IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v22y2020i6d10.1007_s10796-019-09939-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Factors Influencing Employees’ Consumptive and Contributive Use of Enterprise Social Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Pei Yee Chin

    (Universiti Malaysia Sabah
    University of South Australia)

  • Nina Evans

    (University of South Australia)

  • Charles Zhechao Liu

    (University of Texas at San Antonio)

  • Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo

    (University of South Australia
    University of Texas at San Antonio)

Abstract

There has been an exponential growth use of enterprise social networks for improved communication, connection, collaboration and enhanced knowledge sharing within organizations. However, the intended benefits of this social network deployment have not been fully realized due to the relative low usage among employees. This study provides an insight into the underlying factors deemed likely to influence employees’ enterprise social networks consumptive and contributive use by modifying and extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). An online survey was conducted and data were collected from 158 employees whose organizations are currently deploying a workplace social platform. The data were validated and analyzed using partial least square (PLS-SEM) method and Ordered Logistic Regression (OLR). Significant differences were found regarding the factors that influence consumptive and contributive use. The most influential factors for consumptive use are performance expectancy and content value, followed by facilitating conditions and effort expectancy. On the other hand, the contributive use is strongly influenced by social influence, content value and relationship expectancy. Moreover, a more balanced use pattern as measured by a smaller gap in consumptive and contributive use is shown to be positively associated with increased overall enterprise social network use. This study provides implications for managers to develop appropriate interventions to address idiosyncratic enterprise social network use patterns, minimize resistance and maximize effective utilization of the social platform among employees. This paper fulfills the need to identify important factors to be actively managed and manipulated to fully realize the benefits from the investment of enterprise social network.

Suggested Citation

  • Pei Yee Chin & Nina Evans & Charles Zhechao Liu & Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo, 2020. "Understanding Factors Influencing Employees’ Consumptive and Contributive Use of Enterprise Social Networks," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 1357-1376, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:22:y:2020:i:6:d:10.1007_s10796-019-09939-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-019-09939-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-019-09939-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-019-09939-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haijing Hao & Rema Padman & Baohong Sun & Rahul Telang, 2018. "Quantifying the Impact of Social Influence on the Information Technology Implementation Process by Physicians: A Hierarchical Bayesian Learning Approach," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 25-41, March.
    2. Lynn Wu, 2013. "Social Network Effects on Productivity and Job Security: Evidence from the Adoption of a Social Networking Tool," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 30-51, March.
    3. Qilin Cao & Yong Lu & Dayong Dong & Zongming Tang & Yongqiang Li, 2013. "The roles of bridging and bonding in social media communities," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(8), pages 1671-1681, August.
    4. Sinan Aral & Chrysanthos Dellarocas & David Godes, 2013. "Introduction to the Special Issue ---Social Media and Business Transformation: A Framework for Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 3-13, March.
    5. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    6. Likoebe M. Maruping & Hillol Bala & Viswanath Venkatesh & Susan A. Brown, 2017. "Going beyond intention: Integrating behavioral expectation into the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(3), pages 623-637, March.
    7. Caroline Haythornthwaite & Barry Wellman, 1998. "Work, friendship, and media use for information exchange in a networked organization," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 49(12), pages 1101-1114.
    8. William H. DeLone & Ephraim R. McLean, 1992. "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 60-95, March.
    9. Jun Sun, 2012. "Why different people prefer different systems for different tasks: An activity perspective on technology adoption in a dynamic user environment," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(1), pages 48-63, January.
    10. Jun Sun, 2012. "Why different people prefer different systems for different tasks: An activity perspective on technology adoption in a dynamic user environment," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(1), pages 48-63, January.
    11. Gary C. Moore & Izak Benbasat, 1991. "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 192-222, September.
    12. Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi & Steve Sawyer, 2015. "Theorizing on the take-up of social technologies, organizational policies and norms, and consultants' knowledge-sharing practices," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(1), pages 162-179, January.
    13. Bangaly Kaba & Bakary Touré, 2014. "Understanding information and communication technology behavioral intention to use: Applying the UTAUT model to social networking site adoption by young people in a least developed country," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 65(8), pages 1662-1674, August.
    14. Florian Probst & Laura Grosswiele & Regina Pfleger, 2013. "Who will lead and who will follow: Identifying Influential Users in Online Social Networks," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 5(3), pages 179-193, June.
    15. David Elsweiler & Morgan Harvey, 2015. "Engaging and maintaining a sense of being informed: Understanding the tasks motivating twitter search," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(2), pages 264-281, February.
    16. Haijing Hao & Rema Padman & Baohong Sun & Rahul Telang, 2019. "Modeling social learning on consumers’ long-term usage of a mobile technology: a Bayesian estimation of a Bayesian learning model," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 1-21, March.
    17. Qilin Cao & Yong Lu & Dayong Dong & Zongming Tang & Yongqiang Li, 2013. "The roles of bridging and bonding in social media communities," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(8), pages 1671-1681, August.
    18. Bin Zhang & Paul A. Pavlou & Ramayya Krishnan, 2018. "On Direct vs. Indirect Peer Influence in Large Social Networks," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 292-314, June.
    19. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    20. Silvana Trimi & Holta Galanxhi, 2014. "The impact of Enterprise 2.0 in organizations," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 8(3), pages 405-424, September.
    21. Brian S. Butler, 2001. "Membership Size, Communication Activity, and Sustainability: A Resource-Based Model of Online Social Structures," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 346-362, December.
    22. Mäntymäki, Matti & Riemer, Kai, 2016. "Enterprise social networking: A knowledge management perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1042-1052.
    23. Paul M. Leonardi, 2014. "Social Media, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovation: Toward a Theory of Communication Visibility," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 796-816, December.
    24. Daniel Z. Levin & Rob Cross, 2004. "The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(11), pages 1477-1490, November.
    25. Kexin Zhao & Bin Zhang & Xue Bai, 2018. "Estimating Contextual Motivating Factors in Virtual Interorganizational Communities of Practice: Peer Effects and Organizational Influences," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 910-927, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sebastian Schötteler & Sven Laumer & Heidi Schuhbauer, 2023. "Consequences of Enterprise Social Media Network Positions for Employees," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 65(4), pages 425-440, August.
    2. Leon, Ramona-Diana & Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Raúl & Alfaro-Saiz, 2023. "Enhancing Social Networking Learning by Using Enterprise Social Networks," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2023), Hybrid Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Hybrid Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 4-6 September, 2023, pages 400-410, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    3. Yee, Rachel W.Y. & Miquel-Romero, Maria-Jose & Cruz-Ros, Sonia, 2021. "Why and how to use enterprise social media platforms: The employee’s perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 517-526.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pei Yee Chin & Nina Evans & Charles Zhechao Liu & Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo, 0. "Understanding Factors Influencing Employees’ Consumptive and Contributive Use of Enterprise Social Networks," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    2. Queiroz, Maciel M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2019. "Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 70-82.
    3. Sven Dittes & Stefan Smolnik, 2019. "Towards a digital work environment: the influence of collaboration and networking on employee performance within an enterprise social media platform," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 89(8), pages 1215-1243, December.
    4. Maurice Kügler & Sven Dittes & Stefan Smolnik & Alexander Richter, 2015. "Connect Me! Antecedents and Impact of Social Connectedness in Enterprise Social Software," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 57(3), pages 181-196, June.
    5. Chen, Xiayu & Ou, Carol & Davison, Robert, 2022. "Internal or external social media? The effects of work-related and social-related use of social media on improving employee performance," Other publications TiSEM 429334bc-b257-4012-b0a9-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. Natalia Levina & Manuel Arriaga, 2014. "Distinction and Status Production on User-Generated Content Platforms: Using Bourdieu’s Theory of Cultural Production to Understand Social Dynamics in Online Fields," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 468-488, September.
    7. Siti Salwa Mohd Ishak & Sidney Newton, 2018. "Testing a Model of User Resistance Towards Technology Adoption in Construction Organizations," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(06), pages 1-27, December.
    8. Guych Nuryyev & Yu-Ping Wang & Jennet Achyldurdyyeva & Bih-Shiaw Jaw & Yi-Shien Yeh & Hsien-Tang Lin & Li-Fan Wu, 2020. "Blockchain Technology Adoption Behavior and Sustainability of the Business in Tourism and Hospitality SMEs: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, February.
    9. Chen Wei, 2021. "The influence of Consumers’ Purchase intention on Smart Wearable Device: A study of Consumers in East China," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 5(8), pages 46-72.
    10. Seok Chan Jeong & Beom-Jin Choi, 2022. "Moderating Effects of Consumers’ Personal Innovativeness on the Adoption and Purchase Intention of Wearable Devices," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, November.
    11. Emmanuelle Vaast & Alain Pinsonneault, 2022. "Dealing with the Social Media Polycontextuality of Work," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1428-1451, December.
    12. Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Banita Lal & Michael D. Williams & Marc Clement, 2017. "Citizens’ adoption of an electronic government system: towards a unified view," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 549-568, June.
    13. Vicki McKinney & Kanghyun Yoon & Fatemeh “Mariam” Zahedi, 2002. "The Measurement of Web-Customer Satisfaction: An Expectation and Disconfirmation Approach," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 296-315, September.
    14. Lorenz Graf-Vlachy & Katharina Buhtz & Andreas König, 2018. "Social influence in technology adoption: taking stock and moving forward," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 68(1), pages 37-76, February.
    15. Heijden, Hans van der, 2000. "E-Tam : a revision of the Technology Acceptance Model to explain website revisits," Serie Research Memoranda 0029, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    16. Allam, Hesham & Bliemel, Michael & Spiteri, Louise & Blustein, James & Ali-Hassan, Hossam, 2019. "Applying a multi-dimensional hedonic concept of intrinsic motivation on social tagging tools: A theoretical model and empirical validation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 211-222.
    17. Sanjeev Jha & Chen Ye, 2016. "The Impact of Demographic Variables on Perception of Importance and Continued Usage of Facebook in the US," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(1), pages 1-15, February.
    18. Segars, A. H., 1997. "Assessing the unidimensionality of measurement: a paradigm and illustration within the context of information systems research," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 107-121, February.
    19. Peng, Zeyu & Sun, Yongqiang & Guo, Xitong, 2018. "Antecedents of employees’ extended use of enterprise systems: An integrative view of person, environment, and technology," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 104-120.
    20. Tingting Song & Qian Tang & Jinghua Huang, 2019. "Triadic Closure, Homophily, and Reciprocation: An Empirical Investigation of Social Ties Between Content Providers," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 912-926, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:22:y:2020:i:6:d:10.1007_s10796-019-09939-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.