IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jtrsec/v18y2025i1d10.1007_s12198-025-00302-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What makes a port safe? A multi-criteria analysis from captains’ standpoint using BBWM and MARCOS

Author

Listed:
  • Mehmet Gurturk

    (Canakkale 18 Mart University
    Istanbul University)

  • Erkan Celik

    (Istanbul University)

Abstract

Ports are significant for global trade. With the advances of technology, greener ports, and human knowledge, ports aim to become safer. However, a negative situation at ports can cause disruptions to the supply chain, financial crises, and even national security crises. The human standpoint is crucial for port safety. Port safety requires identifying and understanding the risks and implementing the necessary procedures. Captains play a vital role in the safer berthing of ships in port, utilizing their knowledge and experience. The aim of this study is to identify the criteria that impact port safety from the captains' perspective and to assess ports in relation to these criteria. In this context, Bayesian BWM (BBWM) and MARCOS methods were used to weight the criteria and rank the ports. Based on the results, the most important main criteria is the Human criteria. The least important criteria are the Meteorologic criteria. According to the captains, among the Ambarli, Antwerp, Los Angeles, Melbourne, Salalah, and Shanghai ports, Antwerp is considered the safest port, while Salalah is deemed the least safe.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehmet Gurturk & Erkan Celik, 2025. "What makes a port safe? A multi-criteria analysis from captains’ standpoint using BBWM and MARCOS," Journal of Transportation Security, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 1-28, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jtrsec:v:18:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12198-025-00302-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s12198-025-00302-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12198-025-00302-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12198-025-00302-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Milovan KovaÄ & Snežana Tadić & Mladen Krstić & Mouhamed Bayane Bouraima & Borna Abramović, 2021. "Novel Spherical Fuzzy MARCOS Method for Assessment of Drone-Based City Logistics Concepts," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-17, December.
    2. Gul, Muhammet & Yucesan, Melih, 2022. "Performance evaluation of Turkish Universities by an integrated Bayesian BWM-TOPSIS model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    3. Halit Serdar Saner & Melih Yucesan & Muhammet Gul, 2022. "A Bayesian BWM and VIKOR-based model for assessing hospital preparedness in the face of disasters," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 111(2), pages 1603-1635, March.
    4. Zhuola Zhang & Shiyuan Lin & Yingjin Ye & Zhao Xu & Yihang Zhao & Huiru Zhao & Jingqi Sun, 2022. "A Hybrid MCDM Model for Evaluating the Market-Oriented Business Regulatory Risk of Power Grid Enterprises Based on the Bayesian Best-Worst Method and MARCOS Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Hani Alyami & Paul Tae-Woo Lee & Zaili Yang & Ramin Riahi & Stephen Bonsall & Jin Wang, 2014. "An advanced risk analysis approach for container port safety evaluation," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(7), pages 634-650, December.
    6. Göçmen Polat, Elifcan & Yücesan, Melih & Gül, Muhammet, 2023. "A comparative framework for criticality assessment of strategic raw materials in Turkey," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    7. Fahim, Patrick B.M. & Rezaei, Jafar & Montreuil, Benoit & Tavasszy, Lorant, 2022. "Port performance evaluation and selection in the Physical Internet," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 83-94.
    8. Mohammed H. Alshareef & Bassam M. Aljahdali & Ayman F. Alghanmi & Hussain T. Sulaimani, 2024. "Spatial Analysis and Risk Evaluation for Port Crisis Management Using Integrated Soft Computing and GIS-Based Models: A Case Study of Jazan Port, Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-24, June.
    9. Wan-Chi Jackie Hsu & Huai-Wei Lo & Chin-Cheng Yang, 2021. "The Formulation of Epidemic Prevention Work of COVID-19 for Colleges and Universities: Priorities and Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Vukašin Pajić & Milan Andrejić & Marijana Jolović & Milorad Kilibarda, 2024. "Strategic Warehouse Location Selection in Business Logistics: A Novel Approach Using IMF SWARA–MARCOS—A Case Study of a Serbian Logistics Service Provider," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, March.
    11. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    12. Meizhi Jiang & Jing Lu & Zhuohua Qu & Zaili Yang, 2022. "Safety evaluation of the ports along the Maritime Silk Road," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(6), pages 797-819, August.
    13. Alptekin Ulutaş & Darjan Karabasevic & Gabrijela Popovic & Dragisa Stanujkic & Phong Thanh Nguyen & Çağatay Karaköy, 2020. "Development of a Novel Integrated CCSD-ITARA-MARCOS Decision-Making Approach for Stackers Selection in a Logistics System," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-15, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Göçmen Polat, Elifcan & Yücesan, Melih & Gül, Muhammet, 2023. "A comparative framework for criticality assessment of strategic raw materials in Turkey," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    2. Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani & Ramin Bazrafshan & Fatih Ecer & Çağlar Karamaşa, 2022. "The Suitability-Feasibility-Acceptability Strategy Integrated with Bayesian BWM-MARCOS Methods to Determine the Optimal Lithium Battery Plant Located in South America," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(14), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Karadag, Mehmet & Gul, Muhammet & Yucesan, Melih & Ortiz-Barrios, Miguel & Ishizaka, Alessio & Khan, Jehangir, 2025. "Evaluation of Green Deal compliance performance with a hybrid comparative multi-attribute decision model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    4. Mladen Krstić & Giulio Paolo Agnusdei & Pier Paolo Miglietta & Snežana Tadić & Violeta Roso, 2022. "Applicability of Industry 4.0 Technologies in the Reverse Logistics: A Circular Economy Approach Based on COmprehensive Distance Based RAnking (COBRA) Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-30, May.
    5. Halit Serdar Saner & Melih Yucesan & Muhammet Gul, 2022. "A Bayesian BWM and VIKOR-based model for assessing hospital preparedness in the face of disasters," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 111(2), pages 1603-1635, March.
    6. Ayşe Pınar Özyılmaz & Fehmi Samet Demirci & Ozan Okudan & Zeynep Işık, 2025. "Developing Performance Measurement Framework for Sustainable Facility Management (SFM) in Office Buildings Using Bayesian Best Worst Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-26, July.
    7. Amoozad Mahdiraji, Hannan & Sharifpour Arabi, Hojatallah & Duan, Keru & Vrontis, Demetris, 2025. "Harnessing technological resources for effective growth hacking: A mixed-method framework using systematic literature review, content analysis, and multi-layer decision-Making," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    8. Weijie Wu & Dongwei Li & Hui Sun & Yixin Li & Yining Zhang & Mingrui Zhao, 2024. "Building a Sustainable Future: A Three-Stage Risk Management Model for High-Permeability Power Grid Engineering," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-23, July.
    9. James J. H. Liou & Perry C. Y. Liu & Huai-Wei Lo, 2020. "A Failure Mode Assessment Model Based on Neutrosophic Logic for Switched-Mode Power Supply Risk Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Zarei, Esmaeil & Khan, Faisal & Abbassi, Rouzbeh, 2021. "Importance of human reliability in process operation: A critical analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    11. Paul, Ananna & Shukla, Nagesh & Trianni, Andrea, 2023. "Modelling supply chain sustainability challenges in the food processing sector amid the COVID-19 outbreak," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    12. Liang, Fuqi & Brunelli, Matteo & Rezaei, Jafar, 2020. "Consistency issues in the best worst method: Measurements and thresholds," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    13. Martín-García, Jaime & Gómez-Limón, José A. & Arriaza, Manuel, 2024. "Conversion to organic farming: Does it change the economic and environmental performance of fruit farms?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    14. Juuso Pajasmaa & Kaisa Miettinen & Johanna Silvennoinen, 2025. "Group Decision Making in Multiobjective Optimization: A Systematic Literature Review," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 329-371, April.
    15. Salimi, Negin & Rezaei, Jafar, 2018. "Evaluating firms’ R&D performance using best worst method," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 147-155.
    16. Željko Stević & Irena Đalić & Dragan Pamučar & Zdravko Nunić & Slavko Vesković & Marko Vasiljević & Ilija Tanackov, 2019. "A new hybrid model for quality assessment of scientific conferences based on Rough BWM and SERVQUAL," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(1), pages 1-30, April.
    17. Wu, Xingli & Liao, Huchang, 2021. "Modeling personalized cognition of customers in online shopping," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    18. Ravindra Singh Saluja & Varinder Singh, 2023. "Attribute-based characterization, coding, and selection of joining processes using a novel MADM approach," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 60(2), pages 616-655, June.
    19. Zheng Yuan & Baohua Wen & Cheng He & Jin Zhou & Zhonghua Zhou & Feng Xu, 2022. "Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis to Rural Spatial Sustainability Evaluation: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-31, May.
    20. Kavitha, S. & Satheeshkumar, J. & Amudha, T., 2024. "Multi-label feature selection using q-rung orthopair hesitant fuzzy MCDM approach extended to CODAS," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 148-173.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jtrsec:v:18:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12198-025-00302-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.