IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infott/v25y2023i4d10.1007_s40558-023-00263-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The determinants of the adoption of blockchain technology in the tourism sector and metaverse perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Aurélie Corne

    (University of Perpignan, CRESEM (UR 7397))

  • Véronique Massot

    (University of Perpignan, MRM (UR 4557))

  • Saida Merasli

    (University of Perpignan, CRESEM (UR 7397))

Abstract

The purpose of this contribution is to provide some answers to the following issue: how to explain the intention to adopt blockchain technology in the tourist accommodation sector? This study focusses on the applications of this technology for the following uses: loyalty programs, online booking, reliability and traceability of customer testimonials on review sites. Blockchain also helps to secure metaverse data, an innovative and immersive technology in a virtual universe, which is gaining ground in the tourism sector. This paper mobilizes the Technology Acceptance Model theory to explain the adoption of new technologies. This model is based on three closely related concepts: perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use influence the attitude toward using the technology. By following the literature, trust in technology and promotional efforts of change agents, two other determinants that can have a positive impact on the adoption of blockchain applications, have also been introduced to extend the theory. A quantitative survey is conducted to obtain the data. Thus, a questionnaire is administered to a hundred respondents, graduated in tourism management and future professionals in this sector of activity. The fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis is implemented to consider the complexity of the phenomenon studied by identifying paths composed of several conditions. The objective is to explain the intention to use blockchain applications by future managers of tourist accommodation.

Suggested Citation

  • Aurélie Corne & Véronique Massot & Saida Merasli, 2023. "The determinants of the adoption of blockchain technology in the tourism sector and metaverse perspectives," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 605-633, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infott:v:25:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s40558-023-00263-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s40558-023-00263-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40558-023-00263-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40558-023-00263-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marianna Sigala, 2017. "Collaborative commerce in tourism: implications for research and industry," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 346-355, March.
    2. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    3. Gary C. Moore & Izak Benbasat, 1991. "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 192-222, September.
    4. Woodside, Arch G., 2014. "Embrace•perform•model: Complexity theory, contrarian case analysis, and multiple realities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(12), pages 2495-2503.
    5. De Filippi, Primavera & Mannan, Morshed & Reijers, Wessel, 2020. "Blockchain as a confidence machine: The problem of trust & challenges of governance," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    6. Guych Nuryyev & Yu-Ping Wang & Jennet Achyldurdyyeva & Bih-Shiaw Jaw & Yi-Shien Yeh & Hsien-Tang Lin & Li-Fan Wu, 2020. "Blockchain Technology Adoption Behavior and Sustainability of the Business in Tourism and Hospitality SMEs: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, February.
    7. Kieran Mathieson, 1991. "Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 173-191, September.
    8. Bumblauskas, Daniel & Mann, Arti & Dugan, Brett & Rittmer, Jacy, 2020. "A blockchain use case in food distribution: Do you know where your food has been?," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    9. Emmanuel Fragnière & Jean-Michel Sahut & Lubica Hikkerova & Roland Schegg & Michael Schumacher & Sandra Grèzes & Randolf Ramseyer, 2022. "Blockchain Technology in the Tourism Industry: New Perspectives in Switzerland," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 65-90.
    10. Frizzo-Barker, Julie & Chow-White, Peter A. & Adams, Philippa R. & Mentanko, Jennifer & Ha, Dung & Green, Sandy, 2020. "Blockchain as a disruptive technology for business: A systematic review," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    11. Corne, Aurélie & Peypoch, Nicolas, 2020. "On the determinants of tourism performance," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    12. Na Liu & Zuoliang Ye, 2021. "Empirical research on the blockchain adoption – based on TAM," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(37), pages 4263-4275, August.
    13. Önder, Irem & Treiblmaier, Horst, 2018. "Blockchain and tourism: Three research propositions," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 180-182.
    14. D. Harrison McKnight & Vivek Choudhury & Charles Kacmar, 2002. "Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 334-359, September.
    15. Ante, L. & Steinmetz, F. & Fiedler, I., 2021. "Blockchain and energy: A bibliometric analysis and review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    16. Donghee Shin & William T. Bianco, 2020. "In Blockchain We Trust: Does Blockchain Itself Generate Trust?," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(7), pages 2522-2538, December.
    17. Roberto Leonardo Rana & Nino Adamashvili & Caterina Tricase, 2022. "The Impact of Blockchain Technology Adoption on Tourism Industry: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    18. Valeri, Marco, 2015. "Networking and cooperation practices in the Italian tourism business," MPRA Paper 77465, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 28 Apr 2016.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaeki Song & Fatemeh Mariam Zahedi, 2005. "A Theoretical Approach to Web Design in E-Commerce: A Belief Reinforcement Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(8), pages 1219-1235, August.
    2. Tanković Ana Čuić & Prodan Marina Perišić & Benazić Dragan, 2023. "Consumer Segments in Blockchain Technology Adoption," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 18(2), pages 162-172, December.
    3. Sara Moussawi & Marios Koufaris & Raquel Benbunan-Fich, 2021. "How perceptions of intelligence and anthropomorphism affect adoption of personal intelligent agents," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(2), pages 343-364, June.
    4. Francisco Rejón-Guardia & Juán Sánchez-Fernández & Francisco Muñoz-Leiva, 2011. "Motivational Factors that influence the Acceptance of Microblogging Social Networks: The µBAM Model," FEG Working Paper Series 06/11, Faculty of Economics and Business (University of Granada).
    5. Keen, C. & Wetzels, M., 2001. "Exploring the Preference Structure for Online and Traditional Retail Formats," Working Papers 01.18, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies.
    6. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2006_032 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Funmilola Omotayo & Oluwatobi Dahunsi, 2015. "Factors Affecting Adoption of Point of Sale Terminals by Business Organisations in Nigeria," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(10), pages 115-137, October.
    8. Ritu Agarwal & V. Sambamurthy & Ralph M. Stair, 2000. "Research Report: The Evolving Relationship Between General and Specific Computer Self-Efficacy—An Empirical Assessment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 418-430, December.
    9. Viswanath Venkatesh, 2000. "Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 342-365, December.
    10. Igbaria, M. & Iivari, J., 1995. "The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 587-605, December.
    11. Gao, Tao (Tony) & Rohm, Andrew J. & Sultan, Fareena & Pagani, Margherita, 2013. "Consumers un-tethered: A three-market empirical study of consumers' mobile marketing acceptance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2536-2544.
    12. van Hoesel, C.P.M. & Goossens, J.H.M. & Kroon, L.G., 2001. "A branch-and-cut approach for solving line planning problems," Research Memorandum 016, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    13. Damon E. Campbell & John D. Wells & Joseph S. Valacich, 2013. "Breaking the Ice in B2C Relationships: Understanding Pre-Adoption E-Commerce Attraction," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 219-238, June.
    14. Seif Obeid Al-Shbiel & Muhannad Akram Ahmad, 2016. "A Theoretical Discussion of Electronic Banking in Jordan by Integrating Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 6(3), pages 272-284, July.
    15. Donglin Han & Huiying (Cynthia) Hou & Hao Wu & Joseph H. K. Lai, 2021. "Modelling Tourists’ Acceptance of Hotel Experience-Enhancement Smart Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.
    16. Frambach, Ruud T. & Schillewaert, Niels, 2002. "Organizational innovation adoption: a multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 163-176, February.
    17. Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Banita Lal & Michael D. Williams & Marc Clement, 2017. "Citizens’ adoption of an electronic government system: towards a unified view," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 549-568, June.
    18. Dahlberg, Tomi & Öörni, Anssi, 2006. "Finnish consumers' expectations on developments and changes in payment habits : survey in connection with the research project "Finnish payment habits 2010"," Research Discussion Papers 32/2006, Bank of Finland.
    19. Zeleke Siraye Asnakew, 2020. "Customers’ Continuance Intention to Use Mobile Banking: Development and Testing of an Integrated Model," The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 123-146, April.
    20. Ana Čuić Tanković & Marina Perišić Prodan, 2024. "Digital Natives' Attitudes towards Blockchain Technology Usage," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2024(3), pages 75-93.
    21. Saghafi, Fatemeh & Noorzad Moghaddam, Ehsan & Aslani, Alireza, 2017. "Examining effective factors in initial acceptance of high-tech localized technologies: Xamin, Iranian localized operating system," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 275-288.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infott:v:25:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s40558-023-00263-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.