Author
Listed:
- Elpida Samara
(University of Western Macedonia)
- Pavlos Kilintzis
(University of Western Macedonia)
- Alexandra Grammenou
(Zurich University of Applied Sciences)
- Despoina Kanteler
(University of Western Macedonia)
- Snezhina Gabova
(Sofia Development Association)
- Zoya Damianova
(Applied Research and Communications Fund)
- Marko Hajdinjak
(Applied Research and Communications Fund)
Abstract
Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) has emerged the last decade as a prime science policy framework. The integration of RRI as a guiding framework in territorial governance has been a challenging issue for both researchers and policymakers, one that has not been sufficiently investigated, especially in the context of Transformative Innovation Policy (TIP). Whilst RRI has been mainly associated with a variety of societal actors at macro- and micro-level, there is a noticeable gap in the meso-level analysis, or at the level of territorial community systems. The objective of this article is to contribute to the emerging tendencies of fostering empirical, qualitative approaches of assessing and increasing the level of RRI embedment into territorial governance. To address this issue, RRI audits were conducted in four European territories with distinct policy foci. The audits were conducted in accordance with a three-step procedure, which commenced with a mapping of stakeholders’ interest in relation to RRI dimensions. They also sought to determine whether and how the RRI dimensions were integrated in the policy discourse. This enabled the identification of gaps in existing territorial policies and potential for integrating RRI into territorial governance to support the development of a TIP. The research findings highlighted a set of strategic policy priorities that may accelerate the implementation of a novel RRI-based governance paradigm.
Suggested Citation
Elpida Samara & Pavlos Kilintzis & Alexandra Grammenou & Despoina Kanteler & Snezhina Gabova & Zoya Damianova & Marko Hajdinjak, 2025.
"Towards Transformative Innovation Policy in Territorial Governance: Mapping the Relevance of RRI Elements,"
Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(3), pages 11214-11242, September.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:16:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s13132-024-02320-1
DOI: 10.1007/s13132-024-02320-1
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:16:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s13132-024-02320-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.