IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/grdene/v34y2025i3d10.1007_s10726-025-09918-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethical Conflict and Team Innovation: A Categorization– Elaboration Model Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Erica Wen Chen

    (Renmin University of China)

  • Cathy Yang Guo

    (UMR 9221 - LEM - Lille Économie Management
    Univ. Lille, UMR 9221 - LEM - Lille Économie Management
    CNRS, UMR 9221 - LEM - Lille Économie Management)

  • Zhechen Yin

    (Tsinghua University)

  • Melvyn R.W. Hamstra

    (UMR 9221 - LEM - Lille Économie Management
    Univ. Lille, UMR 9221 - LEM - Lille Économie Management
    CNRS, UMR 9221 - LEM - Lille Économie Management)

  • Jingjing Yao

    (UMR 9221 - LEM - Lille Économie Management
    Univ. Lille, UMR 9221 - LEM - Lille Économie Management
    CNRS, UMR 9221 - LEM - Lille Économie Management)

Abstract

Conflict is an inherent aspect of group decision-making and interpersonal negotiations, but how ethical conflict (e.g., disagreement over moral values and ethical principles) shapes group dynamics remains an uncharted area. Drawing on the Categorization–Elaboration Model (CEM), we intend to examine whether and when team ethical conflict influences team innovation in the present study. Specifically, we predict that information elaboration serves as a mediator, as high levels of ethical conflict generate biased judgments among teammates and hinder the exchange of task-relevant information. Also, we predict that process conflict (e.g., disagreement over role allocation and task distribution) serves as the moderator, as low levels of process conflict ensure clear role distribution, efficient task allocation, and consensus on workflows, which can mitigate the negative effect of ethical conflict. We test our hypotheses and find empirical support using a sample of 289 individual responses nested within 90 research and development (R&D) teams. This research advances our understanding of the emerging and important construct of ethical conflict, extends the CEM by emphasizing the pivotal role of information elaboration in group decision-making, and offers new insights into the ongoing debate on conflict, innovation, and the interaction of different conflict types.

Suggested Citation

  • Erica Wen Chen & Cathy Yang Guo & Zhechen Yin & Melvyn R.W. Hamstra & Jingjing Yao, 2025. "Ethical Conflict and Team Innovation: A Categorization– Elaboration Model Approach," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 439-461, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:34:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10726-025-09918-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10726-025-09918-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-025-09918-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10726-025-09918-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:34:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10726-025-09918-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.