IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/irpnmk/v20y2023i3d10.1007_s12208-023-00369-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An approach for analysing and segmenting messages about the SDGs on Twitter from the perspective of social marketing

Author

Listed:
  • Araceli Galiano-Coronil

    (University of Cadiz)

  • Manuela Ortega-Gil

    (University of Cadiz)

  • Belén Macías-Varela

    (University of Cadiz)

  • Rafael Ravina-Ripoll

    (University of Cadiz)

Abstract

This descriptive study aims to identify the most published SDGs by @GlobalGoalsUN, the United Nations’ official account for sustainable development goals, and elaborate the segmentation profiles of these messages that promote a more significant impact from the perspective of social marketing and happiness. With more than 345 million active users in 2022, Twitter is a relevant social media tool for researching and knowing public reactions. In order to identify the most relevant SDGs, we have downloaded tweets from January 1, 2021, to September 30, 2022. The segmentation profiles have been elaborated with the classification tree using the division method called CHAID (Chi-square automatic interaction detector), which allows the automatic detection of interactions through Chi-square. This technique has made it possible to identify four homogeneous sub-samples corresponding to the segmentation profiles of messages based on impact, social marketing and happiness. The results of these profiles show the categories of the variables that best distinguish the messages. In addition, it has been verified that the most published SDGs do not coincide with those that have achieved the greatest impact. The climate has been the most published SDG (SDG 13 Climate action), but the one that has obtained the most significant reaction from the public has been the SDG related to well-being (SDG 3 Health and well-being). The most popular format has been video, the most recurrent emotional tone has been neutral, and, about social marketing, a category of action messages stands out, unlike behavioural ones, which do not specify the indications to carry out a specific initiative.

Suggested Citation

  • Araceli Galiano-Coronil & Manuela Ortega-Gil & Belén Macías-Varela & Rafael Ravina-Ripoll, 2023. "An approach for analysing and segmenting messages about the SDGs on Twitter from the perspective of social marketing," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 20(3), pages 635-658, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:irpnmk:v:20:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s12208-023-00369-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s12208-023-00369-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12208-023-00369-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12208-023-00369-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lyn S. Amine & Karin M. Staub, 2009. "Women entrepreneurs in sub-Saharan Africa: An institutional theory analysis from a social marketing point of view," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 183-211, March.
    2. Yannick van Hierden & Sharyn Rundle-Thiele & Timo Dietrich, 2022. "Improving Well-Being in Young Adults: A Social Marketing Proof-of-Concept," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Ana Reyes-Menendez & José Ramón Saura & Cesar Alvarez-Alonso, 2018. "Understanding #WorldEnvironmentDay User Opinions in Twitter: A Topic-Based Sentiment Analysis Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, November.
    4. De Luca, Francesco & Iaia, Lea & Mehmood, Asad & Vrontis, Demetris, 2022. "Corrigendum to “Can social media improve stakeholder engagement and communication of Sustainable Development Goals? A cross-country analysis”," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    5. Graham M Turner, 2008. "A Comparison of the Limits to Growth with Thirty Years of Reality," Socio-Economics and the Environment in Discussion (SEED) Working Paper Series 2008-09, CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems.
    6. Irene Daskalopoulou & Athanasia Karakitsiou & Christina Malliou, 2022. "A Multicriteria Analysis of Life Satisfaction: Assessing Trust and Distance Effects," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Fukuda-Parr, Sakiko & Muchhala, Bhumika, 2020. "The Southern origins of sustainable development goals: Ideas, actors, aspirations," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    8. Felix Creutzig & Joyashree Roy & William F. Lamb & Inês M. L. Azevedo & Wändi Bruine de Bruin & Holger Dalkmann & Oreane Y. Edelenbosch & Frank W. Geels & Arnulf Grubler & Cameron Hepburn & Edgar G. H, 2018. "Towards demand-side solutions for mitigating climate change," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(4), pages 260-263, April.
    9. Chandan Kumar Roy & Huang Xiaoling, 2022. "Achieving SDG 5, gender equality and empower all women and girls, in developing countries: how aid for trade can help?," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 49(6), pages 930-959, March.
    10. Jacqueline D. Lau & Danika Kleiber & Sarah Lawless & Philippa J. Cohen, 2021. "Gender equality in climate policy and practice hindered by assumptions," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 11(3), pages 186-192, March.
    11. Pavlova, Alina & Berkers, Pauwke, 2020. "Mental health discourse and social media: Which mechanisms of cultural power drive discourse on Twitter," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    12. ., 2002. "Infrastructure Policy in Socialism and in the Market Economy," Chapters, in: Modernizing Infrastructure in Transformation Economies, chapter 2, pages 15-38, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. De Luca, Francesco & Iaia, Lea & Mehmood, Asad & Vrontis, Demetris, 2022. "Can social media improve stakeholder engagement and communication of Sustainable Development Goals? A cross-country analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    14. Robertson, Kirsten & Davidson, Jessica, 2013. "Gender-role stereotypes in integrated social marketing communication: Influence on attitudes towards the ad," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 168-175.
    15. Eastin, Joshua, 2018. "Climate change and gender equality in developing states," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 289-305.
    16. Mary Sanford & James Painter & Taha Yasseri & Jamie Lorimer, 2021. "Controversy around climate change reports: a case study of Twitter responses to the 2019 IPCC report on land," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 1-25, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arnold Pabian & Barbara Pabian, 2023. "Role of Social Media in Managing Knowledge of the Young Generation in the Sustainability Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Isaac Doku, 2024. "Rainfall Variabilty, Climate Finance and Gender Inequality: A Zoom in on Sub-saharan Africa Women," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 14(5), pages 210-219, September.
    3. Barbaglia, Martina & Bianchini, Roberto & Butticè, Vincenzo & Elia, Stefano & Mariani, Marcello M., 2023. "The role of environmental sustainability in the relocation choices of MNEs: Back to the home country or welcome in a new host country?," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(5).
    4. Czakon, Wojciech & Mania, Karolina & Jedynak, Monika & Kuźniarska, Aneta & Choiński, Michał & Dabić, Marina, 2024. "Who are we? Analyzing the digital identities of organizations through the lens of micro-interactions on social media," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    5. Akrum Helfaya & Phuong Bui, 2022. "Exploring the Status Quo of Adopting the 17 UN SDGs in a Developing Country—Evidence from Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-29, November.
    6. Paweł Bryła & Shuvam Chatterjee & Beata Ciabiada-Bryła, 2022. "The Impact of Social Media Marketing on Consumer Engagement in Sustainable Consumption: A Systematic Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Kraus, Sascha & Kumar, Satish & Lim, Weng Marc & Kaur, Jaspreet & Sharma, Anuj & Schiavone, Francesco, 2023. "From moon landing to metaverse: Tracing the evolution of Technological Forecasting and Social Change," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    8. Balint, T. & Lamperti, F. & Mandel, A. & Napoletano, M. & Roventini, A. & Sapio, A., 2017. "Complexity and the Economics of Climate Change: A Survey and a Look Forward," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 252-265.
    9. Nicolas Bouleau, 2012. "Limits To Growth And Stochastics," Post-Print halshs-00782948, HAL.
    10. Bailly, Hugo & Mortier, Frédéric & Giraud, Gaël, 2024. "Empirical analysis of a debt-augmented Goodwin model for the United States," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 619-633.
    11. repec:voc:wpaper:tech82012 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Yuru Guan & Jin Yan & Yuli Shan & Yannan Zhou & Ye Hang & Ruoqi Li & Yu Liu & Binyuan Liu & Qingyun Nie & Benedikt Bruckner & Kuishuang Feng & Klaus Hubacek, 2023. "Burden of the global energy price crisis on households," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 8(3), pages 304-316, March.
    13. Malmaeus, J. Mikael & Alfredsson, Eva C., 2017. "Potential Consequences on the Economy of Low or No Growth - Short and Long Term Perspectives," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 57-64.
    14. Xhulia Likaj & Michael Jacobs & Thomas Fricke, 2022. "Growth, Degrowth or Post-growth? Towards a synthetic understanding of the growth debate," Basic Papers 2, Forum New Economy.
    15. Castro, Damaris & Bleys, Brent, 2023. "Do people think they have enough? A subjective income sufficiency assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    16. Alice Tianbo Zhang & Sasmita Patnaik & Shaily Jha & Shalu Agrawal & Carlos F. Gould & Johannes Urpelainen, 2022. "Evidence of multidimensional gender inequality in energy services from a large-scale household survey in India," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 7(8), pages 698-707, August.
    17. Lei, Mingyu & Cai, Wenjia & Liu, Wenling & Wang, Can, 2022. "The heterogeneity in energy consumption patterns and home appliance purchasing preferences across urban households in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    18. Lavlu Mozumdar & Geoffrey Hagelaar & Valentina C. Materia & S. W. F. Omta & Mohammad Amirul Islam & Gerben Velde, 2019. "Embeddedness or Over-Embeddedness? Women Entrepreneurs’ Networks and Their Influence on Business Performance," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(5), pages 1449-1469, December.
    19. Lukáš Režný & Vladimír Bureš, 2019. "Energy Transition Scenarios and Their Economic Impacts in the Extended Neoclassical Model of Economic Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-25, July.
    20. Hänsel, Martin C. & Quaas, Martin F., 2018. "Intertemporal Distribution, Sufficiency, and the Social Cost of Carbon," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 520-535.
    21. Aydin Kayabasi & Ceren Karavelioglu & N. Derya Ergun Ozler, 2021. "The Effect of Institutional Environment, General SelfEfficacy and Desirability On Social Entrepreneurship Intentions in Turkey," Istanbul Business Research, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 50(2), pages 411-434, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:irpnmk:v:20:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s12208-023-00369-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.