "Three discount methods for valuing projects and the required return on equity," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 58(1), pages 63-85, enero-mar.
    5. Maha Faisal Alsayegh & Rashidah Abdul Rahman & Saeid Homayoun, 2020. "Corporate Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability Performance Transformation through ESG Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Peter Brusov & Tatiana Filatova & Natali Orekhova, 2023. "Capital Structure Theory: Past, Present, Future," Springer Books, in: The Brusov–Filatova–Orekhova Theory of Capital Structure, chapter 0, pages 9-50, Springer.
    7. Dipanita Deb & Philippe Gillet & Philippe Bernard & Anupam De, 2025. "Examining the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on the Financial Performance of Indian Companies," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 14(4), pages 521-539, August.
    8. Mara Del Baldo, 2012. "Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance in Italian SMEs: the experience of some “spirited businesses”," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 16(1), pages 1-36, February.
    9. repec:dau:papers:123456789/1059 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Ahmed A. Elamer & Mounia Boulhaga, 2024. "ESG controversies and corporate performance: The moderating effect of governance mechanisms and ESG practices," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 3312-3327, July.
    11. Scholtens, Bert, 2008. "A note on the interaction between corporate social responsibility and financial performance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1-2), pages 46-55, December.
    12. Haseeb Ahmed Shabbir & Hala Maalouf & Michele Griessmair & Nazan Colmekcioglu & Pervaiz Akhtar, 2019. "Exploring Perceptions of Advertising Ethics: An Informant-Derived Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(3), pages 727-744, October.
    13. Alnoor Bhimani, 2008. "Making corporate governance count: the fusion of ethics and economic rationality," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 12(2), pages 135-147, May.
    14. Thomas Maak & Nicola M. Pless & Christian Voegtlin, 2016. "Business Statesman or Shareholder Advocate? CEO Responsible Leadership Styles and the Micro-Foundations of Political CSR," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 463-493, May.
    15. Massimiliano Cerciello & Francesco Busato & Simone Taddeo, 2023. "The effect of sustainable business practices on profitability. Accounting for strategic disclosure," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 802-819, March.
    16. Abderrahman Jahmane & Pierre Louart, 2013. "La Responsabilité Sociale de l'Entreprise : une diversité des concepts, des enjeux multiples et imbriqués et diverses méthodes de mesure," Post-Print hal-01898797, HAL.
    17. Sonia Boukattaya & Zyed Achour & Zeineb Hlioui, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Financial Performance: An Empirical Literature Review," Post-Print hal-03472433, HAL.
    18. Marc Bollecker & Pierre Mathieu & Claude Clementz, 2006. "Le Comportement Socialement Responsable Des Entreprises : Une Lecture Des Travaux En Comptabilite Et Contrôle De Gestion Dans Une Perspective Neo-Institutionnaliste," Post-Print halshs-00769052, HAL.
    19. Elizabeth-Anne Thomas, 2019. "How Useful Is the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Reporting Framework to Identify the Non-financial Value of Corporate Social Performance (CSP)?," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Nicholas Capaldi & Samuel O. Idowu & René Schmidpeter & Martin Brueckner (ed.), Responsible Business in Uncertain Times and for a Sustainable Future, pages 37-87, Springer.
    20. Charlotte Ostergaard & Ibolya Schindele & Bent Vale, 2016. "Social Capital and the Viability of Stakeholder-Oriented Firms: Evidence from Savings Banks," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 20(5), pages 1673-1718.
    21. Erik G. Hansen & Stefan Schaltegger, 2018. "Sustainability Balanced Scorecards and their Architectures: Irrelevant or Misunderstood?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 937-952, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metrik:v:17:y:2006:i:2:p:155-176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.