Author
Listed:
- Lauren A. Rhodes
(Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanísticas, Centro de Vinculación e Investigaciones Rurales, Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral, ESPOL)
- Gonzalo E. Sánchez
(Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanísticas, Centro de Investigaciones Económicas, Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral, ESPOL)
- Nereyda Espinoza-Velasteguí
(Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanísticas, Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral, ESPOL
Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de Sevilla)
- Viviana Borja
(Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanísticas, Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral, ESPOL)
Abstract
Sexual harassment in and out of the workplace has social and economic implications for both the harassed and those subject to the environment. Understanding the nature of sexual harassment perceptions is an important step in designing effective policies aimed at its elimination. This study estimates the gaps between individual and social perceptions of sexual harassment and examines the role of gender in perception gaps in this context. This is accomplished through a laboratory experiment in order to use an incentivized method to elicit the social norm perceptions for sexual harassment scenarios of different types that could be considered in the “gray area”. We find that a gap between individual and social perceptions occurs when accounting for gender but is not present when gender is not accounted for. This occurs because we find that men and women tend to have opposite perception gaps. Under the assumption that perceived social norms influence behavior, our findings suggest that it could be beneficial to design campaigns that consider the role of gender on perceptions of sexual harassment.
Suggested Citation
Lauren A. Rhodes & Gonzalo E. Sánchez & Nereyda Espinoza-Velasteguí & Viviana Borja, 2025.
"Assessing the gap between social and individual perceptions of sexual harassment,"
International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 72(2), pages 1-19, December.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:inrvec:v:72:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s12232-025-00503-z
DOI: 10.1007/s12232-025-00503-z
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:inrvec:v:72:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s12232-025-00503-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.