IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joamsc/v52y2024i1d10.1007_s11747-023-00932-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Let’s face it: When and how facial emojis increase the persuasiveness of electronic word of mouth

Author

Listed:
  • Tobias Maiberger

    (Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
    Darmstadt University of Applied Sciences)

  • David Schindler

    (Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg)

  • Nicole Koschate-Fischer

    (Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg)

Abstract

Facial emojis have increasingly permeated electronic word of mouth (eWOM), but the persuasive consequences of this phenomenon remain unclear. Drawing on emotions as social information (EASI) theory, this research reveals that facial emojis influence persuasion (e.g., product choice) by affecting emotional arousal and perceived ambiguity. While the effect through emotional arousal is generally positive, the effect through ambiguity depends on the emojis’ function in eWOM: facial emojis that replace a verbal expression increase ambiguity and therefore reduce persuasion, whereas those that reiterate a verbal expression decrease ambiguity and therefore enhance persuasion. Both the emotional-arousal and ambiguity pathways determine the net persuasive effect. This research also explores two situations (high verbal context richness and eWOM from strong ties) where replacing facial emojis can increase persuasion. Finally, the authors show that facial emojis’ persuasive power is generalizable to online brand communications, influencing key management outcomes such as click-through rates for digital ads.

Suggested Citation

  • Tobias Maiberger & David Schindler & Nicole Koschate-Fischer, 2024. "Let’s face it: When and how facial emojis increase the persuasiveness of electronic word of mouth," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 119-139, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joamsc:v:52:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11747-023-00932-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11747-023-00932-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11747-023-00932-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11747-023-00932-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Smith, Leah Warfield & Rose, Randall L., 2020. "Service with a smiley face: Emojional contagion in digitally mediated relationships," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 301-319.
    2. Ana Babić Rosario & Kristine Valck & Francesca Sotgiu, 2020. "Conceptualizing the electronic word-of-mouth process: What we know and need to know about eWOM creation, exposure, and evaluation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 422-448, May.
    3. John Hulland & Mark Houston, 2021. "The importance of behavioral outcomes," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 437-440, May.
    4. Carter Morgan & Tatiana M. Fajardo & Claudia Townsend, 2021. "Show it or say it: how brand familiarity influences the effectiveness of image-based versus text-based logos," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 566-583, May.
    5. Yinlong Zhang & Lawrence Feick & Vikas Mittal, 2014. "How Males and Females Differ in Their Likelihood of Transmitting Negative Word of Mouth," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(6), pages 1097-1108.
    6. Das, Gopal & Wiener, Hillary J.D. & Kareklas, Ioannis, 2019. "To emoji or not to emoji? Examining the influence of emoji on consumer reactions to advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 147-156.
    7. Bashirzadeh, Yashar & Mai, Robert & Faure, Corinne, 2022. "How rich is too rich? Visual design elements in digital marketing communications," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 58-76.
    8. Jordan W. Moffett & Judith Anne Garretson Folse & Robert W. Palmatier, 2021. "A theory of multiformat communication: mechanisms, dynamics, and strategies," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 441-461, May.
    9. McShane, Lindsay & Pancer, Ethan & Poole, Maxwell & Deng, Qi, 2021. "Emoji, Playfulness, and Brand Engagement on Twitter," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 96-110.
    10. Yashar Bashirzadeh & Robert Mai & Corinne Faure, 2022. "How rich is too rich? Visual design elements in digital marketing communications," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-03603041, HAL.
    11. Xinshu Zhao & John G. Lynch & Qimei Chen, 2010. "Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(2), pages 197-206, August.
    12. A. Peter McGraw & Caleb Warren & Christina Kan, 2015. "Humorous Complaining," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(5), pages 1153-1171.
    13. Wu, Ruijuan & Chen, Jiuqi & Lu Wang, Cheng & Zhou, Liying, 2022. "The influence of emoji meaning multipleness on perceived online review helpfulness: The mediating role of processing fluency," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 299-307.
    14. Andrew D. Gershoff & Ashesh Mukherjee & Anirban Mukhopadhyay, 2007. "Few Ways to Love, but Many Ways to Hate: Attribute Ambiguity and the Positivity Effect in Agent Evaluation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 33(4), pages 499-505, December.
    15. John Hulland & Hans Baumgartner & Keith Marion Smith, 2018. "Marketing survey research best practices: evidence and recommendations from a review of JAMS articles," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 92-108, January.
    16. Yashar Bashirzadeh & Robert Mai & Corinne Faure, 2022. "How rich is too rich? Visual design elements in digital marketing communications," Post-Print hal-03603041, HAL.
    17. Khim-Yong Goh & Cheng-Suang Heng & Zhijie Lin, 2013. "Social Media Brand Community and Consumer Behavior: Quantifying the Relative Impact of User- and Marketer-Generated Content," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 88-107, March.
    18. Krishnamurthy, Parthasarathy & Sujan, Mita, 1999. "Retrospection versus Anticipation: The Role of the Ad under Retrospective and Anticipatory Self-Referencing," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 26(1), pages 55-69, June.
    19. Zoey Chen & Jonah Berger, 2013. "When, Why, and How Controversy Causes Conversation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(3), pages 580-593.
    20. Dhruv Grewal & Stephanie M. Noble & Anne L. Roggeveen & Jens Nordfalt, 2020. "The future of in-store technology," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 96-113, January.
    21. Brown, Jacqueline Johnson & Reingen, Peter H, 1987. "Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 14(3), pages 350-362, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davide Christian Orazi & Bhoomija Ranjan & Yimin Cheng, 2023. "Non-face emojis in digital marketing: Effects, contingencies, and strategic recommendations," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 570-597, May.
    2. Hu, Miao & Chen, Jie & Chen, Qimei & He, Wei, 2020. "It pays off to be authentic: An examination of direct versus indirect brand mentions on social media," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 19-28.
    3. He, Yi & You, Ya & Chen, Qimei, 2020. "Our conditional love for the underdog: The effect of brand positioning and the lay theory of achievement on WOM," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 210-222.
    4. Ana Babić Rosario & Kristine Valck & Francesca Sotgiu, 2020. "Conceptualizing the electronic word-of-mouth process: What we know and need to know about eWOM creation, exposure, and evaluation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 422-448, May.
    5. Volodymyr Nesterenko & Radoslaw Miskiewicz & Rafis Abazov, 2023. "Marketing Communications in the Era of Digital Transformation," Virtual Economics, The London Academy of Science and Business, vol. 6(1), pages 57-70, March.
    6. Bashirzadeh, Yashar & Mai, Robert & Faure, Corinne, 2022. "How rich is too rich? Visual design elements in digital marketing communications," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 58-76.
    7. Wang, Le & Luo, Xin (Robert) & Li, Han, 2022. "Envy or conformity? An empirical investigation of peer influence on the purchase of non-functional items in mobile free-to-play games," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 308-324.
    8. G. Rejikumar & Aswathy Asokan-Ajitha & Sofi Dinesh & Ajay Jose, 2022. "The role of cognitive complexity and risk aversion in online herd behavior," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 585-621, June.
    9. Ruth N. Bolton & Anders Gustafsson & Crina O. Tarasi & Lars Witell, 2022. "Designing satisfying service encounters: website versus store touchpoints," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 85-107, January.
    10. Bitterly, T. Bradford & Schweitzer, Maurice E., 2019. "The impression management benefits of humorous self-disclosures: How humor influences perceptions of veracity," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 73-89.
    11. Justin M. Lawrence & Andrew T. Crecelius & Lisa K. Scheer & Son K. Lam, 2019. "When it pays to have a friend on the inside: contingent effects of buyer advocacy on B2B suppliers," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 837-857, September.
    12. Azer, Jaylan & Ranaweera, Chatura, 2022. "Former customers’ E-WOM in social media platforms: An investigation of motives, network size and social ties," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 118-133.
    13. Krishen, Anjala S. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Bindu, N. & Kumar, K. Satheesh, 2021. "A broad overview of interactive digital marketing: A bibliometric network analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 183-195.
    14. Koji Ishida & Lisa Slevitch & Katia Siamionava, 2016. "The Effects of Traditional and Electronic Word-of-Mouth on Destination Image: A Case of Vacation Tourists Visiting Branson, Missouri," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-17, September.
    15. Abhishek Borah & Francesca Bonetti & Angelito Calma & José Martí-Parreño, 2023. "The Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science at 50: A historical analysis," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 222-243, January.
    16. John Hulland, 2020. "Conceptual review papers: revisiting existing research to develop and refine theory," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(1), pages 27-35, June.
    17. Khare, Adwait & Labrecque, Lauren I. & Asare, Anthony K., 2011. "The Assimilative and Contrastive Effects of Word-of-Mouth Volume: An Experimental Examination of Online Consumer Ratings," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 111-126.
    18. Ravula, Prashanth & Bhatnagar, Amit & Gauri, Dinesh K, 2023. "Role of gender in the creation and persuasiveness of online reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    19. Sara Kim & Rocky Peng Chen & Ke Zhang, 2016. "Anthropomorphized Helpers Undermine Autonomy and Enjoyment in Computer Games," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(2), pages 282-302.
    20. Coker, Brent L.S., 2012. "Seeking the opinions of others online: Evidence of evaluation overshoot," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 1033-1042.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joamsc:v:52:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11747-023-00932-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.