IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envsyd/v45y2025i2d10.1007_s10669-025-10006-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advances and barriers in promoting green logistics 4.0 from a multi-stakeholder perspective–a systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Thu-Hang Hoang

    (School of International Business – Marketing, University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City)

  • Thi-Trang Tran

    (HUTECH University)

  • Lam Nha Tu Huynh

    (School of International Business – Marketing, University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City)

  • Dung Khanh Vo

    (School of International Business – Marketing, University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City)

  • Bao Gia Huynh

    (School of International Business – Marketing, University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City)

  • Tam Minh Thi Tran

    (School of International Business – Marketing, University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City)

  • Nguyen Dang Nguyen

    (School of International Business – Marketing, University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City)

Abstract

As industries transition toward sustainability, Green Logistics (GL) has become a key driver for reducing the environmental impact of supply chain operations. This study conducts a systematic review from a multi-stakeholder perspective, exploring how Industry 4.0 (I4.0) technologies transform GL by enhancing efficiency, performance, and environmental responsibility. It examines GL’s technological advancements and techniques within the I4.0 era while identifying key barriers, including financial constraints, regulatory challenges, and resistance from primary and secondary stakeholders, that hinder widespread adoption. Our findings highlight that I4.0-driven innovations, such as IoT, blockchain, artificial intelligence, and automation, reshape logistics practices, offering new pathways for greener and more efficient supply chains. However, these advancements come with trade-offs, requiring careful evaluation of technological uncertainties, adoption costs, and evolving regulatory landscapes. Additionally, this study categorizes the tech and components that contribute to the promotion of GL, offering a structured understanding of how digital transformation interacts with sustainability goals. Ultimately, GL 4.0 presents both opportunities and challenges, demanding collaborative efforts across industries, policymakers, and communities to unlock its full potential. This review hopes to contribute to the growing discourse on digital transformation in green logistics, offering insights to guide firms and decision-makers in accelerating the shift toward more sustainable supply chains.

Suggested Citation

  • Thu-Hang Hoang & Thi-Trang Tran & Lam Nha Tu Huynh & Dung Khanh Vo & Bao Gia Huynh & Tam Minh Thi Tran & Nguyen Dang Nguyen, 2025. "Advances and barriers in promoting green logistics 4.0 from a multi-stakeholder perspective–a systematic review," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 1-19, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:45:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10669-025-10006-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10669-025-10006-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10669-025-10006-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10669-025-10006-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:45:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10669-025-10006-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.