IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joiaen/v11y2022i1d10.1186_s13731-022-00229-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder interdependencies in a collaborative innovation project

Author

Listed:
  • Iqra Sadaf Khan

    (University of Oulu)

  • Osmo Kauppila

    (University of Oulu
    Luleå University of Technology)

  • Noureen Fatima

    (Barani Institute of Management Sciences)

  • Jukka Majava

    (University of Oulu)

Abstract

Industry 4.0—also known as the modern industrial revolution—nurtures close collaboration between various organizations so that they can come together for innovation. While aiming for digital transformation through such innovation, these organizations form certain interdependencies due to the pool of resources and tasks they agree to share to reach both common and independent goals. To understand those interdependencies, we studied a national innovation project in Finland called “Reboot IoT Factory,” which leveraged several resources, processes, and practices to successfully combine modern technologies in manufacturing in a competitive and sustainable way. The participants included in the project were factories, research organizations, and small and medium enterprises (SMEs). An actor dependency model was used to analyze the observed interdependencies through survey and interview data. The results showed strong goal, task, and resource dependencies between the participants. A conventional understanding of advantages and opportunities, such as increased experience sharing and possible long-term synergies, is elaborated; moreover, an analysis of the disadvantages and risks caused by interdependencies, such as delays in tasks and possible inefficiency through unnecessary complexity, is also conducted.

Suggested Citation

  • Iqra Sadaf Khan & Osmo Kauppila & Noureen Fatima & Jukka Majava, 2022. "Stakeholder interdependencies in a collaborative innovation project," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joiaen:v:11:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1186_s13731-022-00229-0
    DOI: 10.1186/s13731-022-00229-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s13731-022-00229-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s13731-022-00229-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Mosse, 1994. "Authority, Gender and Knowledge: Theoretical Reflections on the Practice of Participatory Rural Appraisal," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 25(3), pages 497-526, July.
    2. Jacob Torfing, 2019. "Collaborative innovation in the public sector: the argument," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 1-11, January.
    3. Daniel Kiel & Julian M. Müller & Christian Arnold & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2017. "Sustainable Industrial Value Creation: Benefits And Challenges Of Industry 4.0," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(08), pages 1-34, December.
    4. Ravnborg, Helle Munk & Westermann, Olaf, 2002. "Understanding interdependencies: stakeholder identification and negotiation for collective natural resource management," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 41-56, July.
    5. Dalenogare, Lucas Santos & Benitez, Guilherme Brittes & Ayala, Néstor Fabián & Frank, Alejandro Germán, 2018. "The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 383-394.
    6. Barbara C. Crosby & Paul ‘t Hart & Jacob Torfing, 2017. "Public value creation through collaborative innovation," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(5), pages 655-669, May.
    7. Piotr F. Borowski, 2021. "Innovation strategy on the example of companies using bamboo," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Agrawal, Arun & Gibson, Clark C., 1999. "Enchantment and Disenchantment: The Role of Community in Natural Resource Conservation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 629-649, April.
    9. Mansia Sadyrova & Kuanish Yusupov & Bibigul Imanbekova, 2021. "Innovation processes in Kazakhstan: development factors," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Reginald Masocha, 2018. "Does Environmental Sustainability Impact Innovation, Ecological and Social Measures of Firm Performance of SMEs? Evidence from South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-11, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rabab H. Saleh & Christopher M. Durugbo & Soud M. Almahamid, 2023. "What makes innovation ambidexterity manageable: a systematic review, multi-level model and future challenges," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(8), pages 3013-3056, November.
    2. Anna Tenhunen-Lunkka & Riitta Honkanen, 2024. "Project coordination success factors in European Union-funded research, development and innovation projects under the Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe programmes," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-26, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacob Torfing & Eva Sørensen, 2019. "Interactive Political Leadership in Theory and Practice: How Elected Politicians May Benefit from Co-Creating Public Value Outcomes," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Li, Ying & Dai, Jing & Cui, Li, 2020. "The impact of digital technologies on economic and environmental performance in the context of industry 4.0: A moderated mediation model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    3. Sangyun Han & Soo Kyung Park & Kyu Tae Kwak, 2021. "Workforce Composition of Public R&D and Performance: Evidence from Korean Government-Funded Research Institutes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Bai, Chunguang & Dallasega, Patrick & Orzes, Guido & Sarkis, Joseph, 2020. "Industry 4.0 technologies assessment: A sustainability perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    5. Mahanty, Sanghamitra, 2002. "Conservation and Development Interventions as Networks: The Case of the India Ecodevelopment Project, Karnataka," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 30(8), pages 1369-1386, August.
    6. Ada Scupola & Lars Fuglsang & Faiz Gallouj & Anne Vorre Hansen, 2021. "Understandings of Social Innovation within the Danish Public Sector: A Literature Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Cugno, Monica & Castagnoli, Rebecca & Büchi, Giacomo, 2021. "Openness to Industry 4.0 and performance: The impact of barriers and incentives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    8. Muawia Ramadan & Tariq Amer & Bashir Salah & Mohammed Ruzayqat, 2022. "The Impact of Integration of Industry 4.0 and Internal Organizational Forces on Sustaining Competitive Advantages and Achieving Strategic Objectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, May.
    9. Büchi, Giacomo & Cugno, Monica & Castagnoli, Rebecca, 2020. "Smart factory performance and Industry 4.0," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    10. Liu, Yanping & Farooque, Muhammad & Lee, Chang-Hun & Gong, Yu & Zhang, Abraham, 2023. "Antecedents of circular manufacturing and its effect on environmental and financial performance: A practice-based view," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    11. Manu Sharma & Anil Kumar & Sunil Luthra & Sudhanshu Joshi & Arvind Upadhyay, 2022. "The impact of environmental dynamism on low‐carbon practices and digital supply chain networks to enhance sustainable performance: An empirical analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1776-1788, May.
    12. Tortorella, Guilherme Luz & Saurin, Tarcísio Abreu & Fogliatto, Flavio S. & Rosa, Valentina M. & Tonetto, Leandro M & Magrabi, Farah, 2021. "Impacts of Healthcare 4.0 digital technologies on the resilience of hospitals," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    13. Desmarchelier, Benoît & Djellal, Faridah & Gallouj, Faïz, 2021. "Which innovation regime for public service innovation networks for social innovation (PSINSIs)? Lessons from a European cases database," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    14. Frederike Marie Oschinsky & Hans Christian Klein & Bjoern Niehaves, 2022. "Invite everyone to the table, but not to every course," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 1925-1941, December.
    15. Battistoni, Elisa & Gitto, Simone & Murgia, Gianluca & Campisi, Domenico, 2023. "Adoption paths of digital transformation in manufacturing SME," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    16. Wen-Hsien Tsai & Yin-Hwa Lu, 2018. "A Framework of Production Planning and Control with Carbon Tax under Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-24, September.
    17. Mariani, Marcello & Borghi, Matteo, 2019. "Industry 4.0: A bibliometric review of its managerial intellectual structure and potential evolution in the service industries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    18. Ravnborg, Helle Munk & Westermann, Olaf, 2002. "Understanding interdependencies: stakeholder identification and negotiation for collective natural resource management," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 41-56, July.
    19. Grybauskas, Andrius & Stefanini, Alessandro & Ghobakhloo, Morteza, 2022. "Social sustainability in the age of digitalization: A systematic literature Review on the social implications of industry 4.0," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    20. Eva Sørensen & Jacob Torfing, 2022. "Co‐creating ambitious climate change mitigation goals: The Copenhagen experience," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 572-587, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joiaen:v:11:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1186_s13731-022-00229-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.