IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v16y2025i2d10.1007_s13198-024-02702-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling the enablers for sustainable adoption of water ionizers: an ISM-MICMAC approach

Author

Listed:
  • Saurabh Pandey

    (Delhi Technological University)

  • Deepti Aggrawal

    (Delhi Technological University)

Abstract

Literature is evident of research work pertaining to water sustainability. Plenty of ways have been described in the past wherein energy efficient and water quality devices have gained good consideration of researchers. Amongst this theme, water ionizers have fetched significant attention in recent years due to their potential benefits for human health and the environment. The objective of research on water ionization technology, sustainable practices, and consumer behaviour is to empirically analyse and clarify the factors that impact the consumers’ perception and adoption of water ionizers. Firstly, this study explores the enablers for the sustainable adoption of water ionizers using an Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) approach establishing contextual relationships among these factors, which results in hierarchical structure in the form of digraph. Secondly, MICMAC analysis approach to categorize and identifying factors based on driving power and dependence power aiming to construct a comprehensive framework that highlights the critical variables influencing the adoption process. This dual approach not only provides valuable insights into the dynamics of water ionizer adoption but also facilitates the development of targeted strategies to promote or mitigate specific influences. The findings of this study are expected to contribute significantly to the understanding of sustainable technology adoption and offer practical implications for stakeholders aiming to enhance the acceptance and utilization of water ionizers. Questionnaires are thoughtfully crafted to gather precise responses, ultimately providing valuable insights for manufacturers and policymakers. The research hypothesizes that the ISM-MICMAC model effectively identifies and emphasizes product features and environmental sustainability as critical factors contributing to the health benefits that drive the sustainable adoption of water ionizers.

Suggested Citation

  • Saurabh Pandey & Deepti Aggrawal, 2025. "Modeling the enablers for sustainable adoption of water ionizers: an ISM-MICMAC approach," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 16(2), pages 868-882, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:16:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s13198-024-02702-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-024-02702-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-024-02702-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-024-02702-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jorge Alejandro Silva, 2023. "Wastewater Treatment and Reuse for Sustainable Water Resources Management: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-31, July.
    2. Tammie Ronen & Dorit Kerret, 2020. "Promoting Sustainable Wellbeing: Integrating Positive Psychology and Environmental Sustainability in Education," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Rohit Sindhwani & Venkataramanaiah Saddikuti & Omkarprasad S. Vaidya, 2023. "Evaluation of enablers of supply chain resilience and responsibility in India during large-scale disruptions: an ISM-ANP approach," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 48(2), pages 178-220.
    4. Subrata Kumar Patra & Tilak Raj & B.B. Arora, 2021. "An analysis and modelling of selected barriers for a sustainable manufacturing system using ISM technique," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 41(3), pages 373-398.
    5. Marco Vacchi & Cristina Siligardi & Fabio Demaria & Erika Iveth Cedillo-González & Rocío González-Sánchez & Davide Settembre-Blundo, 2021. "Technological Sustainability or Sustainable Technology? A Multidimensional Vision of Sustainability in Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Jessica Coria & Clara Villegas-Palacio, 2014. "Regulatory Dealing: Technology Adoption Versus Enforcement Stringency Of Emission Taxes," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 32(2), pages 451-473, April.
    7. Li, Wenbo & Long, Ruyin & Chen, Hong & Geng, Jichao, 2017. "A review of factors influencing consumer intentions to adopt battery electric vehicles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 318-328.
    8. Martin Schreier & Stefan Oberhauser & Reinhard Prügl, 2007. "Lead users and the adoption and diffusion of new products: Insights from two extreme sports communities," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 15-30, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huang, Youlin & Qian, Lixian, 2021. "Consumer adoption of electric vehicles in alternative business models," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    2. Idiano D'Adamo & Massimo Gastaldi & Ilhan Ozturk, 2023. "The sustainable development of mobility in the green transition: Renewable energy, local industrial chain, and battery recycling," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 840-852, April.
    3. Natascia Andrenacci & Roberto Ragona & Antonino Genovese, 2020. "Evaluation of the Instantaneous Power Demand of an Electric Charging Station in an Urban Scenario," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, May.
    4. Idiano D'Adamo & Alessandro Dell'Aguzzo & Marco Pruckner, 2024. "Residential photovoltaic and energy storage systems for sustainable development: An economic analysis applied to incentive mechanisms," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 84-100, February.
    5. Pradeep Kumar Ponnamma Divakaran & Jie Xiong, 2022. "Eliciting brand association networks: A new method using online community data," Post-Print hal-03700393, HAL.
    6. Jolanta Janiszewska & Paulina Rajewska, 2025. "Development of a Concept for Closing the Water Cycle in the Surface Treatment of Ferrous and Non-Ferrous Metals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Assunta Di Vaio & Rohail Hassan & Gabriella D’Amore & Riccardo Tiscini, 2024. "Responsible innovation and ethical corporate behavior in the Asian fashion industry: A systematic literature review and avenues ahead," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 1129-1173, September.
    8. Tietze, Frank & Pieper, Thorsten & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2013. "To own or not to own: How ownership affects user innovation - An empirical study in the German rowing community," Working Papers 73, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    9. Alexander Brem & Volker Bilgram & Adele Gutstein, 2021. "Involving Lead Users in Innovation: A Structured Summary of Research on the Lead User Method," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Alexander Brem (ed.), Emerging Issues and Trends in INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, chapter 2, pages 21-48, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    10. Sakellariou, Evy & Karantinou, Kalipso & Goffin, Keith, 2020. "From user insights to user foresights: Applying video-based ethnographic narratives and user innovation in NPD," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    11. Shuai Qin & Hong Chen & Haokun Wang, 2021. "Spatial–Temporal Heterogeneity and Driving Factors of Rural Residents’ Food Consumption Carbon Emissions in China—Based on an ESDA-GWR Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    12. Fiedler, Jakob & Schorn, André & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2023. "The influence of risk classification and community affiliation on the acceptance of user-innovated medical devices," Working Papers 115, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    13. Zulmira Ximenes da Costa & Floris Cornelis Boogaard & Valente Ferreira & Satoshi Tamura, 2024. "Wastewater Management Strategy for Resilient Cities—Case Study: Challenges and Opportunities for Planning a Sustainable Timor-Leste," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-29, June.
    14. Khumbelo Mabadahanye & Mwazvita T. B. Dalu & Linton F. Munyai & Farai Dondofema & Tatenda Dalu, 2025. "Perceptions and Knowledge of Water and Wastewater Treatment Plant Workers Regarding Plastic Pollution and Removal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-13, January.
    15. Fabio Luis Marques dos Santos & Paolo Tecchio & Fulvio Ardente & Ferenc Pekár, 2021. "User Automotive Powertrain-Type Choice Model and Analysis Using Neural Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    16. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special1:p:28-39 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Ta Thi Nguyet Trang & Pham Chien Thang & Le Dinh Hai & Vi Thi Phuong & Tran Quang Quy, 2024. "Understanding the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Journalism: An Empirical Study in Vietnam," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    18. Goldschmidt, Rüdiger & Richter, Andreas & Pfeil, Raphael, 2019. "Active stakeholder involvement and organisational tasks as factors for an effective communication and governance strategy in the promotion of e-taxis. Results from a field research lab," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    19. Xiao Liao & Guangyu Ye & Juan Yu & Yunjiang Xi, 2021. "Identifying lead users in online user innovation communities based on supernetwork," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(2), pages 515-543, May.
    20. Nikolaos Tsalas & Spyridon K. Golfinopoulos & Stylianos Samios & Georgios Katsouras & Konstantinos Peroulis, 2024. "Optimization of Energy Consumption in a Wastewater Treatment Plant: An Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-43, June.
    21. Joerg Koenigstorfer & Andrea Groeppel-Klein, 2012. "Consumer acceptance of the mobile Internet," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 917-928, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:16:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s13198-024-02702-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.