IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joecth/v76y2023i1d10.1007_s00199-022-01454-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Walrasian objection mechanism and Mas-Colell’s bargaining set in economies with many commodities

Author

Listed:
  • Niccolò Urbinati

    (Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia)

Abstract

We study the Walrasian objection mechanism in the framework of economies with a measure space of agents and a separable Banach space of commodities whose positive cone has a non-empty interior. We provide several characterizations of Walrasian objections and use them to study the bargaining set of the economy, as defined in Mas-Colell (J Math Econ 18(2):129–139, 1989). Our main result shows that whenever the measure space of agents is saturated, every non-competitive allocation can be blocked with a Walrasian objection. This implies that the bargaining set, the core and the set of competitive allocations are equivalent solution concepts.

Suggested Citation

  • Niccolò Urbinati, 2023. "The Walrasian objection mechanism and Mas-Colell’s bargaining set in economies with many commodities," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 76(1), pages 45-68, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joecth:v:76:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s00199-022-01454-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s00199-022-01454-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00199-022-01454-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00199-022-01454-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schjodt, Ulla & Sloth, Birgitte, 1994. "Bargaining Sets with Small Coalitions," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 23(1), pages 49-55.
    2. Xiang Sun & Yongchao Zhang, 2015. "Pure-strategy Nash equilibria in nonatomic games with infinite-dimensional action spaces," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 58(1), pages 161-182, January.
    3. Dutta, Bhaskar & Ray, Debraj & Sengupta, Kunal & Vohra, Rajiv, 1989. "A consistent bargaining set," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 93-112, October.
    4. Hyo Seok Jang & Sangjik Lee, 2019. "Equilibria in a large production economy with an infinite dimensional commodity space and price dependent preferences," Papers 1904.07444, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2020.
    5. Armstrong, Thomas E. & Richter, Marcel K., 1984. "The core-walras equivalence," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 116-151, June.
    6. Konrad Podczeck, 2003. "Core and Walrasian equilibria when agents' characteristics are extremely dispersed," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 22(4), pages 699-725, November.
    7. Robert M. Anderson & Walter Trockel & Lin Zhou, 1997. "Nonconvergence of the Mas-Colell and Zhou Bargaining Sets," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 65(5), pages 1227-1240, September.
    8. Robert M. Anderson & Haosui Duanmu & M. Ali Khan & Metin Uyanik, 2022. "Walrasian equilibrium theory with and without free-disposal: theorems and counterexamples in an infinite-agent context," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 73(2), pages 387-412, April.
    9. Mas-Colell, Andreu, 1989. "An equivalence theorem for a bargaining set," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 129-139, April.
    10. Khan, M. Ali & Sagara, Nobusumi, 2016. "Relaxed large economies with infinite-dimensional commodity spaces: The existence of Walrasian equilibria," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 95-107.
    11. Javier Hervés-Estévez & Emma Moreno-García, 2015. "On restricted bargaining sets," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 44(3), pages 631-645, August.
    12. Michael Greinecker & Konrad Podczeck, 2013. "Liapounoff’s vector measure theorem in Banach spaces and applications to general equilibrium theory," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 1(2), pages 157-173, November.
    13. Konard Podczeck, 1997. "Markets with infinitely many commodities and a continuum of agents with non-convex preferences (*)," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 9(3), pages 385-426.
    14. Shitovitz, Benyamin, 1989. "The bargaining set and the core in mixed markets with atoms and an atomless sector," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 377-383, September.
    15. Podczeck, Konrad, 2008. "On the convexity and compactness of the integral of a Banach space valued correspondence," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(7-8), pages 836-852, July.
    16. Jang, Hyo Seok & Lee, Sangjik, 2020. "Equilibria in a large production economy with an infinite dimensional commodity space and price dependent preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 57-64.
    17. Takashi Suzuki, 2020. "Fundamentals of General Equilibrium Analysis," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 11808, February.
    18. Grodal, Birgit, 1972. "A Second Remark on the Core of an Atomless Economy," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 40(3), pages 581-583, May.
    19. Hara, Chiaki, 2002. "The anonymous core of an exchange economy," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(1-2), pages 91-116, September.
    20. Vohra, Rajiv, 1991. "An existence theorem for a bargaining set," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 19-34.
    21. Ostroy, Joseph M & Zame, William R, 1994. "Nonatomic Economies and the Boundaries of Perfect Competition," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 62(3), pages 593-633, May.
    22. Michael Greinecker & Konrad Podczeck, 2016. "Edgeworth’s conjecture and the number of agents and commodities," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 62(1), pages 93-130, June.
    23. Javier Hervés-Estévez & Emma Moreno-García, 2018. "A limit result on bargaining sets," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 66(2), pages 327-341, August.
    24. Martellotti, Anna, 2008. "Finitely additive economies with free extremely desirable commodities," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(5-6), pages 535-549, April.
    25. Bhowmik, Anuj & Centrone, Francesca & Martellotti, Anna, 2019. "Coalitional extreme desirability in finitely additive economies with asymmetric information," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 83-93.
    26. Lee, Sangjik, 2013. "Competitive Equilibrium With An Atomless Measure Space Of Agents And Infinite Dimensional Commodity Spaces Without Convex And Complete Preferences," Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, Hitotsubashi University, vol. 54(2), pages 221-230, December.
    27. Shitovitz, Benyamin, 1973. "Oligopoly in Markets with a Continuum of Traders," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 41(3), pages 467-501, May.
    28. Noguchi, Mitsunori, 1997. "Economies with a continuum of consumers, a continuum of suppliers and an infinite dimensional commodity space," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 1-21, February.
    29. Sun, Yeneng & Yannelis, Nicholas C., 2008. "Saturation and the integration of Banach valued correspondences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(7-8), pages 861-865, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Niccolò Urbinati, 2020. "Walrasian objection mechanism and Mas Colell's bargaining set in economies with many commodities," Working Papers 07, Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    2. He, Wei & Sun, Yeneng, 2022. "Conditional expectation of Banach valued correspondences and economic applications," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    3. Jang, Hyo Seok & Lee, Sangjik, 2020. "Equilibria in a large production economy with an infinite dimensional commodity space and price dependent preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 57-64.
    4. Hervés-Estévez, Javier & Moreno-García, Emma, 2015. "A bargaining-Walras approach for finite economies," MPRA Paper 69802, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Bhowmik, Anuj & Saha, Sandipan, 2023. "Restricted bargaining sets in a club economy," MPRA Paper 119210, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Graziano, Maria Gabriella & Pesce, Marialaura & Urbinati, Niccolò, 2020. "Generalized coalitions and bargaining sets," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 80-89.
    7. Bhowmik, Anuj & Graziano, Maria Gabriella, 2015. "On Vind’s theorem for an economy with atoms and infinitely many commodities," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 26-36.
    8. Hervés-Estévez, Javier & Moreno-García, Emma, 2014. "On bargaining sets for finite economies," MPRA Paper 62303, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 18 Jul 2014.
    9. Bernard Cornet & V. Filipe Martins-Da-Rocha, 2021. "Fatou's Lemma for Unbounded Gelfand Integrable Mappings," Post-Print hal-03506933, HAL.
    10. Khan, M. Ali & Sagara, Nobusumi, 2016. "Relaxed large economies with infinite-dimensional commodity spaces: The existence of Walrasian equilibria," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 95-107.
    11. Javier Hervés-Estévez & Emma Moreno-García, 2015. "On restricted bargaining sets," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 44(3), pages 631-645, August.
    12. Hervés-Estévez, Javier & Moreno-García, Emma, 2012. "Some remarks on restricted bargaining sets," MPRA Paper 39385, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Jun 2012.
    13. Hervés-Estévez, Javier & Moreno-García, Emma, 2018. "Bargaining set with endogenous leaders: A convergence result," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 10-13.
    14. Massimiliano Amarante & Luigi Montrucchio, 2007. "Mas-Colell Bargaining Set of Large Games," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 63, Collegio Carlo Alberto.
    15. Suzuki, Takashi, 2013. "Core and competitive equilibria of a coalitional exchange economy with infinite time horizon," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 234-244.
    16. Hervés-Beloso, Carlos & Hervés-Estévez, Javier & Moreno-García, Emma, 2018. "Bargaining sets in finite economies," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 93-98.
    17. Avishay Aiche, 2019. "On the equal treatment imputations subset in the bargaining set for smooth vector-measure games with a mixed measure space of players," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 48(2), pages 411-421, June.
    18. Chiara Donnini & Marialaura Pesce, 2021. "Fairness and fuzzy coalitions," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 50(4), pages 1033-1052, December.
    19. Maria Gabriella Graziano & Marialaura Pesce & Niccolo Urbinati, 2023. "The Equitable Bargaining Set," CSEF Working Papers 676, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.
    20. Bhowmik, Anuj & Centrone, Francesca & Martellotti, Anna, 2019. "Coalitional extreme desirability in finitely additive economies with asymmetric information," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 83-93.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Walrasian objections; Bargaining set; Infinite dimensional commodity spaces; Saturation property; Lyapunov’s theorem;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C62 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Existence and Stability Conditions of Equilibrium
    • D41 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Perfect Competition
    • D51 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Exchange and Production Economies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joecth:v:76:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s00199-022-01454-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.