IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujoag/v21y2024i1d10.1007_s10433-024-00801-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Informing existing technology acceptance models: a qualitative study with older persons and caregivers

Author

Listed:
  • Nadine Andrea Felber

    (University of Basel
    Macquarie University)

  • Wendy Lipworth

    (Macquarie University)

  • Yi Jiao (Angelina) Tian

    (University of Basel)

  • Delphine Roulet Schwab

    (HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland)

  • Tenzin Wangmo

    (University of Basel)

Abstract

New technologies can help older persons age in place and support their caregivers. However, they need to be accepted by the end-users to do so. Technology acceptance models, such as TAM and UTAUT and their extensions, use factors like performance expectancy and effort expectancy to explain acceptance. Furthermore, they are based on quantitative methods. Our qualitative study investigates factors fostering and hindering acceptance among older persons and their caregivers for a variety of assistive technologies, including wearables, ambient sensors at home with and without cameras and social companion robots. The goal of this paper is twofold: On the one hand, it investigates the factors of technology acceptance models in a qualitative setting. On the other hand, it informs these models with aspects currently overlooked by them. The results reveal that performance expectancy and effort expectancy are relevant for acceptance. We also find that reliability, anxiety around technology and different social aspects have an influence on acceptance of assistive technology in aged care for all end-user groups. Our findings can be used to update current technology acceptance models and provide in-depth knowledge about the currently used factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Nadine Andrea Felber & Wendy Lipworth & Yi Jiao (Angelina) Tian & Delphine Roulet Schwab & Tenzin Wangmo, 2024. "Informing existing technology acceptance models: a qualitative study with older persons and caregivers," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujoag:v:21:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10433-024-00801-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10433-024-00801-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10433-024-00801-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10433-024-00801-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meuter, Matthew L. & Ostrom, Amy L. & Bitner, Mary Jo & Roundtree, Robert, 2003. "The influence of technology anxiety on consumer use and experiences with self-service technologies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 899-906, November.
    2. Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Nripendra P. Rana & Anand Jeyaraj & Marc Clement & Michael D. Williams, 2019. "Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 719-734, June.
    3. Tamilmani, Kuttimani & Rana, Nripendra P. & Wamba, Samuel Fosso & Dwivedi, Rohita, 2021. "The extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2): A systematic literature review and theory evaluation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    4. Maria Ehn & Ann-Christin Johansson & Åsa Revenäs, 2019. "Technology-Based Motivation Support for Seniors’ Physical Activity—A Qualitative Study on Seniors’ and Health Care Professionals’ Views," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Alam, Mohammad Zahedul & Hoque, Md. Rakibul & Hu, Wang & Barua, Zapan, 2020. "Factors influencing the adoption of mHealth services in a developing country: A patient-centric study," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 128-143.
    6. Zeng, Fangui & Wang, Mengmeng & Li, Lingzhe & Cai, Siqi, 2023. "Survey on the acceptance of smart cars amongst middle-aged and elderly in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    7. Rajak, Manindra & Shaw, Krishnendu, 2021. "An extension of technology acceptance model for mHealth user adoption," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    8. Hyo-Jin Kang & Jieun Han & Gyu Hyun Kwon, 2022. "The Acceptance Behavior of Smart Home Health Care Services in South Korea: An Integrated Model of UTAUT and TTF," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Mallinson, Sara, 2002. "Listening to respondents: : a qualitative assessment of the Short-Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 11-21, January.
    10. Daniel Wójcik & Katarzyna Szczechowiak & Patrycja Konopka & Mateusz Owczarek & Agata Kuzia & Izabela Rydlewska-Liszkowska & Małgorzata Pikala, 2021. "Informal Dementia Caregivers: Current Technology Use and Acceptance of Technology in Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-14, March.
    11. Patil, Pushp & Tamilmani, Kuttimani & Rana, Nripendra P. & Raghavan, Vishnupriya, 2020. "Understanding consumer adoption of mobile payment in India: Extending Meta-UTAUT model with personal innovativeness, anxiety, trust, and grievance redressal," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicoleta Cristache & Nicoleta Valentina Florea & Marian Nastase & Gabriel Croitoru & Costinela Fortea & Manuela-Violeta Tureatca, 2025. "The Influence of Political, Social, and Economic Factors on the Acceptance of Technology in the Workplace in the Context of Industrial Revolution 4.0," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 27(68), pages 1-76, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. G. M. Azmal Ali Quaosar & Md. Abidur Rahman & Md. Siddikur Rahman, 2024. "Factors Affecting the Adoption of HRIS: An Empirical Study Using Extended UTAUT2 Model," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 19(3), pages 213-213, June.
    2. Giacomo Migliore & Ralf Wagner & Felipe Schneider Cechella & Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas, 2022. "Antecedents to the Adoption of Mobile Payment in China and Italy: an Integration of UTAUT2 and Innovation Resistance Theory," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 2099-2122, December.
    3. Sarker, Prianka & Hughes, Laurie & Malik, Tegwen & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2025. "Examining consumer adoption of social commerce: An extended META-UTAUT model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    4. Haibei Chen & Xianglian Zhao, 2023. "Use intention of green financial security intelligence service based on UTAUT," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 10709-10742, October.
    5. Kamoonpuri, Sana Zehra & Sengar, Anita, 2023. "Hi, May AI help you? An analysis of the barriers impeding the implementation and use of artificial intelligence-enabled virtual assistants in retail," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    6. María García de Blanes Sebastián & José Ramón Sarmiento Guede & Alberto Azuara Grande & David Juárez-Varón, 2024. "Analysis of factors influencing attitude and intention to use electric vehicles for a sustainable future," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 1347-1368, August.
    7. Bernard John Tiika & Zhiwei Tang & Joshua Caleb Dagadu & Jacob Azaare & Samuel Nii-Ayi Otoo, 2024. "Tourists’ Adoption of Context-Aware Applications: A Case Study, Using Personal Locator Beacons at the Mole National Park, Ghana," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    8. Felix Friederich & Ramon Palau-Saumell & Jorge Matute & José Luis Sánchez-Torelló, 2024. "Investors’ acceptance and use of investment-based crowdfunding platforms: an integrated perspective," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(4), pages 1291-1303, December.
    9. Hayat, Naeem & Salameh, Anas A. & Malik, Haider Ali & Yaacob, Mohd Rafi, 2022. "Exploring the adoption of wearable healthcare devices among the Pakistani adults with dual analysis techniques," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    10. Fatema Al-Dhaen & Jiachen Hou & Nripendra P. Rana & Vishanth Weerakkody, 2023. "Advancing the Understanding of the Role of Responsible AI in the Continued Use of IoMT in Healthcare," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 2159-2178, December.
    11. Sujeet Kumar Sharma & Anubhav Mishra, 2023. "Enablers and Inhibitors of Mobile Payments in Rural India: a Dual-Factor Theory Perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 2335-2351, December.
    12. Paul Stefan MARKOVITS, 2024. "Assesing Romanian Farmers’ Motivation For Digitalization: A Unified Theory Of Acceptance And Usage Of Technology (Utaut) Based Research Model," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 98-112, March.
    13. Zhou, Zhikai & Liu, Dewen & Chen, Zhongjie & Pancho, Martin, 2025. "Government adoption of generative artificial intelligence and ambidextrous innovation," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    14. Higueras-Castillo, Elena & Liébana-Cabanillas, Francisco J. & Villarejo-Ramos, Ángel F., 2023. "Intention to use e-commerce vs physical shopping. Difference between consumers in the post-COVID era," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    15. Johan Hellemans & Kim Willems & Malaika Brengman, 2023. "Covid-19 and mobile payment in Belgium: Closing the digital divide or just for the young, social, and impulsive?," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1539-1564, September.
    16. de Blanes Sebastián, María García & Antonovica, Arta & Sarmiento Guede, José Ramón, 2023. "What are the leading factors for using Spanish peer-to-peer mobile payment platform Bizum? The applied analysis of the UTAUT2 model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    17. Melike Çağlayan & Ece Çağlayan & Cengiz Acartürk, 2025. "Stakeholder Perspectives on Rankings of Higher Education Institutions: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 66(3), pages 1-38, May.
    18. Wei Wei & Jie Sun & Wei Miao & Tong Chen & Hanchu Sun & Shuyuan Lin & Chao Gu, 2024. "Using the Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology to explore how to increase users’ intention to take a robotaxi," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Khan, Ikram Ullah, 2022. "How does culture influence digital banking? A comparative study based on the unified model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    20. Santos-Vijande, María Leticia & Gómez-Rico, Mar & Molina-Collado, Arturo & Davison, Robert M., 2022. "Building user engagement to mhealth apps from a learning perspective: Relationships among functional, emotional and social drivers of user value," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujoag:v:21:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10433-024-00801-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.