IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijocsr/v10y2025i1d10.1186_s40991-025-00114-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Segmentation and strategy for promoting benefit corporation certification

Author

Listed:
  • D. Scott Borden

    (University of Arkansas and IE University)

  • Madeline Fones

    (Western Colorado University)

Abstract

This research investigates consumer segments based on their attitudes, knowledge, and intentions of purchasing Benefit Corporation Certified goods and services. Surveys of 1040 consumers in the United States reported low recognition of the certification (12.69%) and its logo (29.71%). Cluster analysis revealed four stable consumer segments with significantly different environmental attitudes, knowledge of the certification, and role of social impact as criteria for their purchasing decisions. These groups represent distinct opportunities for promoting the certification based on demographics, knowledge, interest, and purchasing criteria. For all four segments, reported familiarity of the certification did not increase ability to identify certified companies. Additionally, geographic location was not significantly different between clusters. A general strategy of associating Benefit Corporation Certification with durability and quality to increase consumer interest is recommended. Strategies for promoting Benefit Corporation Certified goods and services for each consumer segment are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • D. Scott Borden & Madeline Fones, 2025. "Segmentation and strategy for promoting benefit corporation certification," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijocsr:v:10:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s40991-025-00114-5
    DOI: 10.1186/s40991-025-00114-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s40991-025-00114-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s40991-025-00114-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijocsr:v:10:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s40991-025-00114-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.