IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/hecrev/v14y2024i1d10.1186_s13561-024-00559-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

One for all? Assessing the quality of Italian hospital care with the “benefit of the doubt” composite indicator methods

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Vidoli

    (University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Department of Economics, Society and Politics)

  • Giacomo Pignataro

    (University of Catania, Department of Economics and Business
    Politecnico di Milano, Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering)

  • Sebastiano Battiato

    (University of Catania, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science)

  • Francesco Guarnera

    (University of Catania, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science)

  • Calogero Guccio

    (University of Catania, Department of Economics and Business)

Abstract

Quality assessment in healthcare systems is challenging due to the multidimensional nature of healthcare services. This study evaluates the overall quality provided by hospitals using composite indicators under the Benefit of the Doubt (BoD) approach, which determines the weights of the indicators with minimal assumptions. We used data from 2015-2020 for Italian Local Health Authorities (LHAs) for 21 outcome measures, applying various non-parametric methods to address aggregation and weighting challenges. Our results show that the BoD measures are robust and effectively capture the dynamics of the quality of LHA, even during external shocks such as the COVID-19 pandemic. This research highlights the importance of methodological choices in the construction of composite indicators and demonstrates the effectiveness of the BoD approach in providing a comprehensive measure of healthcare quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Vidoli & Giacomo Pignataro & Sebastiano Battiato & Francesco Guarnera & Calogero Guccio, 2024. "One for all? Assessing the quality of Italian hospital care with the “benefit of the doubt” composite indicator methods," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:14:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-024-00559-7
    DOI: 10.1186/s13561-024-00559-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s13561-024-00559-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s13561-024-00559-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:14:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-024-00559-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/13561 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.