IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/intemj/v21y2025i1d10.1007_s11365-025-01078-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business ecosystems as a way to activate lock-in in business models: a theoretical integration

Author

Listed:
  • Darek M. Haftor

    (Uppsala University
    University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw)

  • Ricardo Costa Climent

    (Uppsala University
    University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw)

  • Andreas Kallmuenzer

    (Excelia Business School)

Abstract

As technology-enabled innovations have become ever more common, successful firms have struggled to stay ahead of their imitators. One way for an innovating firm to defend itself from imitators is to activate lock-in mechanisms. These mechanisms discourage actors in the innovating firm’s business model from migrating to imitators. Current business model theory explains how to establish lock-in through loyalty, sunk costs, direct network effects, indirect network effects, and data network effects. This paper extends the current understanding of lock-in by integrating business ecosystem theory with business model theory. The objective is to outline how firms can strategically configure their business ecosystems to activate lock-in mechanisms that discourage actors (e.g., customers, suppliers, and partners) from migrating to competitors. When an innovating firm’s business model is deliberately configured to activate lock-in by establishing a business ecosystem, it can withstand imitation. Real-life examples are provided to illustrate this mechanism in action. The paper also provides managerial recommendations for how to activate lock-in by establishing a business ecosystem. Finally, it highlights topics that deserve further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Darek M. Haftor & Ricardo Costa Climent & Andreas Kallmuenzer, 2025. "Business ecosystems as a way to activate lock-in in business models: a theoretical integration," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-22, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:intemj:v:21:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11365-025-01078-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11365-025-01078-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11365-025-01078-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11365-025-01078-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan Wareham & Paul B. Fox & Josep Lluís Cano Giner, 2014. "Technology Ecosystem Governance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 1195-1215, August.
    2. Sendil K. Ethiraj & David H. Zhu, 2008. "Performance effects of imitative entry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 797-817, August.
    3. Olivier Blanchard & Francesco Giavazzi, 2003. "Macroeconomic Effects of Regulation and Deregulation in Goods and Labor Markets," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 118(3), pages 879-907.
    4. Williamson, Oliver E, 1979. "Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractural Relations," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 22(2), pages 233-261, October.
    5. Schmalensee, Richard, 1992. "Sunk Costs and Market Structure: A Review Article," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 125-134, June.
    6. Nicholas Economides, 1997. "The Economics of Networks," Brazilian Electronic Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, vol. 1(0), December.
    7. Hart E. Posen & Dirk Martignoni, 2018. "Revisiting the imitation assumption: Why imitation may increase, rather than decrease, performance heterogeneity," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(5), pages 1350-1369, May.
    8. Ricciardi, Francesca & Zardini, Alessandro & Rossignoli, Cecilia, 2016. "Organizational dynamism and adaptive business model innovation: The triple paradox configuration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5487-5493.
    9. Christoph Zott & Raphael Amit, 2008. "The fit between product market strategy and business model: implications for firm performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 1-26, January.
    10. Gabriel Hawawini & Venkat Subramanian & Paul Verdin, 2003. "Is performance driven by industry‐or firm‐specific factors? A new look at the evidence," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(1), pages 1-16, January.
    11. David J. Teece, 2007. "Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(13), pages 1319-1350, December.
    12. Raphael Amit & Christoph Zott, 2001. "Value creation in E‐business," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(6‐7), pages 493-520, June.
    13. Michele Piazzai & Nachoem M. Wijnberg, 2019. "Product proliferation, complexity, and deterrence to imitation in differentiated‐product oligopolies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 945-958, June.
    14. Clements, Matthew T., 2004. "Direct and indirect network effects: are they equivalent?," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 633-645, May.
    15. Kulins, Christopher & Leonardy, Hannes & Weber, Christiana, 2016. "A configurational approach in business model design," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 1437-1441.
    16. David B. Audretsch & Hector Rocha & Sourabh Aggarwal & Agustin Bramanti, 2024. "Do entrepreneurial ecosystems foster sustainable development?," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-37, March.
    17. Ron Adner & Rahul Kapoor, 2010. "Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 306-333, March.
    18. Tomi Laamanen & Juha-Antti Lamberg & Eero Vaara, 2016. "Explanations of success and failure in management learning : What can we learn from Nokia's rise and fall," Post-Print hal-02276713, HAL.
    19. Anita M. McGahan & Michael E. Porter, 2002. "What Do We Know About Variance in Accounting Profitability?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(7), pages 834-851, July.
    20. Tomi Laamanen & Juha-Antti Lamberg & Eero Vaara, 2016. "Explanations of success and failure in management learning : What can we learn from Nokia's rise and fall," Post-Print hal-02313295, HAL.
    21. Milgrom, Paul & Roberts, John, 1995. "Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(2-3), pages 179-208, April.
    22. Ozturk, Ayse, 2016. "Examining the economic growth and the middle-income trap from the perspective of the middle class," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 726-738.
    23. Gerard George & Adam J. Bock, 2011. "The Business Model in Practice and its Implications for Entrepreneurship Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(1), pages 83-111, January.
    24. Katz, Michael L & Shapiro, Carl, 1985. "Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(3), pages 424-440, June.
    25. Costa Climent, Ricardo & Haftor, Darek M., 2021. "Value creation through the evolution of business model themes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 353-361.
    26. Haftor, Darek. M. & Climent Costa, Ricardo, 2023. "Five dimensions of business model innovation: A multi-case exploration of industrial incumbent firm’s business model transformations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    27. Christoph Zott & Raphael Amit, 2007. "Business Model Design and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 181-199, April.
    28. Richard P. Rumelt, 1991. "How much does industry matter?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 167-185, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Costa Climent, Ricardo & Haftor, Darek M., 2021. "Business model theory-based prediction of digital technology use: An empirical assessment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    2. Costa Climent, Ricardo & Haftor, Darek M., 2021. "Value creation through the evolution of business model themes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 353-361.
    3. Haftor, Darek M. & Costa Climent, Ricardo & Lundström, Jenny Eriksson, 2021. "How machine learning activates data network effects in business models: Theory advancement through an industrial case of promoting ecological sustainability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 196-205.
    4. Haftor, Darek. M. & Climent Costa, Ricardo, 2023. "Five dimensions of business model innovation: A multi-case exploration of industrial incumbent firm’s business model transformations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    5. Seok-Soo KIM, 2021. "Sustainable Growth Variables by Industry Sectors and Their Influence on Changes in Business Models of SMEs in the Era of Digital Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-21, June.
    6. Yan Jingwen & Azmawani Abd Rahman & Tong Tong, 2022. "Research on the Impact of BMI on Enterprise Performance Based on the Antecedence of Risk Perception," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, November.
    7. Randhawa, Krithika & Wilden, Ralf & Gudergan, Siegfried, 2021. "How to innovate toward an ambidextrous business model? The role of dynamic capabilities and market orientation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 618-634.
    8. Shi, Xianwei & Liang, Xingkun & Luo, Yining, 2023. "Unpacking the intellectual structure of ecosystem research in innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    9. Zhang, Hongfang & Xiao, Huilin & Wang, Yanling & Shareef, Mahmud A. & Akram, Muhammad Shakaib & Goraya, M. Awais Shakir, 2021. "An integration of antecedents and outcomes of business model innovation: A meta-analytic review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 803-814.
    10. Diego Campagnolo & Martina Gianecchini & Luigi Mosca, 2024. "Configurations of business model themes and strategies in small firms: a qualitative comparative analysis," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(3), pages 1-29, September.
    11. Belussi, Fiorenza & Orsi, Luigi & Savarese, Maria, 2019. "Mapping Business Model Research: A Document Bibliometric Analysis," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(3).
    12. Arun Rai & Xinlin Tang, 2014. "Research Commentary ---Information Technology-Enabled Business Models: A Conceptual Framework and a Coevolution Perspective for Future Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 1-14, March.
    13. Sarel Gronum & John Steen & Martie-Louise Verreynne, 2016. "Business model design and innovation: Unlocking the performance benefits of innovation," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 41(3), pages 585-605, August.
    14. Yuan, Chun & Xue, Doudou & He, Xin, 2021. "A balancing strategy for ambidextrous learning, dynamic capabilities, and business model design, the opposite moderating effects of environmental dynamism," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    15. Balboni, Bernardo & Bortoluzzi, Guido & Pugliese, Roberto & Tracogna, Andrea, 2019. "Business model evolution, contextual ambidexterity and the growth performance of high-tech start-ups," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 115-124.
    16. Jonathan H. Reed, 2022. "Operational and strategic change during temporary turbulence: evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 589-608, June.
    17. Baoliang Hu & Wei Huang & Shuai Yan & Guang Liu & Tao Zhang, 2020. "Business Model Design and Customer Loyalty: The Mediating Role of Customer Citizenship Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-14, August.
    18. Amandine Maus & Sylvie Sammut, 2018. "Business model innovation in incubators: the role played by dynamic capabilities theory," Post-Print hal-02466175, HAL.
    19. Meena Madhavan & Mohammed Ali Sharafuddin & Thanapong Chaichana, 2022. "Impact of Business Model Innovation on Sustainable Performance of Processed Marine Food Product SMEs in Thailand—A PLS-SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-33, August.
    20. Hou, Hong & Shi, Yongjiang, 2021. "Ecosystem-as-structure and ecosystem-as-coevolution: A constructive examination," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:intemj:v:21:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11365-025-01078-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.