IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jknowl/v16y2025i2d10.1007_s13132-024-02017-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategies for Public Law Enforcement in Securities Class Action Amid the Knowledge Economy Revolution

Author

Listed:
  • Liyuan Wang

    (Central University of Finance and Economics)

Abstract

This study explores the dynamics between public and private enforcement mechanisms within China’s evolving securities regulatory landscape. Focusing on the landmark Kangmei Pharmaceutical case, which marked the inaugural class action lawsuit under China’s innovative Securities Class Action system, the study delves into the strengths and limitations inherent in China’s predominantly public-oriented approach. The research highlights the importance of balancing public and private enforcement, considering the strengths and weaknesses of each. It proposes a public–private coordination model that leverages public enforcement resources to guide and regulate private enforcement within a regulated framework. A market-oriented competition mechanism is suggested to facilitate collaboration and competition between the public and private sectors within Securities Class Action. Theoretical implications of this research challenge the binary perspective of securities law enforcement by advocating for a more dynamic and context-specific conceptualization. It encourages scholars to explore the intricacies of hybrid enforcement models and adapt enforcement strategies to the unique characteristics of the securities market. Managerial implications extend to legal practitioners, regulatory bodies, and corporate entities. Legal practitioners are urged to adopt an integrative approach that maximizes the strengths of both public and private systems. Regulatory bodies can benefit from streamlining enforcement procedures while maintaining a balanced approach, fostering a responsive and resilient regulatory environment. Corporate entities are advised to navigate securities litigation scenarios with a nuanced understanding of public–private collaboration to protect their interests effectively. This research contributes to the ongoing discourse on the optimal design of Securities Class Action systems, providing valuable insights for policymakers, legal practitioners, and stakeholders in China’s securities market. It underscores the importance of adaptability and collaboration in the ever-evolving landscape of global securities markets, promoting adequate investor protection and deterrence of securities violations.

Suggested Citation

  • Liyuan Wang, 2025. "Strategies for Public Law Enforcement in Securities Class Action Amid the Knowledge Economy Revolution," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(2), pages 6984-7015, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:16:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s13132-024-02017-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s13132-024-02017-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13132-024-02017-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13132-024-02017-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:16:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s13132-024-02017-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.