IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v27y2025i2d10.1007_s10796-024-10474-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Speeding up Explorative BPM with Lightweight IT: the Case of Machine Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Casper Solheim Bojer

    (Aalborg University)

  • Bendik Bygstad

    (University of Oslo)

  • Egil Øvrelid

    (University of Oslo)

Abstract

In the modern digital age, companies need to be able to quickly explore the process innovation affordances of digital technologies. This includes exploration of Machine Learning (ML), which when embedded in processes can augment or automate decisions. BPM research suggests using lightweight IT (Bygstad, Journal of Information Technology, 32(2), 180–193 2017) for digital process innovation, but existing research provides conflicting views on whether ML is lightweight or heavyweight. We therefore address the research question “How can Lightweight IT contribute to explorative BPM for embedded ML?” by analyzing four action cases from a large Danish manufacturer. We contribute to explorative BPM by showing that lightweight ML considerably speeds up opportunity assessment and technical implementation in the exploration process thus reducing process innovation latency. We furthermore show that succesful lightweight ML requires the presence of two enabling factors: 1) loose coupling of the IT infrastructure, and 2) extensive use of building blocks to reduce custom development.

Suggested Citation

  • Casper Solheim Bojer & Bendik Bygstad & Egil Øvrelid, 2025. "Speeding up Explorative BPM with Lightweight IT: the Case of Machine Learning," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 823-840, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:27:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10796-024-10474-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-024-10474-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-024-10474-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-024-10474-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Herbert A. Simon, 1996. "The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd Edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262691914, December.
    2. Alexander Lavin & Ciarán M. Gilligan-Lee & Alessya Visnjic & Siddha Ganju & Dava Newman & Sujoy Ganguly & Danny Lange & Atílím Güneş Baydin & Amit Sharma & Adam Gibson & Stephan Zheng & Eric P. Xing &, 2022. "Technology readiness levels for machine learning systems," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Karl R. Lang & Vojislav B. Misic & Leon J. Zhao, 2015. "Special section on business process analytics," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 1191-1194, December.
    4. Thomas H. Davenport, 2018. "From analytics to artificial intelligence," Journal of Business Analytics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 73-80, July.
    5. Reis, Carolina & Ruivo, Pedro & Oliveira, Tiago & Faroleiro, Paulo, 2020. "Assessing the drivers of machine learning business value," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 232-243.
    6. Göran Goldkuhl, 2012. "Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 135-146, March.
    7. Bendik Bygstad & Egil Øvrelid, 2020. "Architectural alignment of process innovation and digital infrastructure in a high-tech hospital," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 220-237, May.
    8. Abayomi Baiyere & Hannu Salmela & Tommi Tapanainen, 2020. "Digital transformation and the new logics of business process management," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 238-259, May.
    9. Dubois, Anna & Gadde, Lars-Erik, 2002. "Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(7), pages 553-560, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steven Groß & Thomas Grisold & Jan Mendling & Jennifer Haase, 2024. "Idea generation in exploitative and explorative business process redesign techniques," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 527-555, September.
    2. Mahendrawathi ER & Natasha Ratna Puspita Mulyono & Ivan Althirafi Rentio & Ika Nurkasanah, 2024. "How do digital startups manage their activities? Insights and opportunities for business process management," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 557-598, September.
    3. Pascal Dey & Chris Steyaert, 2016. "Rethinking the Space of Ethics in Social Entrepreneurship: Power, Subjectivity, and Practices of Freedom," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(4), pages 627-641, February.
    4. Saarijärvi, Hannu & Mitronen, Lasse & Yrjölä, Mika, 2014. "From selling to supporting – Leveraging mobile services in the context of food retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 26-36.
    5. Alan Hevner & Isabelle Comyn-Wattiau & Jacky Akoka & Nicolas Prat, 2018. "A pragmatic approach for identifying and managing design science research goals and evaluation criteria," Post-Print hal-02283783, HAL.
    6. Tobias Knabke & Sebastian Olbrich, 2018. "Building novel capabilities to enable business intelligence agility: results from a quantitative study," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 493-546, August.
    7. Zhang, Hongjuan & Young, Michael N. & Tan, Justin & Sun, Weizheng, 2018. "How Chinese companies deal with a legitimacy imbalance when acquiring firms from developed economies," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(5), pages 752-767.
    8. Sunder Shyam, 2011. "Imagined Worlds of Accounting," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-14, January.
    9. Anna Adamik & Michał Nowicki, 2019. "Pathologies and Paradoxes of Co-Creation: A Contribution to the Discussion about Corporate Social Responsibility in Building a Competitive Advantage in the Age of Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-38, September.
    10. Caroline Ardelet & Nathalie Veg-Sala & Alain Goudey & Marie Haikel-Elsabeh, 2017. "Between fear and desire for smart products: toward an understanding of consumers ambivalence [Entre crainte et désir pour les objets connectés : comprendre l'ambivalence des consommateurs]," Post-Print hal-01570286, HAL.
    11. Fiori Stefano, 2005. "The emergence of instructions : some open problems in Hayek's theory," CESMEP Working Papers 200504, University of Turin.
    12. Guiette, Alain & Vandenbempt, Koen, 2017. "Change managerialism and micro-processes of sensemaking during change implementation," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 65-81.
    13. Andrzej Janowski & Anna Szczepańska-Przekota, 2022. "The Trait of Extraversion as an Energy-Based Determinant of Entrepreneur’s Success—The Case of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    14. Hadi Hussain & Wen Jun & Magdalena Radulescu, 2025. "Innovation Performance in the Digital Divide Context: Nexus of Digital Infrastructure, Digital Innovation, and E-knowledge," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 3772-3792, March.
    15. McCown, R. L., 2002. "Changing systems for supporting farmers' decisions: problems, paradigms, and prospects," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 179-220, October.
    16. Jin P. Gerlach & Ronald T. Cenfetelli, 2022. "Overcoming the Single-IS Paradigm in Individual-Level IS Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 476-488, June.
    17. Menzies, Jane & Chavan, Meena & Jack, Robert & Scarparo, Simona & Chirico, Francesco, 2024. "Australian indigenous female entrepreneurs: The role of adversity quotient," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    18. Kazadi, Kande & Lievens, Annouk & Mahr, Dominik, 2016. "Stakeholder co-creation during the innovation process: Identifying capabilities for knowledge creation among multiple stakeholders," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 525-540.
    19. Basile, Luigi Jesus & Carbonara, Nunzia & Pellegrino, Roberta & Panniello, Umberto, 2023. "Business intelligence in the healthcare industry: The utilization of a data-driven approach to support clinical decision making," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    20. Loris Gaio, 2005. "A diversity-based approach to requirements tracing in new product development," ROCK Working Papers 031, Department of Computer and Management Sciences, University of Trento, Italy, revised 13 Jun 2008.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:27:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10796-024-10474-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.