IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jknowl/v15y2024i4d10.1007_s13132-024-02133-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategizing Intellectual Property Rights for Enhanced Innovation: the Moderating Effects of R&D and FDI in China’s Regional Context

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaomeng Chi

    (School of Management, Jiangsu University
    Engineering Management, Jiangsu University Cranfield Tech Futures Graduate Institute)

  • Mingxing Li

    (School of Management, Jiangsu University
    Research Center for Green Development and Environmental Governance, Jiangsu University)

  • Hongzheng Sun

    (School of Management, Jiangsu University)

  • Saifullah

    (School of Management, Jiangsu University)

  • Mengjuan Zhang

    (School of Management, Jiangsu University
    Centre for Competitive Creation Design, Cranfield University)

  • Fredrick Oteng Agyeman

    (School of Management, Jiangsu University)

Abstract

This study investigates the strategic role of intellectual property rights (IPR) in driving technological innovation in China, focusing on the impact of research and development (R&D) and foreign direct investment (FDI) in different regional contexts. Given the critical importance of understanding how enhanced IPR protection can stimulate technological progress in emerging economies like China, this research addresses theoretical and practical gaps by proposing a region-specific approach to IPR strategy, considering the unique dynamics of R&D and FDI. Analyzing data from 21 Chinese provinces, cities, and autonomous regions from 2007 to 2019 using a fixed-effects model, the findings highlight that stronger IPR protection significantly boosts domestic technological innovation by motivating R&D efforts, which in turn increases the rate of invention patent applications. However, the study uncovers a complex interaction where increased IPR stringency might deter FDI flows, negatively impacting the IPR-innovation relationship. Furthermore, the interplay between FDI and R&D can hinder innovation outcomes, with the Western region of China being particularly affected by FDI's influence on innovation, in contrast to the Eastern and Central regions. These insights emphasize the necessity of aligning IPR protection with R&D and FDI policies to create an innovation ecosystem conducive to sustained technological development. This research contributes to the existing literature by offering empirical evidence on the optimal configuration of IPR, R&D, and FDI strategies for fostering innovation, providing valuable insights for policymakers and stakeholders in the knowledge economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaomeng Chi & Mingxing Li & Hongzheng Sun & Saifullah & Mengjuan Zhang & Fredrick Oteng Agyeman, 2024. "Strategizing Intellectual Property Rights for Enhanced Innovation: the Moderating Effects of R&D and FDI in China’s Regional Context," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 19887-19909, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:15:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s13132-024-02133-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s13132-024-02133-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13132-024-02133-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13132-024-02133-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Feng, Wei & Li, Jiajia, 2021. "International technology spillovers and innovation quality: Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 289-308.
    2. Hudson, John & Minea, Alexandru, 2013. "Innovation, Intellectual Property Rights, and Economic Development: A Unified Empirical Investigation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 66-78.
    3. Santoro, Gabriele & Bresciani, Stefano & Papa, Armando, 2020. "Collaborative modes with Cultural and Creative Industries and innovation performance: The moderating role of heterogeneous sources of knowledge and absorptive capacity," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 92.
    4. Muhammad Tariq Majeed & Eatzaz Ahmad, 2007. "FDI and Exports in Developing Countries: Theory and Evidence," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 46(4), pages 735-750.
    5. Chu, Angus C. & Fan, Haichao & Shen, Guobing & Zhang, Xun, 2018. "Effects of international trade and intellectual property rights on innovation in China," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 110-121.
    6. Campi, Mercedes & Dueñas, Marco, 2019. "Intellectual property rights, trade agreements, and international trade," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 531-545.
    7. Liu, Shiyuan & Du, Jiang & Zhang, Weike & Tian, Xiaoli & Kou, Gang, 2021. "Innovation quantity or quality? The role of political connections," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    8. Enkel, Ellen & Sagmeister, Veronika, 2020. "External corporate venturing modes as new way to develop dynamic capabilities," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 96.
    9. Mothe, Caroline & Nguyen-Thi, Thuc Uyen, 2021. "Does age diversity boost technological innovation? Exploring the moderating role of HR practices," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 829-843.
    10. Ya-Fang Wang & Yen-Ju Chen, 2017. "The Causes and Economic Consequences of Patent Litigation," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 7(11), pages 1123-1143, November.
    11. Sáiz, Patricio & Castro, Rafael, 2017. "Foreign Direct Investment and Intellectual Property Rights: International Intangible Assets in Spain over the Long Term," Enterprise & Society, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(4), pages 846-892, December.
    12. Klein, Michael A., 2018. "Foreign direct investment and collective intellectual property protection in developing countries," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 389-412.
    13. Caroline Mothe & Thuc Uyen Nguyen-Thi, 2021. "Does age diversity boost technological innovation? Exploring the moderating role of HR practices," Post-Print hal-03969462, HAL.
    14. Tou, Yuji & Watanabe, Chihiro & Neittaanmäki, Pekka, 2020. "Fusion of technology management and financing management - Amazon's transformative endeavor by orchestrating techno-financing systems," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    15. James A Brander & Victor Cui & Ilan Vertinsky, 2017. "China and intellectual property rights: A challenge to the rule of law," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 48(7), pages 908-921, September.
    16. Landoni, Paolo & Dell’era, Claudio & Frattini, Federico & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio & Verganti, Roberto & Manelli, Luca, 2020. "Business model innovation in cultural and creative industries: Insights from three leading mobile gaming firms," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 92.
    17. Wang, Cassandra C. & Wu, Aiqi, 2016. "Geographical FDI knowledge spillover and innovation of indigenous firms in China," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 895-906.
    18. Chen, Yongmin & Jiang, Haiwei & Liang, Yousha & Pan, Shiyuan, 2022. "The impact of foreign direct investment on innovation: Evidence from patent filings and citations in China," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(4), pages 917-945.
    19. Ding, Lei & Xue, Peng, 2023. "Incentives or disincentives? Intellectual property protection and FinTech innovation - Evidence from Chinese cities," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PB).
    20. Lee, Minsoo & Alba, Joseph D. & Park, Donghyun, 2018. "Intellectual property rights, informal economy, and FDI into developing countries," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 1067-1081.
    21. Ya-Fang Wang & Yen-Ju Chen, 2017. "The Causes and Economic Consequences of Patent Litigation," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 7(11), pages 1123-1143.
    22. Anwar Naseem & David J. Spielman & Steven Were Omamo, 2010. "Private-sector investment in R&D: a review of policy options to promote its growth in developing-country agriculture," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 143-173.
    23. Levin, Richard C & Cohen, Wesley M & Mowery, David C, 1985. "R&D Appropriability, Opportunity, and Market Structure: New Evidence on Some Schumpeterian Hypotheses," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(2), pages 20-24, May.
    24. Gmeiner, Robert & Gmeiner, Michael, 2021. "Encouraging domestic innovation by protecting foreign intellectual property," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    25. Dan Huang & Shihu Zhong & Juan Tang & Jingjing Zhao, 2021. "Impact of foreign direct investment on the haze pollution in various cities: Evidence from China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 2016-2039, December.
    26. Salvador Barrios & Eric Strobl, 2002. "Foreign direct investment and productivity spillovers: Evidence from the Spanish experience," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 138(3), pages 459-481, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pengfei Cheng & Yuhao Wang & Mengzhen Wang, 2024. "Does intellectual property rights protection help reduce carbon emissions?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Viglioni, Marco Túlio Dinali & Calegario, Cristina Lelis Leal & Aveline, Carlos Eduardo Stefaniak & Ferreira, Manuel Portugal & Borini, Felipe Mendes & Bruhn, Nádia Campos Pereira, 2023. "Effects of intellectual property rights on innovation and economic activity: A non-linear perspective from Latin America," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 359-371.
    3. Su, Zhongfeng & Wang, Chenfeng & Peng, Mike W., 2022. "Intellectual property rights protection and total factor productivity," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(3).
    4. Claudia Canals & Michael A. Klein & Fuat Şener, 2023. "Intellectual property‐related preferential trade agreements and US offshoring to developing countries," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1442-1475, September.
    5. Homero Rodríguez-Insuasti & Néstor Montalván-Burbano & Otto Suárez-Rodríguez & Marcela Yonfá-Medranda & Katherine Parrales-Guerrero, 2022. "Creative Economy: A Worldwide Research in Business, Management and Accounting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-27, November.
    6. Yipeng Zhang, 2023. "The Sustainability of Regional Innovation in China: Insights from Regional Innovation Values and Their Spatial Distribution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-42, June.
    7. Rammal, Hussain G. & Rose, Elizabeth L. & Ferreira, João J., 2023. "Managing cross-border knowledge transfer for innovation: An introduction to the special issue," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(2).
    8. Ha Thi-Thu Le & Trang Thi-Dai Luong & Trang Thi Thu Nguyen & Duy Van Nguyen, 2023. "Determinants of Intellectual Property Rights Protection in Asian Developing Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(4), pages 4780-4806, December.
    9. Sharma, Abhijit & Sousa, Cristina & Woodward, Richard, 2022. "Determinants of innovation outcomes: The role of institutional quality," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    10. Khlystova, Olena & Kalyuzhnova, Yelena & Belitski, Maksim, 2022. "The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the creative industries: A literature review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1192-1210.
    11. Jun Yeung Hong & Sung Min Jeon & Gun Lee, 2023. "Younger CEO and older managers: focusing on tournament incentives," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 549-573, December.
    12. Mhamed-Ali El-Aroui & Selma Dellagi & Fouad Ben Abdelaziz, 2021. "The Dilemma of Intellectual Property Agreements and R&D in Developing Economies: A Game Theory Approach," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 19(3), pages 427-450, September.
    13. Ilmakunnas, Pekka, 2025. "Employee age structure and firm innovation," MPRA Paper 123630, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Feng, Wei & Li, Jiajia, 2021. "International technology spillovers and innovation quality: Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 289-308.
    15. Hu, Xiaotian & Yin, Xiaopeng, 2022. "Do stronger intellectual property rights protections raise productivity within the context of trade liberalization? Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    16. Gnangnon, Sèna Kimm, 2023. "The Least developed countries' TRIPS Waiver and the Strength of Intellectual Property Protection," EconStor Preprints 271537, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    17. Shaomin Li & Ilan Alon, 2020. "China’s intellectual property rights provocation: A political economy view," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(1), pages 60-72, March.
    18. Mengzhen Wang & Baekryul Choi, 2023. "An Analysis of the Impact of International R&D Spillovers and Technology Innovation in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-25, January.
    19. Spielman, David J. & Ma, Xingliang, 2014. "Intellectual property rights, technology diffusion, and agricultural development: Cross-country evidence," IFPRI discussion papers 1345, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    20. Willoughby, Kelvin W. & Mullina, Nadezhda, 2021. "Reverse innovation, international patenting and economic inertia: Constraints to appropriating the benefits of technological innovation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:15:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s13132-024-02133-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.