IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infotm/v25y2024i1d10.1007_s10799-023-00398-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A repeated cross-sectional study on the implementation of electronic medication management system

Author

Listed:
  • Eui Dong Kim

    (The University of Sydney)

  • Kevin K. Y. Kuan

    (University of New South Wales)

  • Milan Rasikbhai Vaghasiya

    (The University of Sydney)

  • Naren Gunja

    (The University of Sydney)

  • Simon K. Poon

    (The University of Sydney)

Abstract

Many IS studies focus on initial user perceptions as drivers of initial IS success, but these perceptions may change over time. This study aims to examine whether there is any difference in the drivers of IS success between the initial adoption and the initial assimilation stages. With the Expectation Confirmation Model as the theoretical lens, a repeated cross-sectional study was conducted regarding clinicians’ perceptions of the implementation of electronic medication management systems (eMMS) in an Australian hospital, one at the time of implementation and another one at one year after the implementation. The results indicated that the means of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, social influence, clinician satisfaction, and organizational benefits are significantly higher in the initial assimilation stage than in the initial adoption stage, which means that expectations have been positively confirmed in the initial assimilation stage. More importantly, while perceived usefulness and social influence remain important one year after the implementation, perceived ease of use and facilitating conditions are moving toward a decrease in importance to the success of eMMS. This study provides a better understanding of how the importance of the factors influencing eMMS success changes over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Eui Dong Kim & Kevin K. Y. Kuan & Milan Rasikbhai Vaghasiya & Naren Gunja & Simon K. Poon, 2024. "A repeated cross-sectional study on the implementation of electronic medication management system," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 33-50, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infotm:v:25:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10799-023-00398-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10799-023-00398-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10799-023-00398-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10799-023-00398-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anol Bhattacherjee & Chieh-Peng Lin, 2015. "A unified model of IT continuance: three complementary perspectives and crossover effects," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 364-373, July.
    2. Samuelson, William & Zeckhauser, Richard, 1988. "Status Quo Bias in Decision Making," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 7-59, March.
    3. Likoebe M. Maruping & Hillol Bala & Viswanath Venkatesh & Susan A. Brown, 2017. "Going beyond intention: Integrating behavioral expectation into the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(3), pages 623-637, March.
    4. Vits, Jeroen & Gelders, Ludo, 2002. "Performance improvement theory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(3), pages 285-298, June.
    5. Ryan T. Wright & Nicholas Roberts & David Wilson, 2017. "The role of context in IT assimilation: A multi-method study of a SaaS platform in the US nonprofit sector," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(5), pages 509-539, September.
    6. Wanda J. Orlikowski & C. Suzanne Iacono, 2001. "Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the “IT” in IT Research—A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 121-134, June.
    7. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    8. William H. DeLone & Ephraim R. McLean, 1992. "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 60-95, March.
    9. Susan KY Chow & Wai‐Ying Chin & Hoi‐Yan Lee & Hiu‐Ching Leung & Fung‐Hei Tang, 2012. "Nurses’ perceptions and attitudes towards computerisation in a private hospital," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(11‐12), pages 1685-1696, June.
    10. Melih Engin & Fatih Gürses, 2019. "Adoption of Hospital Information Systems in Public Hospitals in Turkey: An Analysis with the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Model," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(06), pages 1-19, October.
    11. Burnkrant, Robert E & Cousineau, Alain, 1975. "Informational and Normative Social Influence in Buyer Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 2(3), pages 206-215, December.
    12. Stacie Petter & William DeLone & Ephraim McLean, 2008. "Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 236-263, June.
    13. Gary C. Moore & Izak Benbasat, 1991. "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 192-222, September.
    14. Boluwaji A. Akinnuwesi & Faith-Michael E. Uzoka & Onyinye Sandra Okwundu & Gbenga Fashoto, 2016. "Exploring biometric technology adoption in a developing country context using the modified UTAUT," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 23(4), pages 482-521.
    15. Dale L. Goodhue, 1995. "Understanding User Evaluations of Information Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(12), pages 1827-1844, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barbara H. Wixom & Peter A. Todd, 2005. "A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 85-102, March.
    2. Wen-Lung Shiau & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2013. "Citation and co-citation analysis to identify core and emerging knowledge in electronic commerce research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 94(3), pages 1317-1337, March.
    3. Kuo-Yu Huang & Yea-Ru Chuang, 2016. "A task–technology fit view of job search website impact on performance effects: An empirical analysis from Taiwan," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1253943-125, December.
    4. Tsung Teng Chen, 2012. "The development and empirical study of a literature review aiding system," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(1), pages 105-116, July.
    5. Peng, Zeyu & Sun, Yongqiang & Guo, Xitong, 2018. "Antecedents of employees’ extended use of enterprise systems: An integrative view of person, environment, and technology," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 104-120.
    6. Sara Moussawi & Marios Koufaris & Raquel Benbunan-Fich, 2021. "How perceptions of intelligence and anthropomorphism affect adoption of personal intelligent agents," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(2), pages 343-364, June.
    7. Lee, Sang-Yong Tom & Kim, Hee-Woong & Gupta, Sumeet, 2009. "Measuring open source software success," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 426-438, April.
    8. Dehghani, Milad & William Kennedy, Ryan & Mashatan, Atefeh & Rese, Alexandra & Karavidas, Dionysios, 2022. "High interest, low adoption. A mixed-method investigation into the factors influencing organisational adoption of blockchain technology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 393-411.
    9. Siti Salwa Mohd Ishak & Sidney Newton, 2018. "Testing a Model of User Resistance Towards Technology Adoption in Construction Organizations," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(06), pages 1-27, December.
    10. Queiroz, Maciel M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2019. "Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 70-82.
    11. Sarv Devaraj & Ming Fan & Rajiv Kohli, 2002. "Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating e-Commerce Metrics," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 316-333, September.
    12. Andreas I. Nicolaou & D. Harrison McKnight, 2006. "Perceived Information Quality in Data Exchanges: Effects on Risk, Trust, and Intention to Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 332-351, December.
    13. Cheikh-Ammar, Mustapha, 2024. "Toward a theory of technology desirability: Blending task and feature fit with mutual values," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    14. Wolff, Stefanie & Madlener, Reinhard, 2018. "Driven by Change: Commercial Drivers’ Acceptance and Perceived Efficiency of Using Light-Duty Electric Vehicles in Germany," FCN Working Papers 11/2018, E.ON Energy Research Center, Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN).
    15. Andrew Burton-Jones & Detmar W. Straub, 2006. "Reconceptualizing System Usage: An Approach and Empirical Test," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 228-246, September.
    16. Wasfi Al-Rawabdah & Adel A. Salloum & Serene Zakaria Tarawneh, 2021. "The Moderating Role Of Factors That Influence User Adoption Of Mobile Health Applications: Evidence From Jordan," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18.
    17. Zhunzhun Liu & Shenglin Ben & Ruidong Zhang, 2019. "Factors affecting consumers’ mobile payment behavior: a meta-analysis," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 575-601, September.
    18. Smith, Carlo D. & Mentzer, John T., 2010. "Forecasting task-technology fit: The influence of individuals, systems and procedures on forecast performance," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 144-161, January.
    19. Barbara L. Marcolin & Deborah R. Compeau & Malcolm C. Munro & Sid L. Huff, 2000. "Assessing User Competence: Conceptualization and Measurement," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(1), pages 37-60, March.
    20. Haque, AKM Bahalul & Islam, A.K.M. Najmul & Mikalef, Patrick, 2023. "Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) from a user perspective: A synthesis of prior literature and problematizing avenues for future research," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infotm:v:25:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10799-023-00398-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.