IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/anture/v72y2018icp180-182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Blockchain and tourism: Three research propositions

Author

Listed:
  • Önder, Irem
  • Treiblmaier, Horst

Abstract

•Blockchain and cryptocurrencies has been recognized by the financial sector.•Their impact on finance will flow on to the tourism industry.•The aim of this note is to start an academic discussion on blockchain and tourism.•Three high-level propositions are presented.•They are intended to be further refined and elaborated by the research community.

Suggested Citation

  • Önder, Irem & Treiblmaier, Horst, 2018. "Blockchain and tourism: Three research propositions," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 180-182.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:anture:v:72:y:2018:i:c:p:180-182
    DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2018.03.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016073831830029X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.annals.2018.03.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Filieri, Raffaele, 2016. "What makes an online consumer review trustworthy?," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 46-64.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shobhit Kakaria & Aline Simonetti & Enrique Bigne, 2024. "Interaction between extrinsic and intrinsic online review cues: perspectives from cue utilization theory," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 2469-2497, December.
    2. Pedro Campos & Eva Pinto & Ana Torres, 2025. "Rating and perceived helpfulness in a bipartite network of online product reviews," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1607-1639, June.
    3. Josef Zelenka & Tracy Azubuike & Martina Pásková, 2021. "Trust Model for Online Reviews of Tourism Services and Evaluation of Destinations," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Sunyoung Hlee & Hanna Lee & Chulmo Koo, 2018. "Hospitality and Tourism Online Review Research: A Systematic Analysis and Heuristic-Systematic Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-27, April.
    5. Chen, Ke & Chen, Jianxun & Zhan, Wu & Sharma, Piyush, 2020. "When in Rome! Complaint contagion effect in multi-actor service ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 628-641.
    6. Agrawal, Shiv Ratan & Mittal, Divya, 2022. "Optimizing customer engagement content strategy in retail and E-tail: Available on online product review videos," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    7. Raoofpanah, Iman & Zamudio, César & Groening, Christopher, 2023. "Review reader segmentation based on the heterogeneous impacts of review and reviewer attributes on review helpfulness: A study involving ZIP code data," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    8. Ketron, Seth, 2017. "Investigating the effect of quality of grammar and mechanics (QGAM) in online reviews: The mediating role of reviewer crediblity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 51-59.
    9. Javornik, Ana & Filieri, Raffaele & Gumann, Ralph, 2020. "“Don't Forget that Others Are Watching, Too!” The Effect of Conversational Human Voice and Reply Length on Observers' Perceptions of Complaint Handling in Social Media," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 100-119.
    10. Raffaele Filieri & Elisabetta Raguseo & Claudio Vitari, 2018. "What moderates the influence of extremely negative ratings? The role of review and reviewer characteristics," Post-Print halshs-01923196, HAL.
    11. Pandey, Prince & Singh, Jyoti Prakash, 2025. "Generating product reviews from aspect-based ratings using large language models," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    12. Chatterjee, Swagato & Goyal, Divesh & Prakash, Atul & Sharma, Jiwan, 2021. "Exploring healthcare/health-product ecommerce satisfaction: A text mining and machine learning application," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 815-825.
    13. Yi Feng & Yunqiang Yin & Dujuan Wang & Lalitha Dhamotharan & Joshua Ignatius & Ajay Kumar, 2023. "Diabetic patient review helpfulness: unpacking online drug treatment reviews by text analytics and design science approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(1), pages 387-418, September.
    14. Ewa Roszkowska & Bartłomiej Jefmański & Marta Kusterka-Jefmańska, 2024. "A synthetic measure for ranking overall satisfaction based on multidimensional ordinal data. The case of airlines on the TripAdvisor website," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 34(3), pages 221-242.
    15. Girardin, Florent & Bezençon, Valéry & Lunardo, Renaud, 2021. "Dealing with poor online ratings in the hospitality service industry: The mitigating power of corporate social responsibility activities," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    16. Dipankar Das, 2022. "Measurement of Trustworthiness of the Online Reviews," Papers 2210.00815, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    17. Zhang, Ziqiong & Qiao, Shuchen & Chen, Ying & Zhang, Zili, 2022. "Effects of spatial distance on consumers' review effort," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    18. Li Zhou & Chunqiao Tan & Huimin Zhao, 2022. "Information Disclosure Decision for Tourism O2O Supply Chain Based on Blockchain Technology," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, June.
    19. Martin Gellerstedt & T. Arvemo, 2019. "The impact of word of mouth when booking a hotel: could a good friend’s opinion outweigh the online majority?," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 289-311, September.
    20. Kumar, Sanjeev & Rajaguru, Rajesh & Yang, Lin, 2024. "Investigating how brand image and attitude mediate consumer susceptibility to eWOM and purchase intention: Comparing enterprise-owned vs. third-party online review websites using multigroup analysis," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:anture:v:72:y:2018:i:c:p:180-182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/annals-of-tourism-research/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.